mdenny wrote:Pointgod wrote:mdenny wrote:
I agree with you on that part. Scotty and #9 would be going the other way. But my main point is that Giannis has alot of leverage in choosing where he goes. This doesn't mean the bucks will have to take any package the selected team offers.
If giannis chooses a team....it's an indication he will extend with them next summer. No team will offer the big package without being on Giannis' shortlist.
I doubt it's true....but if Giannis specifies it must be an Eastern team.....that bodes REALLY well for us. It means OKC/spurs/rockets will NOT put together the package they are capable of (because giannis would be a 2 year rental).
Here’s where I disagree with you. There are lots of teams that could offer a better package than Toronto’s best offer without Barnes for 2 years to convince Giannis to resign. Jimmy Butler tried to play hard ball to get to Phoenix and he ended up going in Golden State. Toronto’s package without Barnes is pretty weak for a player of Giannis’ caliber.
Is it possible you are replying in the wrong thread or to the wrong person? I have never said anything about toronto's package not including Barnes. Butler was different because he was an expiring and the return package was relatively small.
There's gonna be two different type packages a team like OKC would trade for Giannis:
1. The one where they are named to his shortlist (indicating he will extend next summer): something like Chet, IH, multiple picks
2 The one they'd offer if they were specifically NOT included in his shortlist (2 year rental): no chet, less picks.
This is why it DEFINITELY changes the conversation if Giannis gives the bucks a shortlist of say toronto, Brooklyn, Orlando (wants to stay in the east). Effectively, we'd only be bargaining with teams on the shortlist and don't have to worry about the packages that the spurs, thunder can concoct. If giannis still had 4 years left on his contract....it wouldn't matter if he gave them a shortlist. Bucks could simply go with the highest bidder. Giannis would have no leverage.
It's really our only hope.
But to address your point....even if giannis gave the bucks a shortlist of Orlando, Brooklyn, Toronto....I agree with you that Barnes is still gonna be necessary to include.
Yeah the premise of this thread is that Toronto can get Giannis without including Barnes. That’s why I’ve been hammering home that point. If we both agree that Barnes and #9 is the starting point on the short list, I think we’re competitive but it depends on the direction Milwaukee is looking to go in at the end of the day.
Milwaukee with Barnes instead of Giannis is most likely a lottery team and they don’t even have their own pick next year if they’re worse than New Orleans. I could make the same argument with Orlando if Franz is the only piece they’re giving up but Brooklyn has the assets to trade the Pelicans or Trail Blazers for Milwaukee to get their picks back.
I think the point is moot because there’s always teams that would make a trade for Giannis even if they aren’t on the short list. Remember Dame was trying to force his way out of Miami and the Bucks came out of nowhere. These things happen all the time in the NBA.