OAKLEY_2 wrote:Even if both players only had one skill say shooting Lillard would win hands down. Lillard has the mindset to run an offence and he can be a scorer when he has to. Lamb will be under pressure to be a scorer all the time. Lillard is clearly the superior selection. I can hear it now" we were all about to trade the pick but after meeting this young man and scouting him we felt..." I would bet in this draft for all players not named Davis the board is Barnes, Lillard, Waiters, Ross, Harkless, Sullinger.
I don't want to turn this into a Lamb vs Lillard discussion because I like both guys but....
I'm not sure how you can say one is "clearly the superior selection"
Lamb has won national championship being a major part of that success (Lillard didn't even get his team into the tourney), Lamb was selected to the FIBA team and did very well leading the team and than you're pointing out that Lamb would be under pressure to be a scorer all the time BUT THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HE DOES --- SCORE.
He is the TOP scoring wing in the lottery lol
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But back to Lillard, the Teague comparison does worry me a bit but I do know his numbers should be a lot better considering his role would be completely different (as one of the centerpieces vs being used as a complimentary role player). When I look at Teague's numbers there is potential there and if he were playing around his best most games his numbers look like they would resemble a Brandon Jennings but at greater efficiency and obviously you can't really complain about that....IF he were to pan out that way. I think it's completely possible but I'm coming down a notch from buying into some hype where I was really starting to think he was a borderline all-star guard in the making with a ceiling of Tony Parker lol.