gamer4Life wrote:Danny1616 wrote:Chad_Warden wrote:You're right. Results are results. And results for players (as opposed to teams) are measured by stats. And VC's stats in the 2001 playoffs were WAY better than Lowry's stats in the 2016 playoffs. Hell, VC put up better stats in the 2000 playoffs than Lowry in the 2016 playoffs.
Nobody here argued that Carter is not a better offensive threat then Lowry.
Lowry is easily the better 'overall' player. I never said he's the better offensive player. That is why is he leads the playoffs in deflections, loose ball recoveries and is among the leaders in taking charges. Until last nights game he led the playoffs in point net differential, highlighting how valuable he is in the league.
The value of someone is measured in dollars during free agency. 2001 VC would command max salary from every team in the league. Can't say the same for Lowry if he were a free agent this off season.
Congradulations. You just posted the dumbest post of the day. If your strictly just looking at the money a player makes in FA to determine their value, you're clueless af. Does DMC and TT ring a bell for you?