Choker wrote:Calderon wrote:JamesNaismith wrote:Clearly, Memphis is a big spender looking to flirt with the salary cap hence all the talk of them being a major player in this FA season *insert sarcasm* --- again Memphis has terrible attendance, bad finance and arent big spenders.
Get a clue.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. There are these things called "contracts" in the NBA, right? And they *expire* every so often, right? Memphis had 14.5 million dollars in "contracts" *expire* at the end of the season. Following me? So they are 14.5 million dollars richer than when they wanted to obtain Ellis back in the middle of last season. Here is where it gets really interesting. Ellis' contract is <14.5 (that sign means smaller than). So they could absorb his contract and STILL have less money committed than when they wanted him during the season! Let me know if any of that went by a little fast for you. On top of that, they now have Mayo and the number 6 pick to deal for a point guard! Do you think that would be enough to net them a decent 1? I think it just might. Jussssst maybe. And hey, if they are as cheap as you are ignorant, they could let Gay walk and sign Brewer for cheapsies.
Do you guys not understand even after the 4th post - Memphis does not spend; they are cheap, they have the second lowest payroll because the owner chooses not spend year after year because Memphis as a city does not do a good ROI aka make them very profitable if they start hovering around the cap.
LOL
That is why they are under the cap.
That ramble would apply to teams willing to spend; the Grizzlies are not one of them.
I swear you guys are slow.