ImageImageImageImageImage

[Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

User avatar
DatHomieYouHaTe
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,698
And1: 4,003
Joined: Nov 23, 2003
       

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#561 » by DatHomieYouHaTe » Fri Jun 3, 2022 4:01 am

We have way too much salary committed to our starters. Getting a cheap and young player with way more upside while pushing Achiuwa to the starting line up just makes too much sense to me. I'd do it for Daniels and a salary filler but if you can get a little more try to do it.
Image
KenoP13
Junior
Posts: 348
And1: 176
Joined: Nov 03, 2021

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#562 » by KenoP13 » Fri Jun 3, 2022 4:54 am

lobosloboslobos wrote:
KenoP13 wrote:
720 wrote:I feel like you can only trade Siakam for an instant impact type player, someone with star potential or a package of 2-3 1st rounders (the picks gotta be high so not a trade to a contender for picks).

As each year goes by and he’s 1 year older obviously depending on how he plays this’ll change. But atm he should warrant a big package of picks and or prospects.


This is why Ujiri needs to become best friends with Divac in the next few weeks. Take him out drinking.. Pamper him up.. And get him to give us their fourth pick, Davion Mitchell and a few more first rounds picks.. Knowing their dysfunctional management.. Those picks could all be in the top 10.

Update- Oh, I had no clue Divac was out.. That really puts a hamper on everything..


The phrase is 'put a damper on things' not 'hamper'. Please use the appropriate word in future and refrain from such blatant hamperism.


Ok, thats fair... But, I have to say.. I spotted a grammatical mistake in your response and i'm extremely upset about it. That is all.
Ackshun
General Manager
Posts: 8,874
And1: 4,767
Joined: Jul 24, 2006

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#563 » by Ackshun » Fri Jun 3, 2022 5:09 am

I like OG and appreciate his quiet ability to put up solid numbers but I entertain any trade that brings me back 2 shooters or a great shooter+ rotation worthy big.

The reality is.. We won't be able to afford this core for much longer. Especially with its current ceiling.
User avatar
Syd-TK3
RealGM
Posts: 19,616
And1: 19,893
Joined: Jun 07, 2015
 

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#564 » by Syd-TK3 » Fri Jun 3, 2022 7:34 am

Still think you try and trade Trent over OG but if Portland really gets desperate to the point where they give us some sorta fleece potential you gotta do it
Image
User avatar
lobosloboslobos
RealGM
Posts: 12,942
And1: 18,509
Joined: Jan 08, 2009
Location: space is the place
 

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#565 » by lobosloboslobos » Fri Jun 3, 2022 11:31 am

KenoP13 wrote:
lobosloboslobos wrote:
KenoP13 wrote:
This is why Ujiri needs to become best friends with Divac in the next few weeks. Take him out drinking.. Pamper him up.. And get him to give us their fourth pick, Davion Mitchell and a few more first rounds picks.. Knowing their dysfunctional management.. Those picks could all be in the top 10.

Update- Oh, I had no clue Divac was out.. That really puts a hamper on everything..


The phrase is 'put a damper on things' not 'hamper'. Please use the appropriate word in future and refrain from such blatant hamperism.


Ok, thats fair... But, I have to say.. I spotted a grammatical mistake in your response and i'm extremely upset about it. That is all.


my anti-grammatical nature has brought many to tears. unfortunately i was born this way.
Image
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 41,571
And1: 52,028
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#566 » by WuTang_CMB » Fri Jun 3, 2022 11:38 am

If the cap goes to $160+ we will have no issue paying trent and og $50m a year.

But if they think Dyson can become SGA, i’d do that deal if they sweeten the pot
alpngso
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,417
And1: 4,601
Joined: Apr 20, 2016

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#567 » by alpngso » Fri Jun 3, 2022 11:42 am

Blazers’ perspective from reddit

In 2018 the Timberwolves traded the 7th pick for Jimmy Butler

I've seen a bunch of ramblings about trading #7 for OG or Grant. Those guys historically have never sniffed returning a mid lottery pick. The Jimmy Butler trade did feature a few more youngins' (Zach Lavine had 3 unremarkable seasons in Minn, and for being drafted at such an old age Kris Dunn had a terrible rookie season in Minn), so it is likely if Portland wants an all-star in return you'd have to part with some more valuable pieces like Nassir Little nad maybe a future pick.



But I just wanted to emphasize, if your sights are on a 3rd/4th option to trade #7 for, you're going to waste what time Dame has left with more first round exits.
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 41,571
And1: 52,028
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#568 » by WuTang_CMB » Fri Jun 3, 2022 12:15 pm

alpngso wrote:Blazers’ perspective from reddit

In 2018 the Timberwolves traded the 7th pick for Jimmy Butler

I've seen a bunch of ramblings about trading #7 for OG or Grant. Those guys historically have never sniffed returning a mid lottery pick. The Jimmy Butler trade did feature a few more youngins' (Zach Lavine had 3 unremarkable seasons in Minn, and for being drafted at such an old age Kris Dunn had a terrible rookie season in Minn), so it is likely if Portland wants an all-star in return you'd have to part with some more valuable pieces like Nassir Little nad maybe a future pick.



But I just wanted to emphasize, if your sights are on a 3rd/4th option to trade #7 for, you're going to waste what time Dame has left with more first round exits.


This guy is fried because #7 was already offered to Toronto for OG. He plays elite defense and will play alongside Dame + more opportunities ... he would likely average 21+ in Portland. That's why they want him and he's young. Perfect piece.
M3tro
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,128
And1: 3,700
Joined: Mar 15, 2018

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#569 » by M3tro » Fri Jun 3, 2022 1:35 pm

Where there's smoke there's fire.

We have a a glut of forwards and one of them was eventually going to get moved down the line.

No idea about anyone in the draft other than Chet, but we need a guard to pair with Scottie moving forward.
mtcan
RealGM
Posts: 27,878
And1: 24,299
Joined: May 19, 2001

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#570 » by mtcan » Fri Jun 3, 2022 1:52 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:
alpngso wrote:Blazers’ perspective from reddit

In 2018 the Timberwolves traded the 7th pick for Jimmy Butler

I've seen a bunch of ramblings about trading #7 for OG or Grant. Those guys historically have never sniffed returning a mid lottery pick. The Jimmy Butler trade did feature a few more youngins' (Zach Lavine had 3 unremarkable seasons in Minn, and for being drafted at such an old age Kris Dunn had a terrible rookie season in Minn), so it is likely if Portland wants an all-star in return you'd have to part with some more valuable pieces like Nassir Little nad maybe a future pick.



But I just wanted to emphasize, if your sights are on a 3rd/4th option to trade #7 for, you're going to waste what time Dame has left with more first round exits.


This guy is fried because #7 was already offered to Toronto for OG. He plays elite defense and will play alongside Dame + more opportunities ... he would likely average 21+ in Portland. That's why they want him and he's young. Perfect piece.

OG is what the Blazers hoped Robert Covington would be when they traded Trevor Ariza and 2 first round picks for. OG is not only younger but better than Covington in every way.

And those first round picks were sent to Houston...one of which was Isiah Stewart who was traded to Detroit for Christian Wood. The other first round pick became Usman Garuba. So the Rockets really won that trade.

So if the asking price for Robert Covington is 2 first round picks...asking Josh Hart, Keon Johnson, #7 and a future protected 1st is not unreasonable.
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 34,029
And1: 31,570
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#571 » by WaltFrazier » Fri Jun 3, 2022 1:53 pm

M3tro wrote:Where there's smoke there's fire.

We have a a glut of forwards and one of them was eventually going to get moved down the line.

No idea about anyone in the draft other than Chet, but we need a guard to pair with Scottie moving forward.


But our whole novel approach is to have a glut of forwards. According to the 6'9 longboi approach, it would be smaller guards who move, not OG
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
User avatar
Bruin
RealGM
Posts: 25,289
And1: 39,784
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
       

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#572 » by Bruin » Fri Jun 3, 2022 1:55 pm

alpngso wrote:Blazers’ perspective from reddit

In 2018 the Timberwolves traded the 7th pick for Jimmy Butler

I've seen a bunch of ramblings about trading #7 for OG or Grant. Those guys historically have never sniffed returning a mid lottery pick. The Jimmy Butler trade did feature a few more youngins' (Zach Lavine had 3 unremarkable seasons in Minn, and for being drafted at such an old age Kris Dunn had a terrible rookie season in Minn), so it is likely if Portland wants an all-star in return you'd have to part with some more valuable pieces like Nassir Little nad maybe a future pick.



But I just wanted to emphasize, if your sights are on a 3rd/4th option to trade #7 for, you're going to waste what time Dame has left with more first round exits.

The guy who posted this got cooked by his fellow blazers fans in the comments lol
Image
bongmarley
Veteran
Posts: 2,975
And1: 1,152
Joined: Nov 14, 2002

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#573 » by bongmarley » Fri Jun 3, 2022 1:57 pm

M3tro wrote:Where there's smoke there's fire.

We have a a glut of forwards and one of them was eventually going to get moved down the line.

No idea about anyone in the draft other than Chet, but we need a guard to pair with Scottie moving forward.


i am not sure I would call 4 guys (Scottie, OG, Pascal, Precious) a glut when there are 5 positions on the floor and each of these guys could play 3 different positions and scottie and pascal can play all 5 .
M3tro
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,128
And1: 3,700
Joined: Mar 15, 2018

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#574 » by M3tro » Fri Jun 3, 2022 1:59 pm

WaltFrazier wrote:
M3tro wrote:Where there's smoke there's fire.

We have a a glut of forwards and one of them was eventually going to get moved down the line.

No idea about anyone in the draft other than Chet, but we need a guard to pair with Scottie moving forward.


But our whole novel approach is to have a glut of forwards. According to the 6'9 longboi approach, it would be smaller guards who move, not OG


Unless we draft a 6'7 longboi guard for OG.
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 34,029
And1: 31,570
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#575 » by WaltFrazier » Fri Jun 3, 2022 2:05 pm

M3tro wrote:
WaltFrazier wrote:
M3tro wrote:Where there's smoke there's fire.

We have a a glut of forwards and one of them was eventually going to get moved down the line.

No idea about anyone in the draft other than Chet, but we need a guard to pair with Scottie moving forward.


But our whole novel approach is to have a glut of forwards. According to the 6'9 longboi approach, it would be smaller guards who move, not OG


Unless we draft a 6'7 longboi guard for OG.


We have Scottie and Banton. If it was a healthy big PG like Lonzo Ball then maybe, because a big PG kills 2 birds with one stone.

I'd love Lonzo here, but I don't want to lose OG in any circumstances, he's the one favorite player I have an emotional fan attachment to. :)
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
vulture
Head Coach
Posts: 6,935
And1: 5,960
Joined: Oct 04, 2002
Location: At the Border

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#576 » by vulture » Fri Jun 3, 2022 2:35 pm

Anytime you trade a player like OG, you are going to be looking for the next OG. He's just perfect on a winning team because his role can slide up and down depending what you need or who's in the lineup.
I do think he wants a bigger role so he can get paid more and that's normal.
Madhouse
RealGM
Posts: 12,323
And1: 9,892
Joined: Dec 23, 2014
 

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#577 » by Madhouse » Fri Jun 3, 2022 3:41 pm

vulture wrote:Anytime you trade a player like OG, you are going to be looking for the next OG. He's just perfect on a winning team because his role can slide up and down depending what you need or who's in the lineup.
I do think he wants a bigger role so he can get paid more and that's normal.


If we are trading him, we aren't looking for the next OG. We will be looking at a star or future star with legit guard skills.
Madhouse
RealGM
Posts: 12,323
And1: 9,892
Joined: Dec 23, 2014
 

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#578 » by Madhouse » Fri Jun 3, 2022 3:44 pm

Bruin wrote:
alpngso wrote:Blazers’ perspective from reddit

In 2018 the Timberwolves traded the 7th pick for Jimmy Butler

I've seen a bunch of ramblings about trading #7 for OG or Grant. Those guys historically have never sniffed returning a mid lottery pick. The Jimmy Butler trade did feature a few more youngins' (Zach Lavine had 3 unremarkable seasons in Minn, and for being drafted at such an old age Kris Dunn had a terrible rookie season in Minn), so it is likely if Portland wants an all-star in return you'd have to part with some more valuable pieces like Nassir Little nad maybe a future pick.



But I just wanted to emphasize, if your sights are on a 3rd/4th option to trade #7 for, you're going to waste what time Dame has left with more first round exits.

The guy who posted this got cooked by his fellow blazers fans in the comments lol


I think centering OG for #7 makes a lot of sense for both sides if the Raptors desired player in the draft is available. Could be one of those things where you agree that a deal happens if the Blazers can draft that certain player for the Raptors on draft day.
Madhouse
RealGM
Posts: 12,323
And1: 9,892
Joined: Dec 23, 2014
 

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#579 » by Madhouse » Fri Jun 3, 2022 3:46 pm

bongmarley wrote:
M3tro wrote:Where there's smoke there's fire.

We have a a glut of forwards and one of them was eventually going to get moved down the line.

No idea about anyone in the draft other than Chet, but we need a guard to pair with Scottie moving forward.


i am not sure I would call 4 guys (Scottie, OG, Pascal, Precious) a glut when there are 5 positions on the floor and each of these guys could play 3 different positions and scottie and pascal can play all 5 .


They really can't play Center, nobody except Precious can and guard is also more questionable although feasible for Scottie in the future. But you could very well argue all 4 have their best position at SF/PF.
Spida888
Starter
Posts: 2,335
And1: 1,862
Joined: Mar 05, 2021
 

Re: [Jake Fisher] The word surrounding OG Anunoby’s trade candidacy 

Post#580 » by Spida888 » Fri Jun 3, 2022 4:40 pm

Who do you guys think has the higher upside: Precious or OG? At the beginning of the season, I would think OG without a question, but now I lean towards Precious based on what he's shown in the 2nd half of the season.

Precious is already a really good defender, but offensively he's out of control and needs more reps. Nice thing is he'll be a RFA after his rookie contract and we're more likely to keep him long term. With OG there's no guarantee he'll stay.

I'm not saying we HAVE to trade OG, but rather if we do get a good offer, it doesn't concern me as much knowing we have Precious.

I still think we won't trade OG this season because of Fred and Gary's contract situations. We probably try to extend OG next season, and if he declines, we may trade him then albeit he may have less value then.

Return to Toronto Raptors