
The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- Mikistan
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,780
- And1: 38,822
- Joined: Jun 30, 2008
- Location: Shamblesland
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- Raps in 4
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,632
- And1: 61,548
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- OakleyDokely
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,996
- And1: 68,313
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: 416
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Crazy that there were rumours that the Raps tried hard to trade up for Mobley and were going to take Giddey if they didn't move up. They've been linked to the top 3 performing rooks so far in Barnes, Mobley and Giddey.Raps in 4 wrote:Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- WaltFrazier
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,491
- And1: 31,117
- Joined: Jan 21, 2006
- Location: Ontario Canada
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Raps in 4 wrote:Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
Being on bad teams will do that to rookies
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,127
- And1: 1,802
- Joined: Feb 14, 2016
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
WaltFrazier wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
Being on bad teams will do that to rookies
No, so far it looks like they were overhyped. This is not the case of being on a bad team. They should be scoring the lights out actually.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- Raps in 4
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,632
- And1: 61,548
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
WaltFrazier wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
Being on bad teams will do that to rookies
I mean, Cleveland and OKC suck too. We're not great either.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- LoveMyRaps
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,274
- And1: 48,747
- Joined: Jun 10, 2013
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Raps in 4 wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
Being on bad teams will do that to rookies
I mean, Cleveland and OKC suck too. We're not great either.
I think what Walt was tryna get at is that they suck at developing players (i.e. Cavs & Pistons)
Raptors & OKC do it well .
In Masai We Trust 



Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,980
- And1: 2,094
- Joined: Jul 19, 2010
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
WaltFrazier wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
Being on bad teams will do that to rookies
Then how do you explain the play of Scottie Barnes
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,132
- And1: 21,569
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
JJ From Deep wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
Being on bad teams will do that to rookies
Then how do you explain the play of Scottie Barnes
Raptors are bad but they aren't that bad.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 52,083
- And1: 50,740
- Joined: Jan 08, 2006
- Location: Pat's Homestyle Jamaican Restaurant. Shouts to Sheryl's Caribbean Cuisine
- Contact:
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Its not close.
Barnes by a mile.
Barnes by a mile.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- Clay Davis
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,988
- And1: 7,273
- Joined: Nov 06, 2013
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Josh Giddy looks a lot like how I envisioned Rand Al'thor to look
Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using RealGM mobile app

Steelo Green wrote:Even though you know somehow we all gotta go, as long as we believin' thievin' we'll be leavin' with some kind of dough.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- Tacoma
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,400
- And1: 5,466
- Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
If the Raps had drafted Suggs, we'd say Barnes is ahead at this point, but is only 20 games. We would point out that guys like Butler averaged 3 PPG or Dirk shot 20% from 3PT in their rookie season. Barnes/Suggs' rookie season still has 62 games left.
Suggs' defense is very good, as good as advertised for someone who played only 20 games. His issue is he can't shoot from long distance. Looking at the stats, 42% of his shots are from 3PT and he's doing it at a paltry rate of 25% (similar to Barnes). 49% of Suggs' shots are from beyond 16ft vs. only 18% for Barnes. Suggs is attempting 5 3PT shots per game vs. 1 attempt for Barnes.
All these misses on high volume and he's lost confidence but don't expect this to continue forever. We are fully expecting Barnes to improve his 3PT shot, so why not give the same leeway to Suggs? It's only 20 games into a long career for both high IQ players with excellent work ethic. Yes, Barnes is clearly ahead but it's a long season and a long career for both. The race has begun, not ended.
Suggs' defense is very good, as good as advertised for someone who played only 20 games. His issue is he can't shoot from long distance. Looking at the stats, 42% of his shots are from 3PT and he's doing it at a paltry rate of 25% (similar to Barnes). 49% of Suggs' shots are from beyond 16ft vs. only 18% for Barnes. Suggs is attempting 5 3PT shots per game vs. 1 attempt for Barnes.
All these misses on high volume and he's lost confidence but don't expect this to continue forever. We are fully expecting Barnes to improve his 3PT shot, so why not give the same leeway to Suggs? It's only 20 games into a long career for both high IQ players with excellent work ethic. Yes, Barnes is clearly ahead but it's a long season and a long career for both. The race has begun, not ended.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- 720
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,080
- And1: 67,676
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
- Location: Malton
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Damn Suggs has a lot of votes. Must have been during preseason or something.


✝
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- OakleyDokely
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,996
- And1: 68,313
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: 416
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Just given their physical profiles, I dont ever see Suggs being more valuable than Barnes.Tacoma wrote:If the Raps had drafted Suggs, we'd say Barnes is ahead at this point, but is only 20 games. We would point out that guys like Butler averaged 3 PPG or Dirk shot 20% from 3PT in their rookie season. Barnes/Suggs' rookie season still has 62 games left.
Suggs' defense is very good, as good as advertised for someone who played only 20 games. His issue is he can't shoot from long distance. Looking at the stats, 42% of his shots are from 3PT and he's doing it at a paltry rate of 25% (similar to Barnes). 49% of Suggs' shots are from beyond 16ft vs. only 18% for Barnes. Suggs is attempting 5 3PT shots per game vs. 1 attempt for Barnes.
All these misses on high volume and he's lost confidence but don't expect this to continue forever. We are fully expecting Barnes to improve his 3PT shot, so why not give the same leeway to Suggs? It's only 20 games into a long career for both high IQ players with excellent work ethic. Yes, Barnes is clearly ahead but it's a long season and a long career for both. The race has begun, not ended.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- Vampirate
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,647
- And1: 4,483
- Joined: Dec 04, 2016
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
720 wrote:Damn Suggs has a lot of votes. Must have been during preseason or something.
I'm not a scout, I pretty much wanted Suggs at the time because people including the media were hyping him up.
I saw him do a video where he did a crossover move and thought, we'll he has the handle to get to the basket at least.
At the end of the day though when they were drafted at the time, the more I thought of it, the more I thought that Barnes and Suggs were basically the same players, but Barnes was a bigger, stronger, longer, more athletic version but with worse shooting.

Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- 720
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,080
- And1: 67,676
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
- Location: Malton
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Vampirate wrote:720 wrote:Damn Suggs has a lot of votes. Must have been during preseason or something.
I'm not a scout, I pretty much wanted Suggs at the time because people including the media were hyping him up.
I saw him do a video where he did a crossover move and thought, we'll he has the handle to get to the basket at least.
At the end of the day though when they were drafted at the time, the more I thought of it, the more I thought that Barnes and Suggs were basically the same players, but Barnes was a bigger, stronger, longer, more athletic version but with worse shooting.
I wanted Suggs at the time too, but after we picked him the reports started coming out that Barnes had a great workout with us. Then all the footage of his workouts came out (his vertical tests and what not). Then in summer league game 1 and 4 he was great.
At the moment you could argue Barnes is a better shooter so far as well. They're both comparably bad at the three point line but Barnes has that mid range going.


✝
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- Vampirate
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,647
- And1: 4,483
- Joined: Dec 04, 2016
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
720 wrote:Vampirate wrote:720 wrote:Damn Suggs has a lot of votes. Must have been during preseason or something.
I'm not a scout, I pretty much wanted Suggs at the time because people including the media were hyping him up.
I saw him do a video where he did a crossover move and thought, we'll he has the handle to get to the basket at least.
At the end of the day though when they were drafted at the time, the more I thought of it, the more I thought that Barnes and Suggs were basically the same players, but Barnes was a bigger, stronger, longer, more athletic version but with worse shooting.
I wanted Suggs at the time too, but after we picked him the reports started coming out that Barnes had a great workout with us. Then all the footage of his workouts came out (his vertical tests and what not). Then in summer league game 1 and 4 he was great.
At the moment you could argue Barnes is a better shooter so far as well. They're both comparably bad at the three point line but Barnes has that mid range going.
The only player in the draft that has the physical/athletic advantage over Barnes is Mobley.
You just can't teach the ability to be able to easily dunk or shoot over people.
Obviously there are exceptions to this rule like JA Morant but his playstyle might lead to injuries, as does Zion's.
Obviously we'd be ecstatic to have either but that's the reality.
Barnes doesn't have the greatest jumping ability like a JA or the explosiveness of a Jalen Green, but in theory it should also make him more durable.
The more ease/less exertion the points come to the player the less strain on the body.

Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,039
- And1: 11,292
- Joined: Feb 20, 2006
- Location: Big green house
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
OakleyDokely wrote:Just given their physical profiles, I dont ever see Suggs being more valuable than Barnes.Tacoma wrote: Yes, Barnes is clearly ahead but it's a long season and a long career for both. The race has begun, not ended.
It was always a higher floor/higher ceiling issue. And Scottie has addressed any concern there. His floor is now equivalent to Suggs', and his ceiling (some sort of mashup of Giannis and Draymond) is considerably higher.
Having said that, Suggs' defence is really good, while Scottie's is a work in progress.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,039
- And1: 11,292
- Joined: Feb 20, 2006
- Location: Big green house
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
OakleyDokely wrote:Crazy that there were rumours that the Raps tried hard to trade up for Mobley and were going to take Giddey if they didn't move up. They've been linked to the top 3 performing rooks so far in Barnes, Mobley and Giddey.Raps in 4 wrote:Giddey is awesome. Him and Mobley were the only players I was right about in this draft lol (but I still didn't have the guts to rank Giddey ahead of Suggs).
I still can't wrap my head around how bad Cade, Green, and Suggs have been.
And then go back to reports of Masai being in on Giannis, SGA and LaMelo at their respective drafts. None of those guys were "gimme" stars-in-waiting.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,489
- And1: 6,008
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
tecumseh18 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Just given their physical profiles, I dont ever see Suggs being more valuable than Barnes.Tacoma wrote: Yes, Barnes is clearly ahead but it's a long season and a long career for both. The race has begun, not ended.
It was always a higher floor/higher ceiling issue. And Scottie has addressed any concern there. His floor is now equivalent to Suggs', and his ceiling (some sort of mashup of Giannis and Draymond) is considerably higher.
Having said that, Suggs' defence is really good, while Scottie's is a work in progress.
Draymond in the same sentence as Giannis is comical. If Barnes comparison is draymond than he’s a failure.
Don’t let NBA media/Twitter find comparable for you.