Grew wrote:I like Maluach, but the whole thing about how he has barely played basketball is mostly being viewed as a positive, when there is a good chance it's more of a negative.
When you're talking about being top 400 in the world at something, you're generally only going to get there if you start as a child and it's integrated into your being. Maluach is simply never going to be the most skilled or have a top end BBIQ. Him being a genetic freak is why he will be in the league.
As for the difference between him and Chomche. I was thinking earlier in the year, watching dukes backup big, that Chomche probably wouldn't even play on that team. He would be the third string.
Another thing about Chomche is, I didn't like his shot blocking instincts or timing when watching him in summer league. Yet somehow he was leading the gleague in blocks at some point. I have the same kind of feeling about Maluach as a shot blocker, maybe he will be more effective than expected like chomche has been.
I don't think that is fair to say someone won't develop BBIQ or skill. Pascal went from an energy big to a all-NBA type over the course of his career. He started out in seminary school in Africa. A lot of non-North Americans play soccer/football first and I see the benefit in the ability to run and have great footwork/coordination, which Maluach shows.
I think the guys who failed like James Wiseman, Hasheem Thabeet and Mo Bamba might have had motor or health issues and lacked the development support. If Maluach goes to the right program, and he already started well at Duke, then he has the make-up to succeed. By all accounts he is a hard worker, has a great family supporting him, and he looks focused on basketball.
I always felt that Chomche was the worse prospect because he seems much more raw and physically he isn't in the same class as Maluach. It would be pretty wild to have them both on Toronto after their BAL days.