PhilBlackson wrote:Reeko wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:
Said it earlier but I don't think he's quite as quick. I think he's going to have to develop more strength & develop his ballhandling bag even more to create space like Kyrie does to be as effective offensively as Beal.
He's got some nice wiggle to his game. Based on the HoopIntellect video I saw, he seems pretty promising on defense and his playmaking looks pretty good. If we were to draft him, I'd like him more as our SG of the future than Trent.
Oh WITHOUT QUESTION!
It's know its a bit repititive that he may not be quite an exact replica of Beal, but he will imo at minimum be as good as if Gary had handles & better shot creation ability which would be a completely different level player & at least a near all-star level type of player lol. All I'm saying is I'm not sure he's quite
as lights out of a scorer as Beal (remember he's put up 30ppg in a season more than once...) although his potential is definitely higher than Gary's as an overall scorer. But Gary with a bag lol (I know how funny that sounds) that would be a pretty damn good SG. I just think to get to Beal's level as a scorer, he'll need to do so by adding strength and a more advanced handle to compensate for the difference in quickness but the skills are there...
My only thing is would that player quite be enough to truly contend?! I think it would be fun & very close but not quite IT. I do think the team needs a superstar scorer (SGA, KD etc) to truly get over the hump. Idk if you just injected even Beal like player with more solid defence is still quite enough tbh maybe I'm wrong. But all in all, I obviously wouldn't complain lol it would still be fun af to be a far more competitive team moving forward!
Scoot is the only guy I view as potentially being a generational superstar type of player. Maybe Wemby is too, that's what everyone keeps telling me, but I'm just terrified by the potential for injuries given his height. I say this because I think we get too focused on drafting a superstar that can take us to the promised land. Drafting that type of player is so rare, in the last 22 years how many guys could you say are that type of player? LeBron, Wade, Durant (I'll maintain is debatable until he wins one without Steph), Rose (maybe if not for injuries), Curry, Kawhi, Butler (arguable if he'd had an exceptional supporting cast, which he kind of did in Philly), Lillard (again very arguable), Giannis. Jokic, Tatum, Doncic, Morant, Zion all remain to be seen but many believe they are at that level or can get to that level.
So that's 5 players in 22 years of of the draft that we know for sure could win a title as the top dog of a team, 6 if you want to include Durant. 4 other players who might've been able to if they were placed in more advantageous situations, 3 if you don't include Durant. And 5 guys who we think might be able to ascend to that level but who have yet to prove that they're that guy.
14 guys in the last 22 years who have been, might've been, or may be legit #1 options for a title team. Of course for the more recent draftees a lot of that is still up in the air, but so far none of them have made an impact in the way a Luka has. In those 22 years, approximately 1320 players have been drafted.
So that mentality of "we've gotta find our #1 option for the title team" might as well go out the window because that is way more dependent on luck than anything.