TravisScott55 wrote:Koloko was insurance and bloodclots derailed his career, then Chomche was insurance and bloodclots are currently derailing his career
Exactly. These "We did NOTHING!!" posts are cringey asf
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
TravisScott55 wrote:Koloko was insurance and bloodclots derailed his career, then Chomche was insurance and bloodclots are currently derailing his career
Rodrickle wrote:We should try to hit on a 10 day, like Pre gambling Jontay Porter who was actually pretty productive before the scandal. Ibou Badji looks like he has a chance, only 22 right now. 7'8 wingspan. Just dunks, and defends the rim but maybe not a fit for Darko's offense. Still think he can force some turnovers though and overall positively contribute for small minutes

LarSiN wrote:TravisScott55 wrote:Koloko was insurance and bloodclots derailed his career, then Chomche was insurance and bloodclots are currently derailing his career
Exactly. These "We did NOTHING!!" posts are cringey asf
LarSiN wrote:TravisScott55 wrote:Koloko was insurance and bloodclots derailed his career, then Chomche was insurance and bloodclots are currently derailing his career
Exactly. These "We did NOTHING!!" posts are cringey asf
tsherkin wrote:LarSiN wrote:TravisScott55 wrote:Koloko was insurance and bloodclots derailed his career, then Chomche was insurance and bloodclots are currently derailing his career
Exactly. These "We did NOTHING!!" posts are cringey asf
Yeah. Quality centers who are worth a rotation spot aren't easy to find, nor cheap. And cheap options who might work out don't pan out all the time, or even very often. We've tried some things, we just haven't landed on any of them in that regard. So here we are. We've identified a need, but it isn't a simple one to fulfill. We'll keep trying, but we have to work within what we have for the moment.

ConSarnit wrote:That’s because we are capped out. There are viable backup C’s in the $7-10m range we just don’t have the money.
Given what we know about Poeltl (can only play 28mpg) finding a backup C should have been a higher priority. Poeltl is our lowest minutes starter and probably the key piece to our defense. That’s the type of guy you need to carve out cap space for a backup. Instead we have 4 shooting guards.

Thaddy wrote:The new C thing doesn't make sense. Mamu is playing 100% at C and he's killing it.
ConSarnit wrote:LarSiN wrote:TravisScott55 wrote:Koloko was insurance and bloodclots derailed his career, then Chomche was insurance and bloodclots are currently derailing his career
Exactly. These "We did NOTHING!!" posts are cringey asf
Koloko as a near term plan made sense. He was older and showed flashes but couldn’t overcome his health problems.
Relying on Chomche as insurance was a terrible plan. He’s a lottery ticket. Raw 18 year old drafted 57th. The odds of him working out (even without his health problems) are probably 1 in 10. He was not going to be a viable rotation big until year 3 if he EVER even became one at all. Thats not a viable plan for a team that needs a backup C yesterday.
such as..? Who realistically was available in the 7-10M range that is obtainable?ConSarnit wrote:That’s because we are capped out. There are viable backup C’s in the $7-10m range we just don’t have the money.
Have you seen the backups around the NBA actually? Like who is actually worth it? Here is a comprehensive list of guys listed as a "C" on basketball reference, who have came off the bench for 50% or more of their games. Which guys were both:Given what we know about Poeltl (can only play 28mpg) finding a backup C should have been a higher priority. Poeltl is our lowest minutes starter and probably the key piece to our defense. That’s the type of guy you need to carve out cap space for a backup. Instead we have 4 shooting guards.
YogurtProducer wrote:such as..? Who realistically was available in the 7-10M range that is obtainable?ConSarnit wrote:That’s because we are capped out. There are viable backup C’s in the $7-10m range we just don’t have the money.Have you seen the backups around the NBA actually? Like who is actually worth it? Here is a comprehensive list of guys listed as a "C" on basketball reference, who have came off the bench for 50% or more of their games. Which guys were both:Given what we know about Poeltl (can only play 28mpg) finding a backup C should have been a higher priority. Poeltl is our lowest minutes starter and probably the key piece to our defense. That’s the type of guy you need to carve out cap space for a backup. Instead we have 4 shooting guards.
A) obtainable
B) worth itSpoiler:
You are vastly overrating the quality of backups around the NBA.
tsherkin wrote:Thaddy wrote:The new C thing doesn't make sense. Mamu is playing 100% at C and he's killing it.
Offensively, Mamu has been very good for us. Would like to see him get back to the rebounding he was managing the previous 3 years though, because he's rebounding at a guard-like level at the moment. The spacing is wonderful, but he's not a strong defender and he isn't hellaciously athletic. It'd be nice to have a lob threat kind of guy who can do a better job for us on defense when we need it. That's a tall ask, if you'll pardon the pun, but that's probably the reason behind most of the push for a 3rd-string guy. That, and planning for Jak being unhealthy. He's very good, but he hasn't played 60+ games since 2023, and the three years before that, he was also under 70 games. So prepping for his absence is of some importance.

Thaddy wrote:We need shooting so bad that it doesn't matter to me. If a player can stretch the floor and protect the rim/rebound then they are usually expensive all stars. I would say we are kind of forced to build a team where 1-4 can shoot and the 5 is strictly an anchor that rebounds, finishes, and plays high IQ (similar to Jakob). I don't think there's any defensive C in the league that can consistently shoot. Banging down low causes fatigue and that affects shooting.
tsherkin wrote:Thaddy wrote:We need shooting so bad that it doesn't matter to me. If a player can stretch the floor and protect the rim/rebound then they are usually expensive all stars. I would say we are kind of forced to build a team where 1-4 can shoot and the 5 is strictly an anchor that rebounds, finishes, and plays high IQ (similar to Jakob). I don't think there's any defensive C in the league that can consistently shoot. Banging down low causes fatigue and that affects shooting.
Mamu has been very good. I don't think anyone is complaining about him. We're talking about a 3rd-string guy who can pick up minutes when Jak misses games. Jak can't shoot and he works out just fine for us.
Meantime, there are guys who can defend and shoot, but they certainly aren't cheap or easily available, no doubt. Regardless, I don't think it matters, because we're talking more about someone who can replicate a little of what Poeltl does, not so much what Mamu does, and then working with that set.
Thaddy wrote:The new C thing doesn't make sense. Mamu is playing 100% at C and he's killing it.
Kobe Anunoby wrote:Thaddy wrote:The new C thing doesn't make sense. Mamu is playing 100% at C and he's killing it.
It’s nice to see that you’re coming around on manu, after all the doubt you had during the summer (eurobasket)

Thaddy wrote:Another Poeltl is probably something like going for Sharpe on the Nets. I don't really think it's worth moving someone like Agbaji. It seems like he's on the chopping block. I'm guessing we wait for the draft and pick up a project there. Maybe Chomche makes a comeback at some point and comes back to us.
Psubs wrote:Clay Davis wrote:Random, but shouldn't we spell it "centre"?I spell the word as "centre" without even thinking about it, and it always surprises me when I talk with Americans.
I really wonder what caused Jakob to regress over a period of... what, 5 months? Did he get injured training over the Summer? Anyway, if he gets back to being a 15/10 centre, I actually think we'll lowkey have an interesting (not great) centre line-up with CMB/Scottie/Mamu playing small-ball 5 and Jakob playing traditional 5. I think the centre line-up of a team should have a "main" traditional centre, a back-up traditional centre, and a number of 4s who can slot in as small-ball 5s.
He's 30.

Steelo Green wrote:Even though you know somehow we all gotta go, as long as we believin' thievin' we'll be leavin' with some kind of dough.