Los_29 wrote:Indeed wrote:Los_29 wrote:
Not really though because leading up to the draft no one actually knew who the Raptors were taking. What was clear was Suggs had fallen out of that group with Mobley, Cade and Green and wasn't even a lock for #4.
It was a surprise in that people just assumed we'd go with Suggs because Lowry was leaving and Suggs would've slid right in. But he was by no means a lock at #4.
Lots of reputable draft analysts had Barnes quite high on their draft board. Higher than Suggs.
People gave us a bad preseason because we drafted Barnes over Suggs, no?
I remember one of the preseason grade was mainly looked at drafting.
And no, I was on the draft board before lottery, and Barnes wasn't that high. He raised up after Draft Combine with his measurement like a C
Yeah before the lottery he wasn't high but leading up to the draft his stock was rising and Suggs was falling. If the reports are true, quite a few teams had Barnes at #4 and some had him even at #3. Some draft analysts had Barnes as the #2 behind Mobley.
It was a surprising decision because people just penciled in Suggs as Lowry's replacement.
Before the Combine, he was already around #6 or #7 between Keon Johnson for some mock drafts. After workout, Orlando had him over Kuminga, and we had him over Suggs, which is not a surprised to me, and he was around top 8. The concern was his shooting for being lower, but probably not a concern for the Raptors.
As for Suggs, he was #2 in many draft boards before the Combine, and he dropped 3 spots, so people were surprised.