ItsDanger wrote:Imagine if we didn't trade for Poeltl in a vain attempt to make the playoffs. We would have had a higher pick in 2023, retained our 2024 pick, and be in a similar position currently in 2025 draft.
Doesn't this just mean:
2023 - Maybe we still draft Grady Dick even if we pick a few spots higher. There were other good players in the draft, but unless we get a top 2 pick, I'm not sure we get much better? Amen Thompson is good, but he can't shoot at all, so we'll see how that goes. Lively looks like a great pick, but if the simplest way to compare players is what they'll get paid in the market, he's probably like a 20M type of guy and Grady seems like he'll get there based on his start to this season.
2024 - The big one, as if we'd still made the trades we did and pivoted to a tank, we could probably have drafted a young, cheap center in Clingan who I think will be better than Poeltl on D and that just matters more than offensive play at the position. But maybe we don't make the trades or just move one or 2 of the 3 guys? Lots of variables here. So far it appears to be the very weak draft everyone said it was, so we're probably talking about a 6th man or 4th/5th kind of starter here.
2025 - We probably get a better draft slot via tanking, but so far so good on that score anyways.
So yeah, I think it was definitely a bad trade, but in the end it seems unclear it will actually cost us anything, really. We could probably trade Poeltl right now for a late first rounder and say 10M in bad money next year (which likely won't matter, we'll be over the cap and under the tax regardless) and that late first probably doesn't have a big difference projection-wise from the pick we would have had in 2024.
The only way I see it being a huge problem is if it costs us Flagg this year or we could have gotten a top 2 pick last year and ended up with Wemby (in which case it was a cataclysmic trade) or Brandon Miller (good wings don't grow on trees). And math-wise that's at worse us going from 7.5% up to 14% at getting the Wemby pick (so a 6.5% difference, 1 in 15 or 16 chance) and probably a similar odds of getting Miller at #2 and let's tack on a 2-3% for the tank this year.
So yeah, if we assume we still make the Siakam/OG deals and let Van Vleet go (otherwise we're getting into a whole other debate), odds are it cost us having Clingan, Edey or another rookie in a weak 2024 class. Save like 12M at the position and more importantly get younger to closer match Barnes and what will hopefully be a very good 2025 rookie's timelines. That sucks. If Masai can't find a good center to be the successor at the spot by the time Poeltl expires (Chomche has great speed and is normal sized for a center, but obviously so raw at actually playing that odds are against him) it will matter more, and we'll probably have to burn a first down the line to get a starting center, or use a pick we could have used on another position.
TLDR: Bad trade, probably didn't kill us. Ranked well behind picking Flynn over Bane and probably right around the "surely we could have trade Van Vleet at the deadline for a pick, why didn't we?" move in terms of lost value, which I'd put at around a pick in the mid-late teens in a normal draft, whereas the Bane pick for example is like a 4 first round picks level mistake (what it feels like would be a fair deal to acquire him if Memphis wanted to save money and ship him to us, for example, for Bruce Brown and Boucher's expiring and picks. Maybe it's 5? 3 seems low.).