BoyzNTheHood wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:BoyzNTheHood wrote:We won’t. Masai isn’t that stupid. He won’t even take him if we fall to 10.
I agree that he wouldn't take him top 3 (I think he would still take Ace in that scenario, just too much potential to pass on and will continue to fit next to Scottie no matter what decision BI might make in a few years time) buuut I don't agree that he wouldn't take him if we fell to 10, I really don't know but there's no way I rule it out.
I understand that we all have our preferences and players we don't want but we literally just brought in Chomche who wasn't anywhere remotely near as "highly touted" as Khaman. Chomche didn't even play in a respectable league before entering the league and is on another level of rawness even from Khaman. So I don't rule out that Masai takes a kid that got recruited to the top program in college to be their starter and did a solid job at it with plenty of physical tools. Again I get it if you don't like him personally, that's fine & fair, we don't have to all love the same prospects but I just doubt that Masai has completely ruled him out especially when we know how much it means to him personally to see African born players make it (and I'm not saying that to be critical of him, it's just true).
The thing is, I bet Chomche can be as impactful as Maluach is at the NBA level, and also he was picked at the end of the 2nd round so he was much lower risk than a raw kid in the top 10.
No doubt a lower risk but I just don’t agree on them being as impactful at the heights of their potential. I think Khaman has much more touch in the paint and in his jumper as a whole since he has much better mechanics/release point and won’t need to alter his shot like Ulrich who shoots the ball low and in front of his face. Chomche doesn’t even really understand how to navigate a PnR to be a constant lob threat as yet etc but his overall development and feel is still well behind despite both being raw.
I’m not even advocating for taking Maluach because right now I’d prefer Queen or Fears. But I do think people are writing him off a bit too much and either downplaying or maybe haven’t watched as closely some of things he does do well or at least has the potential to. But he is a better prospect than Chomche as it stands now in this moment and I just can’t rule out Masai seeing some of the same potential in him that made a program like Duke go out of their way to recruit or why he’s a prospect that multiple scouts and analysts put a top 10 grade on since they’ve put eyes on him. Surely there’s “something” people see in him and I’m just not ready to believe that a guy like Masai that takes very personal interest in seeing African prospects succeed, write off the top prospect since the last big one they had (although he’s obv not the same level).
I'd also add that Khaman's overall court awareness is far ahead of Chomche's. I already pointed out how he doesn't even understand when to roll or how to navigate through traffic for screens but you also see it on the defensive end. Ulrich's lone "strength" at this point is specifically his on-ball/man defence (pause), he has the size & lateral speed to literally guard 1-5 and if he can almost lockdown if he iso'd on but the second you add a PnR, he's lost and taking it further he's the back line of the defence that should be calling out picks and understanding where guys are cutting to/from and he doesn't have the slightest clue schematically what's happening. Khaman still obv needs to continue to get better but he's way ahead in that regard. I've actually seen him try to point out or even nudge guys where to be. Again he's not perfect at that, doesn't always read it right but still miles ahead there. So while both raw, Khaman still is starting with a greater overall skillset & understanding of the game.