TorontoBarneys wrote:Why can't Scottie and Giannis work?
The better question is why do people even want this to work?
Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper
TorontoBarneys wrote:Why can't Scottie and Giannis work?
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.

Boogie! wrote:TorontoBarneys wrote:Why can't Scottie and Giannis work?
The better question is why do people even want this to work?
LoveMyRaps wrote:Scottie is the last guy I'd trade for Giannis.
TorontoBarneys wrote:Scase wrote:TorontoBarneys wrote:Why can't Scottie and Giannis work?
I'd say lack of shooting and operating in the same space, clogs up the paint a bunch especially with RJ/BI/Jak all operating in similar ranges.
I figured Poeltl is gone in this instance and Giannis operates at the 5. Stranger things have happened.
But yes, Scottie really has to improve his 3 and soon.

We found Pensare's burner account!LoveMyRaps wrote:Scottie is the last guy I'd trade for Giannis.
LoveMyRaps wrote:Scottie is the last guy I'd trade for Giannis.

TravisScott55 wrote:Nebuchadnezzar wrote:TravisScott55 wrote:Going after Giannis would gut the team, and not leave them with enough to be a contender after
Feels like there have been plenty of proposals here that are realistic - please explain what you mean.
Ingram Giannis and Quickley is not a contender. And keeping Scottie means horrible spacing.
Boogie! wrote:TorontoBarneys wrote:Why can't Scottie and Giannis work?
The better question is why do people even want this to work?
earthtone wrote:JB7 wrote:earthtone wrote:I’m sure Jon Horst also realizes the value of future picks too.
Hard to say for sure without knowing the other deals on the table, but I find it hard to imagine trading your franchise centrepiece/multiple time MVP without getting all tradeable firsts back from the other team (assuming you’re not Nico Harrison)
Getting FRPs from a team that is going to end up being one of the top teams in the league because of Giannis, means those FRPs have less value. Combined with the fact that the Bucks don't control their own picks, they are better off with a package of Barnes (4th pick), Gradey (13th pick), Ochai (14th pick) and the 2025 9th pick, which can all help the Bucks get back into development mode much quicker, than waiting on FRPs way out into the future that will probably be nowhere near the lottery.
Masai values holding onto the teams own picks, because if a season goes off the rails, they can easily pivot to tanking to get a higher pick. Better to have the control over your own pick, then hoping for another team to fall apart if you have their pick (and they have no incentive to tank).
I mean it’s clear why Masai would want to hold on to future firsts, but the same reason he’d want to hold on to them the same reason the Bucks would want them. You never know where a team will be in 5-6 years from now, having their unprotected firsts is a good gamble to make.
They also give you way more tradable assets, which is valuable for a team like the Bucks with no picks and very little talent. If Scottie/Ochai/Dick is the base package, I don’t see a reason to settle for only one first when you could get unprotected picks/swaps for the next 5 years and still have it be a fair deal.
NinjaBro wrote:We found Pensare's burner account!LoveMyRaps wrote:Scottie is the last guy I'd trade for Giannis.

WuTang_OG wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:Kurtz wrote:
Spacing issues, but they can work imo as long as one of them can play the 5. Poetl-Giannis-Scottie imo not nearly enough spacing.
Just hard to imagine that you can get Giannis without giving up Barnes. Mind you, we all figured Pascal and/or OG would have to go in a Kawhi trade, and that didn't happen, so who knows.
Yeah we not getting Giannis without Barnes....Bucks will want Barnes to build around in that scenario along with the #9th pick and prolly RJ or Gradey along with all the picks we can offer...This is not the Kawhi situation where Kawhi was injured on his walk year....Bucks are going to get a bag for Giannis in this deal to who ever they trade him to...
I'm more than fine dealing Barnes. And quite honestly, I don't even think Barnes/Giannis would work all that well or I should say it wouldn't be Giannis' fully optimal lineup offensively.
Giannis wants to be the sole downhill initiator from his end of season comments. He would have BI and IQ on the side and we would need another 3 and D guy
JB7 wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:
Yeah we not getting Giannis without Barnes....Bucks will want Barnes to build around in that scenario along with the #9th pick and prolly RJ or Gradey along with all the picks we can offer...This is not the Kawhi situation where Kawhi was injured on his walk year....Bucks are going to get a bag for Giannis in this deal to who ever they trade him to...
I'm more than fine dealing Barnes. And quite honestly, I don't even think Barnes/Giannis would work all that well or I should say it wouldn't be Giannis' fully optimal lineup offensively.
Giannis wants to be the sole downhill initiator from his end of season comments. He would have BI and IQ on the side and we would need another 3 and D guy
They had RJ playing the right way when he first came to the Raps, focusing on open 3's and just slashing to the basket. That went out the window last year with sitting so many players. But I think that efficiency could come back in a lineup with Giannis, BI & IQ.
I think RJ is a player worth holding onto, because Giannis is going to need guys that can get a bucket in the crunch, and I would think that would be left to BI and RJ.