ForeverTFC wrote:vini_vidi_vici wrote:I dont understand what ppl expect a coach to say. Hes not going to kill KL in the media and ofcourse hes going to encourage him, hes 12+% more open looks than vs the RS in the POs. Right now teams are daring this team to beat them on the perimeter, to the extent they are getting more open looks, if they cant hit them you just keep encouraging them to do so. Consequently, if/when they start hitting them, it will open things up theoretically for perimeter drives, PnR, and PostUps.
Agree with you to a point, though not all open shots are created equal.
There are other ways to open up lanes and get easier shots. Whiteside is sinking and staying at the basket. We have exploited this to some degree, and should continue to exploit it even more. Also, we may need to start initiating action somewhere else, and have kyle/demar off-ball to mix up a few possessions. The problem with our O is that it is too predictable right now. Teams are challenging us to take the open perimeter shot, but is that our best course of action right now?
Edit: I agree not all open shots are created equal, but id rather in a macro sense have more open looks than contested ones. Esp at the NBA level.
So I guess my question is what are these other ways??
KL has been miserable off the ball, in fairness aswell as on the ball. DD has been decent, and they are using him off screens, usually around the FT line extended, curling to the rim.
Our O isnt as predictable as ppl make it sound IMO. They got a great look ATO with a Ross off the ball screen 3. They had another interesting elevator set. Ive seen Horns alot. When ppl say its predictable I rarely see them actually talking about plays, they talk in generalities. As we've seen with UDs Offense thread, they throw a myriad of sets and ppl dont recognize them and say ISO ISO ISO, hell I had to argue a PnR wasnt an ISO.
Teams are giving us open 3s aswell, which you didnt note but I assume it was implied. We arent hitting those with regularity either and its been down right abysmal. We know the correlation between them and ORTGs, yet all I read is generic terms like ISOs/etc..
They have had some miserable games shooting FTs and even getting FTAs.
Again going back to my initial Q, what are these ways you see we can get looks?? I see JV as a roller. Ive explained why thats been tough, again not even addressing the obvious roster construct (few great PnR passers on this team). If ppl made suggestions at the very least we can discuss them, but there seems to be few and far between, just they need to change which may have merit if only we had some ideas of how or what.
Nick Nurse is no slouch offensively, our ISO finishes have been very effective, more so than most sets (which may be surprising to most) despite how few they have finished with (again prob surprising, see Ruckus SotD) considering the rest of the league seems to use more. Im not some savant, I dont pretend to have any answers, there are much more enlightened posters on these things, but whats apparent is the same hyperbole ppl are railing against/for is used both ways, and little constructive posts in terms of what can be done.
Its blame the coach for the follies, and ____ should be changed, ______ should get fewer/more touches, without any rationale how to or why this would be effective. Thats where im lost.