DutchCanuck wrote:Still a firm believer the worst Trade we made was for Ingram (We lost the Indy Pick this year which is probably a lotto pick and we lost cap flexibility for a best case scenario of being a 5/6 seed or a play in team?
There’s likely a reason that other teams weren’t lining up to pay him what we gave, like his agent said. We conceivably have the same goals and constraints of those teams. Doesn’t strike me as us being smarter, than everyone.
I don’t have a high opinion of Darko as a competent coach, seems like he’s just a nice guy who won’t rock the boat- but if they really want to compete they will likely need more than he can offer, however as long as he’s got a roster with no healthy centres not true starting pg, 6 SG - 4 of them with big team investment or contracts, and have all 3 of our best players at the same position (BI SB, CMB) Darko has a built in excuse.
That being said, the approach to make a team with IQ, RJ and BI in the back court a crazy defensive menace that presses full court for four q’s is grounds for dismissal. The media too. You don’t need to be an expert or former player to see the challenges with the approach, but it goes unmentioned like a fart in the car.
The interest the previous era built will be squandered by the time they dig out if they don’t get deliberate, creative and aggressive, imo.