S.W.A.N wrote:S.W.A.N wrote:Brinbe wrote:The Coward stuff is sort of funny to me because without the draft hype and sheen all I see is an Alan Anderson sort of scoring guard. Not to say he won't be vastly better or is more athletic but people always sort of overhype scoring guards to a degree. The stuff he was doing against that quality of competition looked good aesthetic-wise but most 2guards in the league can score and are athletic so those things won't be anywhere near pronounced. So what are you left with once reality hits and he's just a 21-year-old rookie who isn't really doing anything that special?
Well, if he's a better Alan Anderson that's a good player. What if he's more Kris Middleton than Alan Anderson?
Sample size is small but here's the college stats for Anderson Vs Coward
26.6 4.5 8.1 .556 0.8 2.0 .385 3.8 6.2 .611 .603 3.5 3.9 .877 1.8 3.7 5.6 1.7 1.0 0.2 1.6 2.7 13.2
33.0 5.7 10.2 .557 2.0 5.0 .400 3.7 5.2 .710 .656 4.3 5.2 .839 1.8 5.2 7.0 3.7 0.8 1.7 2.2 2.7 17.7
for apples to apples here is the per40 numbers
MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% eFG% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
877 6.8 12.2 .556 1.1 3.0 .385 5.7 9.3 .611 .603 5.2 5.9 .877 2.8 5.6 8.4 2.6 1.5 0.3 2.5 4.1 19.9
198 6.9 12.3 .557 2.4 6.1 .400 4.4 6.3 .710 .656 5.3 6.3 .839 2.2 6.3 8.5 4.4 1.0 2.0 2.6 3.2 21.4
Actually fairly similar. Coward had the better shooting numbers, assists and blocks. Everything else similar. Worth noting, Coward significantly higher volume 3 point shooter.
Watching Game Theory tonight... Guess who Sam is considering putting in his top 10!
Alan Anderson?
