billy_hoyle wrote:agkagk wrote:billy_hoyle wrote:
Ahhh ic. You don't actually have a value for OG. Just NOT this proposal. Very insightful.
Isaac - valuation by agkagk = non-tendered.
6th overall pick in 2017
Last heathy season at age 22 (in 29 min/g):
11.9 PPG, 6.8 REB, 1.4 AST, 1.6 STL, 2.3 BLK, 0.34 3pt%
WS/48 = 0.120
OG at 22 (in 30 min/g)
10.6 PPG, 5.3 REB, 1.6 AST, 1.4 STL, 0.7 BLK, 0.39 3pt%
WS/48 = 0.134 (followed by 0.104 and 0.101 on increased usage the subsequent 2 yrs)
Health and self creation obviously count in OGs favor, but the actual production and impact (and possibly trajectory?) of Isaac and OG was quite similar prior to the injury.
Basically, I think you are undervaluing the Orl guys.
That said, I typically project full recoveries for these athletes. Durant, Embiid, Steph and his ankles. I think most of these guys come back strong, and are undervalued because of overly conservative risk assessments. I concede that some guys never recover (Brand, Boogie, Porzingis etc.).
Can you offer up a suitable player that you would accept in a trade for OG? I'm curious.
youre trade proposal is garbage, shows little understanding of play evaluations, contract values, both perceived and actual.
you can project full recoveries all you want, but i dont have copies of their xrays or medicals so i cant. I can only go by their production and the cost to resign them based on their current scale deals.
If you think committing to resigning fultz, bamba and issac to 50 - 75 million dollar deals is a good idea, which is what trading og's exceptionally valuable contract for is doing, then good luck and good night!
Merry christmas!
IMO, your rebuttal is garbage.
Not a mention of what OG is worth.
Is he worth all stars only? Super stars? Top 5 pick plus salary ballast?
just admit it, youre secretly an orlando homer.