HiJiNX wrote:ontnut wrote:Grew wrote:Okc in 4 or 5?
That's where I put my money.
OKC just has a counter for everything the Pacers do.
I think the series will be closer than folks think. OKC wins by playing off their D, but that may not be as easy against Indiana because their O is special. They push the ball every possession which won’t allow OKC’s defence to set up as quickly and the Pacers also have a lot of capable three point shooters. Where the Pacers will struggle is the 5 matchup. And that might determine the series. But it won’t be a cakewalk. If the Pacers can protect the ball then they push it to six, maybe even seven games.
Also, in a close game I am much more comfortable with the Pacers playing in the clutch than I am with OKC.
If you do, you should take the over bets on some of the game # totals. They're pretty juicy right now.
OKC held opponents to a league worst 34.1% from 3 during the season. They know how to neutralize the 3p line. IND has been good too, but not as good.
In the playoffs, OKC allows a league low 13.6% transition frequency. They're VERY good at stopping transition. In fact, both teams are excellent at stopping teams in transition. It might become a halfcourt grind it out kind of situation, and in that case, I'm more comfortable with OKC over 4 quarters than I am with IND. OKC simply has more options.
And I agree with you on the 5 matchup - iHart and Chet vs Turner might force the Pacers to eventually go small with Siakam at the 5 vs Chet. That would be really interesting.