Komodo wrote:Yeah, anyone who doesn't see the underlying philosophical issues with our corporate ownership needs to wake up. Rogers, Bell, Tanenbaum, MLSE, whatever. They're all part of the problem. This is solely a business venture for them. Here's the #1 reason why BC hasn't been canned yet, and may very well not be canned in the future:
How can anyone say that those financial results are because of Colangelo? What exactly has he himself done to achieve those results, in the sense what's his unique part in achieving them? How would the results have been any different from those under another GM? And why? The team has been horrendous. We haven't had an entertaining losing team, like, say, the run and gun GS Warriors of the past. We haven't had a human highlight reel guy who could entertain fans while the team was losing, e.g. Vince so long ago. The point being, how can anyone honestly say that any other GM capable of putting a very bad, boring, losing team onto the floor wouldn't have been able to achieve similar financial results?























