ImageImageImageImageImage

Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

User avatar
Ditchweed
Starter
Posts: 2,327
And1: 89
Joined: Jun 03, 2011
Location: somewhere around 80 miles south of Minneapolis

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#61 » by Ditchweed » Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:45 pm

If the players do hold out, guess I'll be watching: the AFL (Australian Football League) for Australian rules football, the IPL (India Professional League) for cricket, various rugby leagues, Euroball, eastern European handball, polo, and of course the Euro cup next year.

After that, I guess I'll be watching the NBA replacement player league.

BTW ...as a point of interest, the total number of fans watching the IPL probably exceeds the number of NBA fans. They have a lot over there out of the 1.2 billion people in the country. Those Bollywood cheerleaders are unique. GO MUMBAI INDIANS!!!! :D
DG88
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 39,160
And1: 29,969
Joined: Jul 26, 2008
Location: You don't know my location but I know yours
     

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#62 » by DG88 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:31 pm

I might have to start watching hockey again ugh. At least we will be able to watch Valanciunas :D
Image
AkelaLoneWolf
RealGM
Posts: 18,126
And1: 13,654
Joined: Apr 09, 2008

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#63 » by AkelaLoneWolf » Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:10 am

dagger wrote:My position on the talks, which is pro-owner, stems from our experiences here in Toronto.

When I think of all the stranded money we've had to put up with - Hakeem, Zo, Murray, Rose, Alvin, Yogi - it cripples a franchise and the paying customers and other fans suffer more than the owners. During the Babcock years, shortly after the Carter trade, we had literally 50% of our salary cap allocated to permanently disabled (or so they claimed) players like Zo, or to egregiously overpaid players like Rose. There has to be a way to get rid of this, which has had me thinking about regular amnesties where a player might get, say, 75 cents on the remaining dollars and be free to sign as a free agent to make some of that up. For regular amnesties to occur, players would have to make overall concessions so teams can fund the writeoffs.


Why are you pro-anyone? This fight's between owners and players and who gets a bigger share of the pie. Fans have no vested interest here. We won't see lower ticket prices or an overall better product. There is the off chance that Miami Heat type teams won't be created anymore, but lest we forget, the three stars on that team signed for a collective $43.2 million this year. Even the limit of a hard cap is probably going to be much higher.
"We're the middle children of history. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our great war is a spiritual war. Our great depression is our lives." - Tyler Durden in Fight Club.
Visceral
Banned User
Posts: 1,499
And1: 3
Joined: May 06, 2011

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#64 » by Visceral » Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:16 am

Can someone fill me in because I'm clueless.

If there is a lockout, is there a very good chance we still play 45 games or something? Or is there a good possibility no games at all are played?

I'm confused on this. And when would it start/end?
DG88
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 39,160
And1: 29,969
Joined: Jul 26, 2008
Location: You don't know my location but I know yours
     

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#65 » by DG88 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:18 am

Update on CBA talks
http://www.nba.com/video/channels/nba_t ... ef:nbahpt2

NEW YORK -- The latest round of NBA bargaining talks began Friday morning with a flood of about 40 players into the meeting in midtown Manhattan wearing identical gray T-shirts over their street clothes. The message, in bold yellow type beneath a silhouette of multiple players standing shoulder-to-shoulder on the front: "STAND / 2011 NBPA Summer Meeting NYC."

With the threat of a lockout looming once the current collective bargaining agreement expires Thursday, it was important to the players both to express their togetherness and to actually attend a session in the process of proposals and counter-proposals that will decide their professional fates.
"The message is just solidarity," said Billy Hunter, executive director of the National Basketball Players Association.
That's what STAND meant when the day began. Nearly five hours later, as owners, players, lawyers and staffers scattered for the weekend, it might have been shorthand for:
Still Talking, Although No Deal.

http://www.nba.com/2011/news/06/24/asch ... ef:nbahpt1
Image
AkelaLoneWolf
RealGM
Posts: 18,126
And1: 13,654
Joined: Apr 09, 2008

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#66 » by AkelaLoneWolf » Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:26 am

Visceral wrote:Can someone fill me in because I'm clueless.

If there is a lockout, is there a very good chance we still play 45 games or something? Or is there a good possibility no games at all are played?

I'm confused on this. And when would it start/end?


It starts on July 1st unless there's an agreement because that's when the current CBA expires.

When does it stop: when both sides come to an agreement (and they're too far apart rite now).
Last time around I think the season started in Jan/Feb and they played limited games. If the lockout extends into late Feb/March there's no real point of having a season.
"We're the middle children of history. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our great war is a spiritual war. Our great depression is our lives." - Tyler Durden in Fight Club.
User avatar
RapsFanInOhio
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,600
And1: 5,391
Joined: Apr 21, 2009
       

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#67 » by RapsFanInOhio » Sat Jun 25, 2011 2:29 am

DG88 wrote:Update on CBA talks
http://www.nba.com/video/channels/nba_t ... ef:nbahpt2

NEW YORK -- The latest round of NBA bargaining talks began Friday morning with a flood of about 40 players into the meeting in midtown Manhattan wearing identical gray T-shirts over their street clothes. The message, in bold yellow type beneath a silhouette of multiple players standing shoulder-to-shoulder on the front: "STAND / 2011 NBPA Summer Meeting NYC."

With the threat of a lockout looming once the current collective bargaining agreement expires Thursday, it was important to the players both to express their togetherness and to actually attend a session in the process of proposals and counter-proposals that will decide their professional fates.
"The message is just solidarity," said Billy Hunter, executive director of the National Basketball Players Association.
That's what STAND meant when the day began. Nearly five hours later, as owners, players, lawyers and staffers scattered for the weekend, it might have been shorthand for:
Still Talking, Although No Deal.

http://www.nba.com/2011/news/06/24/asch ... ef:nbahpt1

I know that's an NBA.com article and video but that gives me a lot more hope that a deal is going to get done. I'm an NFL fan too and I've paid attention to their negotiations and the NBA sides seem like they're at least trying to negotiate; in early NFL discussions there was a lot of anger and frustrations that were expressed in the media. With the NBA, the sides seem determined to get a deal done and aren't getting frustrated it seems like. They're taking a more professional approach.

Everyone is worked up about July 1st, but the owners don't have to lock out the players yet. I don't know that they'll even lock them out - we could just see the owners push to get a deal done. The players seem to want to negotiate too since many of them showed up today. That's encouraging.
Image
Props to Turbo_Zone for the sig
User avatar
ayo_23
Veteran
Posts: 2,784
And1: 164
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
Location: HELLO!
 

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#68 » by ayo_23 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:22 am

If there is no season at all and it goes straight to the draft... and assuming they use the records of the past 3 seasons to create the new draft lottery... It would be like this...

1. Minnesota
2. Sacramento
3. Washington
4. New Jersey
5. LA Clippers
6. Golden State
7. Toronto
8. Detroit
9. New York
10. Indiana
11. Philadelphia
12. Memphis
13. Charlotte
14. Milwaukee

Seeing this... i hope there's a shortened season.
DG88
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 39,160
And1: 29,969
Joined: Jul 26, 2008
Location: You don't know my location but I know yours
     

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#69 » by DG88 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:34 am

ayo_23 wrote:If there is no season at all and it goes straight to the draft... and assuming they use the records of the past 3 seasons to create the new draft lottery... It would be like this...

1. Minnesota
2. Sacramento
3. Washington
4. New Jersey
5. LA Clippers
6. Golden State
7. Toronto
8. Detroit
9. New York
10. Indiana
11. Philadelphia
12. Memphis
13. Charlotte
14. Milwaukee

Seeing this... i hope there's a shortened season.

Prime spot to get Kabongo :D
Image
Visceral
Banned User
Posts: 1,499
And1: 3
Joined: May 06, 2011

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#70 » by Visceral » Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:41 am

Kabongo is literally the worst last name in the history of time. Can't take it seriously.

Harrison Barnes please.
MinnyMo
Starter
Posts: 2,381
And1: 34
Joined: Jul 28, 2008

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#71 » by MinnyMo » Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:52 am

ayo_23 wrote:If there is no season at all and it goes straight to the draft... and assuming they use the records of the past 3 seasons to create the new draft lottery... It would be like this...

1. Minnesota
2. Sacramento
3. Washington
4. New Jersey
5. LA Clippers
6. Golden State
7. Toronto
8. Detroit
9. New York
10. Indiana
11. Philadelphia
12. Memphis
13. Charlotte
14. Milwaukee

Seeing this... i hope there's a shortened season.


They should just use this years current order, except make it so Clippers, Cleveland and Washington can't win the lottery after winning it already
inonba
Pro Prospect
Posts: 995
And1: 472
Joined: Jan 10, 2009

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#72 » by inonba » Sat Jun 25, 2011 4:31 am

MinnyMo wrote:
ayo_23 wrote:If there is no season at all and it goes straight to the draft... and assuming they use the records of the past 3 seasons to create the new draft lottery... It would be like this...

1. Minnesota
2. Sacramento
3. Washington
4. New Jersey
5. LA Clippers
6. Golden State
7. Toronto
8. Detroit
9. New York
10. Indiana
11. Philadelphia
12. Memphis
13. Charlotte
14. Milwaukee

Seeing this... i hope there's a shortened season.


They should just use this years current order, except make it so Clippers, Cleveland and Washington can't win the lottery after winning it already


If that was the case, Miami will win the lottery. It's rigged...remember?
User avatar
Too Late Crew
Head Coach
Posts: 6,302
And1: 750
Joined: Jun 09, 2008
Location: Nova Scotia

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#73 » by Too Late Crew » Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:53 am

dagger wrote:
Too Late Crew wrote:The players are going to need to take less, the weathiest teams are going to have to make a little less $ to share out to some other teams. Its really as simple as though 2 things


You're dead on. But getting from here to there won't be easy. Nobody will make big moves until it begins to hurt. That won't happen until owners have arena and staff bills to pay with no revenue coming in and players miss a pay cheque. That means October


Ah but owners are not in the same positon as players. The owners do have income even if there is a lockout. The TV contracts provide revenue even if the season doesn't start on time. Season ticket sales/box leases provide revenue (although they may need to refund later. Depending on the team owners may own the arena and be able to offset lost revenue by getting other users. Revenue from sales of NBA products are still coming in.

The other big difference is that not only do owners have some although greatly reduced) revenues while most players (other than stars with big endorsment contracts) have none..but owners have greatly reduced expenses. Player salaries are a huge portion of their cost there are more than a few teams that will lose less money or make more money with the players locked out. If you were losing $ to start and now all of a sudden you are free of 60 M worth of player salary and a lot of other costs you are actully better off (although that isn't sustainable forever)

The rank and file players on the other hand have 0 revenue since basketbll is their only source of income. Their expenses don't go down during the lockout..actually they go up slightly since they don't have per diem, access to team services 9doctors trainers etc). Many of these guys have no savings.

You are right no one will make a big move until it hurts but it will hurt players a lot sooner than owners.
Boner Champ
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,343
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: MSP
       

Lockout Season: 2012 Draft Lottery 

Post#74 » by Boner Champ » Sat Jun 25, 2011 1:56 pm

No, this is not another thread asking what will happen, because nobody knows.

But I am interested, and have a suspicion that they may turn to the NHL who was in the same situation in 2005, and incidentally, that year, too, had a very strong draft class and was surely as hotly contested as this one will be with all teams wanting a piece of the action.

In that draft, each team was allotted 3 lottery balls before they lost one for each playoff appearance in the previous 3 years or lottery win in the previous 4.

Now, without posting all the results, I calculated that there would be a total of 49 lottery balls, with the Raps being one of 5 teams to have 3 balls (the other 4 include Sacramento, Minny, Golden State, and New Jersey).

The odds of the raps winning, then, are simple to calculate: each ball has very close to a 2% chance of being selected, and so the teams with 3 balls have a 6% chance of winning, the teams with 2: 4%, and 1: 2%.

While it would obviously behoove the Raps to have a season in which we can likely suck enough to improve upon those odds (of course assuming there is no other way in which the league determines draft order), I don't have the math skills to determine what the teams' odds of falling elsewhere in the lottery are?

Would those more mathematically inclined be able to say what our odds of falling in the top-3 are? Top-5, Top-10, etc.?
User avatar
Ditchweed
Starter
Posts: 2,327
And1: 89
Joined: Jun 03, 2011
Location: somewhere around 80 miles south of Minneapolis

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#75 » by Ditchweed » Sat Jun 25, 2011 2:37 pm

RapsFanInOhio wrote:Everyone is worked up about July 1st, but the owners don't have to lock out the players yet. I don't know that they'll even lock them out - we could just see the owners push to get a deal done. The players seem to want to negotiate too since many of them showed up today. That's encouraging.


A lockout is done to put different pressure on the negotiations by one side. If a lockout is not done, the status quo continues, the players continue to get their salaries and nothing really gets done. It is not in the owners favor to do an extension. Keep in mind that if there is a lockout, negotiations will still continue but in a different light.

The players say they want to negotiate, but it seems they really don't. All they do is re-iterate the same stand. They say they will negotiate but won't accept any (significant) changes, well that's not really negotiating. It seems the show up by players is more for player solidarity than to accept change.

The league is dysfunctional and needs major changes. The players will have to accept concessions to help put it right and will eventually have to realize that.
highness
Banned User
Posts: 4,637
And1: 31
Joined: May 20, 2011

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#76 » by highness » Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:49 pm

If there's a lockout for a year does that count as a year off a player's contract?
User avatar
ronleroy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 839
And1: 86
Joined: Jan 09, 2011
Location: Liniverse

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#77 » by ronleroy » Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:51 pm

i would think so, probably won't be a full year, i predict players will cave by x-mas, and the union boss will be fired.
Jeremy Lin > Spartacus
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,905
And1: 9,722
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#78 » by bstein14 » Sun Jun 26, 2011 12:00 am

Players lose money for every game not played(due to the lockout)

Players salary per game is 1/90th of their entire yearly salary (8 preseason + 82 regular season games = 90 total games)

So lets say there is a shorted season with 4 preseason games and 50 regular season games. Players would then get 54/90 of their salary, which is 60%

If the entire season is lost then all the players under contract for that year will lose that money... the following year (if there is a season) they'll be a double group of FA's.
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 21,738
And1: 3,624
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#79 » by Indeed » Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:09 am

Too Late Crew wrote:
dagger wrote:
Too Late Crew wrote:The players are going to need to take less, the weathiest teams are going to have to make a little less $ to share out to some other teams. Its really as simple as though 2 things


You're dead on. But getting from here to there won't be easy. Nobody will make big moves until it begins to hurt. That won't happen until owners have arena and staff bills to pay with no revenue coming in and players miss a pay cheque. That means October


Ah but owners are not in the same positon as players. The owners do have income even if there is a lockout. The TV contracts provide revenue even if the season doesn't start on time. Season ticket sales/box leases provide revenue (although they may need to refund later. Depending on the team owners may own the arena and be able to offset lost revenue by getting other users. Revenue from sales of NBA products are still coming in.

The other big difference is that not only do owners have some although greatly reduced) revenues while most players (other than stars with big endorsment contracts) have none..but owners have greatly reduced expenses. Player salaries are a huge portion of their cost there are more than a few teams that will lose less money or make more money with the players locked out. If you were losing $ to start and now all of a sudden you are free of 60 M worth of player salary and a lot of other costs you are actully better off (although that isn't sustainable forever)

The rank and file players on the other hand have 0 revenue since basketbll is their only source of income. Their expenses don't go down during the lockout..actually they go up slightly since they don't have per diem, access to team services 9doctors trainers etc). Many of these guys have no savings.

You are right no one will make a big move until it hurts but it will hurt players a lot sooner than owners.


Not sure how much the owners are making money from a lockout.
There are maintenance contacts, tax for buildings, marketing, and etc. I don't see why owners are better that way.
As for players, they may have revenue from sponsorship, however, that limited to the star players.

At the end of the lock out, the rich are always the winner, but the poor ones (fans, rookies, borderline players) are there to suffer. So I am not in favor of neither side, since they are rich and want to be richer, they never want to do it for the poor.
Tank Nation
Banned User
Posts: 68
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 27, 2011
Location: Frostback Land

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks discussion thread 

Post#80 » by Tank Nation » Sun Jun 26, 2011 2:23 am

i really hope there isn't a lockout, life without nba wouldn't be the same.

Return to Toronto Raptors