mintsa wrote:Today.
821 cases on only 24,000 tests ??
Should this not be alarming that we were still at the 800 mark with only half the tests done ?
Am I missing something here ?
We should just test less. That way we won't see 800 cases a day.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer
mintsa wrote:Today.
821 cases on only 24,000 tests ??
Should this not be alarming that we were still at the 800 mark with only half the tests done ?
Am I missing something here ?

Steelo Green wrote:Even though you know somehow we all gotta go, as long as we believin' thievin' we'll be leavin' with some kind of dough.
Clay Davis wrote:So... we close gyms and indoor dining but are still at over 800 cases per day? When do we start seeing the ramifications of these measures? Who's going to get blamed next? Pizzamen? Rappers? International students?
Fairview4Life wrote:Clay Davis wrote:So... we close gyms and indoor dining but are still at over 800 cases per day? When do we start seeing the ramifications of these measures? Who's going to get blamed next? Pizzamen? Rappers? International students?
You, specifically.

Steelo Green wrote:Even though you know somehow we all gotta go, as long as we believin' thievin' we'll be leavin' with some kind of dough.
13th Man wrote:execoftheyear wrote:13th Man wrote:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
This was the study that Rand Paul was referring to:
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth masks.
Setting 14 secondary-level/tertiary-level hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam.
Participants 1607 hospital HCWs aged ≥18 years working full-time in selected high-risk wards.
Intervention Hospital wards were randomised to: medical masks, cloth masks or a control group (usual practice, which included mask wearing). Participants used the mask on every shift for 4 consecutive weeks.
Main outcome measure Clinical respiratory illness (CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection.
Results The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.
Conclusions This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.
"cloth mask" is a very vague description. What materials are the masks made of? I think this is more important in determining it's effectiveness.
;t=11s&ab_channel=Dr.JohnCampbell
23:18
This man tests 3 different cloth masks and clearly they vary in effectiveness.
And I don't really see the point in comparing cloth masks to medical grade masks. Obviously medical grade masks are more effective. Cloth masks are more effective than no masks at all so what's your point?
- There are many studies that show the limited effectiveness of cloth masks when it comes to filtering.
- Other studies show that most people aren't wearing the masks properly
- There are no studies that show how many people have their cloth masks machine-washed after daily use. If there were, my guess would be that the number would be extremely low.
- The CDC study showed that 3/4 of the people in their study that were infect always wear masks
People like to look at only one aspect of the cloth mask to base their conclusion on which is pretty silly to me. You need to look overall picture and take everything into account that is relevant. As I've mentioned repeatedly, masks are deemed be somewhat effective in a vacuum but in the real world scenario, are they really? The stats do not show it, especially where people wearing mostly cloth masks.
Clay Davis wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:Clay Davis wrote:So... we close gyms and indoor dining but are still at over 800 cases per day? When do we start seeing the ramifications of these measures? Who's going to get blamed next? Pizzamen? Rappers? International students?
You, specifically.
I blame you, specifically, since I spent the last 10 minutes trying to find that Chuckie Akenz music video where he's chilling with his homies outside Fairview mall![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
EDIT: Nevermind... of course it was the Jane and Finch mall
Yo imagine if you were in the comments section of YouTube back in 2005 hyping the Raptors, saying we're gonna win the chip 14 years from now then get hit with an epidemic that **** the entire province.
Lifes crazy man.
13th Man wrote:execoftheyear wrote:13th Man wrote:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
This was the study that Rand Paul was referring to:
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth masks.
Setting 14 secondary-level/tertiary-level hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam.
Participants 1607 hospital HCWs aged ≥18 years working full-time in selected high-risk wards.
Intervention Hospital wards were randomised to: medical masks, cloth masks or a control group (usual practice, which included mask wearing). Participants used the mask on every shift for 4 consecutive weeks.
Main outcome measure Clinical respiratory illness (CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection.
Results The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.
Conclusions This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.
"cloth mask" is a very vague description. What materials are the masks made of? I think this is more important in determining it's effectiveness.
;t=11s&ab_channel=Dr.JohnCampbell
23:18
This man tests 3 different cloth masks and clearly they vary in effectiveness.
And I don't really see the point in comparing cloth masks to medical grade masks. Obviously medical grade masks are more effective. Cloth masks are more effective than no masks at all so what's your point?
- There are many studies that show the limited effectiveness of cloth masks when it comes to filtering.
- Other studies show that most people aren't wearing the masks properly
- There are no studies that show how many people have their cloth masks machine-washed after daily use. If there were, my guess would be that the number would be extremely low.
- The CDC study showed that 3/4 of the people in their study that were infect always wear masks
People like to look at only one aspect of the cloth mask to base their conclusion on which is pretty silly to me. You need to look overall picture and take everything into account that is relevant. As I've mentioned repeatedly, masks are deemed be somewhat effective in a vacuum but in the real world scenario, are they really? The stats do not show it, especially where people wearing mostly cloth masks.
Basketball_Jones wrote:Clay Davis wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:
You, specifically.
I blame you, specifically, since I spent the last 10 minutes trying to find that Chuckie Akenz music video where he's chilling with his homies outside Fairview mall![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
EDIT: Nevermind... of course it was the Jane and Finch mall
Yo imagine if you were in the comments section of YouTube back in 2005 hyping the Raptors, saying we're gonna win the chip 14 years from now then get hit with an epidemic that **** the entire province.
Lifes crazy man.
lolol never heard of Chuckie Akenz that dude was Toronto famous? Maaaaan. I feel like I missed out. I mean, first bar already he drops the N word, stoopid like the asian Tekashi 69.
Basketball_Jones wrote:Clay Davis wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:
You, specifically.
I blame you, specifically, since I spent the last 10 minutes trying to find that Chuckie Akenz music video where he's chilling with his homies outside Fairview mall![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
EDIT: Nevermind... of course it was the Jane and Finch mall
Yo imagine if you were in the comments section of YouTube back in 2005 hyping the Raptors, saying we're gonna win the chip 14 years from now then get hit with an epidemic that **** the entire province.
Lifes crazy man.
lolol never heard of Chuckie Akenz that dude was Toronto famous? Maaaaan. I feel like I missed out. I mean, first bar already he drops the N word, stoopid like the asian Tekashi 69.

Steelo Green wrote:Even though you know somehow we all gotta go, as long as we believin' thievin' we'll be leavin' with some kind of dough.
execoftheyear wrote:13th Man wrote:execoftheyear wrote:
"cloth mask" is a very vague description. What materials are the masks made of? I think this is more important in determining it's effectiveness.
;t=11s&ab_channel=Dr.JohnCampbell
23:18
This man tests 3 different cloth masks and clearly they vary in effectiveness.
And I don't really see the point in comparing cloth masks to medical grade masks. Obviously medical grade masks are more effective. Cloth masks are more effective than no masks at all so what's your point?
- There are many studies that show the limited effectiveness of cloth masks when it comes to filtering.
- Other studies show that most people aren't wearing the masks properly
- There are no studies that show how many people have their cloth masks machine-washed after daily use. If there were, my guess would be that the number would be extremely low.
- The CDC study showed that 3/4 of the people in their study that were infect always wear masks
People like to look at only one aspect of the cloth mask to base their conclusion on which is pretty silly to me. You need to look overall picture and take everything into account that is relevant. As I've mentioned repeatedly, masks are deemed be somewhat effective in a vacuum but in the real world scenario, are they really? The stats do not show it, especially where people wearing mostly cloth masks.
I'd like to see a study on those people that were infected while wearing masks that shows whether they were asymptomatic, had mild symptoms or had severe symptoms because there's plenty of studies that show viral load is a big factor to consider when it comes to an individual's experience when contracting a virus and having something that covers your face will no doubt reduce that amount upon initial transmission (with some materials obviously more effective than others).
Masks are like any other protective equipment. When you wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle, does this prevent you from getting a head injury? No, but it can significantly reduce the impact and can be the difference between a fatal injury vs a less severe injury. If the rider doesn't wear the helmet properly would you all of a sudden blame the helmet for the head injury and come to the conclusion that all helmets don't work?
Same with masks. Does it prevent you from getting a virus? No, but it can be the difference between having mild to no symptoms vs a more severe case because it can reduce the amount of viral particles you take in (filtration effectiveness obviously depending on the material the mask is made out of). And obviously proper mask handling/usage can affect the effectiveness but this is more on the user rather than the mask itself.
Westside Gunn wrote:Hero wrote:Westside Gunn wrote:how are things looking on the employment front?
I've been laid off for a while now and i dont think things will get any better. i'm ****.
Still getting CERB/EI?
EI
id rather be contributing....
JJWong17 wrote:Westside Gunn wrote:Hero wrote:
Still getting CERB/EI?
EI
id rather be contributing....
I hear ya. Has your workplace opened back up but just haven't called you back or did they close for good? I was at a coffee shop before this and they're open but don't need nearly as much staff since they're only doing takeout right now. I dropped in to say hi and the manager said hopefully they'd extend hours a bit more and I'd be next to be called back. I don't really want to work at a grocery store because it feels a lot riskier than the setup they have at my old place

Steelo Green wrote:Even though you know somehow we all gotta go, as long as we believin' thievin' we'll be leavin' with some kind of dough.
13th Man wrote:execoftheyear wrote:13th Man wrote:
- There are many studies that show the limited effectiveness of cloth masks when it comes to filtering.
- Other studies show that most people aren't wearing the masks properly
- There are no studies that show how many people have their cloth masks machine-washed after daily use. If there were, my guess would be that the number would be extremely low.
- The CDC study showed that 3/4 of the people in their study that were infect always wear masks
People like to look at only one aspect of the cloth mask to base their conclusion on which is pretty silly to me. You need to look overall picture and take everything into account that is relevant. As I've mentioned repeatedly, masks are deemed be somewhat effective in a vacuum but in the real world scenario, are they really? The stats do not show it, especially where people wearing mostly cloth masks.
I'd like to see a study on those people that were infected while wearing masks that shows whether they were asymptomatic, had mild symptoms or had severe symptoms because there's plenty of studies that show viral load is a big factor to consider when it comes to an individual's experience when contracting a virus and having something that covers your face will no doubt reduce that amount upon initial transmission (with some materials obviously more effective than others).
Masks are like any other protective equipment. When you wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle, does this prevent you from getting a head injury? No, but it can significantly reduce the impact and can be the difference between a fatal injury vs a less severe injury. If the rider doesn't wear the helmet properly would you all of a sudden blame the helmet for the head injury and come to the conclusion that all helmets don't work?
Same with masks. Does it prevent you from getting a virus? No, but it can be the difference between having mild to no symptoms vs a more severe case because it can reduce the amount of viral particles you take in (filtration effectiveness obviously depending on the material the mask is made out of). And obviously proper mask handling/usage can affect the effectiveness but this is more on the user rather than the mask itself.
I'm not saying that masks don't work. I wear the cheap blue medical ones that you can buy from Costco and throw them out after every use of up to 4 hrs. At one time I even bought into the hype and got a 3-pack of Adidas cloth masks but have not used them since I know of all the risks that come from wearing cloth masks from poor filtration to a tendency of re-using more than once before throwing into the laundry. If you just want a quick prop to satisfy regulation while running in to pick up some food then sure but I believe that cloth masks do more harm than good overall. This one-way protection theory is also BS imo, but that's a different topic on it's own.
I don't agree with the bike helmet analogy as there is really only one way of wearing a bike helmet or putting on a seatbelt. Unless it's a crappy bike helmet that does not satisfy any safety standards then maybe that could compare to wearing cloth masks.
I think the mistake of the WHO and CDC came early when they were telling everybody not to wear masks due to the shortage of N95 masks. Then once that theory was exposed as BS, they said ok and came out with some guidelines for wearing cheap home-made masks knowing that these are better than nothing in a vacuum. Everyone went out and got cloth masks since they are cheaper than buying disposable ones but not realizing how ineffective they really are in real world conditions.


13th Man wrote:execoftheyear wrote:13th Man wrote:
- There are many studies that show the limited effectiveness of cloth masks when it comes to filtering.
- Other studies show that most people aren't wearing the masks properly
- There are no studies that show how many people have their cloth masks machine-washed after daily use. If there were, my guess would be that the number would be extremely low.
- The CDC study showed that 3/4 of the people in their study that were infect always wear masks
People like to look at only one aspect of the cloth mask to base their conclusion on which is pretty silly to me. You need to look overall picture and take everything into account that is relevant. As I've mentioned repeatedly, masks are deemed be somewhat effective in a vacuum but in the real world scenario, are they really? The stats do not show it, especially where people wearing mostly cloth masks.
I'd like to see a study on those people that were infected while wearing masks that shows whether they were asymptomatic, had mild symptoms or had severe symptoms because there's plenty of studies that show viral load is a big factor to consider when it comes to an individual's experience when contracting a virus and having something that covers your face will no doubt reduce that amount upon initial transmission (with some materials obviously more effective than others).
Masks are like any other protective equipment. When you wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle, does this prevent you from getting a head injury? No, but it can significantly reduce the impact and can be the difference between a fatal injury vs a less severe injury. If the rider doesn't wear the helmet properly would you all of a sudden blame the helmet for the head injury and come to the conclusion that all helmets don't work?
Same with masks. Does it prevent you from getting a virus? No, but it can be the difference between having mild to no symptoms vs a more severe case because it can reduce the amount of viral particles you take in (filtration effectiveness obviously depending on the material the mask is made out of). And obviously proper mask handling/usage can affect the effectiveness but this is more on the user rather than the mask itself.
I'm not saying that masks don't work. I wear the cheap blue medical ones that you can buy from Costco and throw them out after every use of up to 4 hrs. At one time I even bought into the hype and got a 3-pack of Adidas cloth masks but have not used them since I know of all the risks that come from wearing cloth masks from poor filtration to a tendency of re-using more than once before throwing into the laundry. If you just want a quick prop to satisfy regulation while running in to pick up some food then sure but I believe that cloth masks do more harm than good overall. This one-way protection theory is also BS imo, but that's a different topic on it's own.
I don't agree with the bike helmet analogy as there is really only one way of wearing a bike helmet or putting on a seatbelt. Unless it's a crappy bike helmet that does not satisfy any safety standards then maybe that could compare to wearing cloth masks.
I think the mistake of the WHO and CDC came early when they were telling everybody not to wear masks due to the shortage of N95 masks. Then once that theory was exposed as BS, they said ok and came out with some guidelines for wearing cheap home-made masks knowing that these are better than nothing in a vacuum. Everyone went out and got cloth masks since they are cheaper than buying disposable ones but not realizing how ineffective they really are in real world conditions.
Clay Davis wrote:JJWong17 wrote:Westside Gunn wrote:
EI
id rather be contributing....
I hear ya. Has your workplace opened back up but just haven't called you back or did they close for good? I was at a coffee shop before this and they're open but don't need nearly as much staff since they're only doing takeout right now. I dropped in to say hi and the manager said hopefully they'd extend hours a bit more and I'd be next to be called back. I don't really want to work at a grocery store because it feels a lot riskier than the setup they have at my old place
Best of luck broski things will shake up just fine, don't worry
Basketball_Jones wrote:Clay Davis wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:
You, specifically.
I blame you, specifically, since I spent the last 10 minutes trying to find that Chuckie Akenz music video where he's chilling with his homies outside Fairview mall![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
EDIT: Nevermind... of course it was the Jane and Finch mall
Yo imagine if you were in the comments section of YouTube back in 2005 hyping the Raptors, saying we're gonna win the chip 14 years from now then get hit with an epidemic that **** the entire province.
Lifes crazy man.
lolol never heard of Chuckie Akenz that dude was Toronto famous? Maaaaan. I feel like I missed out. I mean, first bar already he drops the N word, stoopid like the asian Tekashi 69.