xavis wrote:Anyone get the sense that if JV puts up 16/10 numbers this year, his trade value will be high enough to nab someone like Butler at the deadline (obviously have to include more)?
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100
xavis wrote:Anyone get the sense that if JV puts up 16/10 numbers this year, his trade value will be high enough to nab someone like Butler at the deadline (obviously have to include more)?
bballsparkin wrote:xavis wrote:Anyone get the sense that if JV puts up 16/10 numbers this year, his trade value will be high enough to nab someone like Butler at the deadline (obviously have to include more)?
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
xavis wrote:bballsparkin wrote:xavis wrote:Anyone get the sense that if JV puts up 16/10 numbers this year, his trade value will be high enough to nab someone like Butler at the deadline (obviously have to include more)?
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
Alternatively if OG explodes this year and puts up 10+PPG with stellar defence he could be a huge trade chip. But at that point would we even want to let him go?
Red_Claw wrote:xavis wrote:bballsparkin wrote:
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
Alternatively if OG explodes this year and puts up 10+PPG with stellar defence he could be a huge trade chip. But at that point would we even want to let him go?
I get the impression that the same people wwho prefer to tank and start with a blank slate also suggest that we get rid of all our longterm assets to make the "big push" for a championship. Neither is good stategy.
Getting rid of an improving OG, someone who "could" fill Kawhi's shoes if he leaves is just dumb. Especially when you have him on a rookie contract for 3 more years.
xavis wrote:Red_Claw wrote:xavis wrote:
Alternatively if OG explodes this year and puts up 10+PPG with stellar defence he could be a huge trade chip. But at that point would we even want to let him go?
I get the impression that the same people wwho prefer to tank and start with a blank slate also suggest that we get rid of all our longterm assets to make the "big push" for a championship. Neither is good stategy.
Getting rid of an improving OG, someone who "could" fill Kawhi's shoes if he leaves is just dumb. Especially when you have him on a rookie contract for 3 more years.
I don't know if it's dumb, it depends on what the GM wants (short term or long term). If we got Butler for OG and we ended up winning a championship in the short term, most wouldn't see it as dumb. However, I still would be reluctant to include him in any trade (if he was playing really well).
Red_Claw wrote:xavis wrote:Red_Claw wrote:
I get the impression that the same people wwho prefer to tank and start with a blank slate also suggest that we get rid of all our longterm assets to make the "big push" for a championship. Neither is good stategy.
Getting rid of an improving OG, someone who "could" fill Kawhi's shoes if he leaves is just dumb. Especially when you have him on a rookie contract for 3 more years.
I don't know if it's dumb, it depends on what the GM wants (short term or long term). If we got Butler for OG and we ended up winning a championship in the short term, most wouldn't see it as dumb. However, I still would be reluctant to include him in any trade (if he was playing really well).
"IF we win a championship....."
What if we don't? What if we under achieve? Would it have been worth giving away our entire future?!
but i do see your point about OG specifically and if he were the only piece to have to trade to bring in an all star, maybe i would react differently but thats not the case here. We would have to give up alot more. Some even suggest adding our up an up and coming center who is our primary (only) rebounder who can handle big minutes.
Best case scenarios are easy to imagine. Its being able to forsee the worst case thats a real skill.
xavis wrote:Alternatively if OG explodes this year and puts up 10+PPG with stellar defence he could be a huge trade chip. But at that point would we even want to let him go?
bballsparkin wrote:xavis wrote:Anyone get the sense that if JV puts up 16/10 numbers this year, his trade value will be high enough to nab someone like Butler at the deadline (obviously have to include more)?
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
PHANTOMPHOENIX wrote:bballsparkin wrote:xavis wrote:Anyone get the sense that if JV puts up 16/10 numbers this year, his trade value will be high enough to nab someone like Butler at the deadline (obviously have to include more)?
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
That is because he is a bad fit for KAT. I really don't understand these trade offers including JV to Minny. As if Minny is going to ship out KAT to accommodate JV.
Ibaka is a better fit for Minny because he can defend 4/5 and gives them some rim protection, basically he would defend whoever KAT does not want to defend.
I am not saying Ibaka would get you Butler, just that he is a better fit for KAT and would only have 1 more year of salary at the trade deadline.
Also at the trade deadline, Butler is basically 3 month rental so I don't expect a great package from any team.
bballsparkin wrote:xavis wrote:Anyone get the sense that if JV puts up 16/10 numbers this year, his trade value will be high enough to nab someone like Butler at the deadline (obviously have to include more)?
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
Asif16 wrote:bballsparkin wrote:xavis wrote:Anyone get the sense that if JV puts up 16/10 numbers this year, his trade value will be high enough to nab someone like Butler at the deadline (obviously have to include more)?
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
I think its the opposite. KAT's game is transitioning more and more to the perimeter.
There's also complaints among wolves fans that KAT doesnt like playing defense and guarding the other team's C's. Thats why he's such a mediocre rebounder. Minnesota might do well by having Val do all the dirty work and have KAT play PF full time
Rapcity_11 wrote:Asif16 wrote:bballsparkin wrote:
He seems like a bad fit for KAT.
I think its the opposite. KAT's game is transitioning more and more to the perimeter.
There's also complaints among wolves fans that KAT doesnt like playing defense and guarding the other team's C's. Thats why he's such a mediocre rebounder. Minnesota might do well by having Val do all the dirty work and have KAT play PF full time
KAT had a 30.9% DRB last year. #4 in the NBA. Mediocre? LOL
Clutch0z24 wrote:Wouldnt mind taking a flyer on Waiters who might come cheap and hes on a 3 year deal....Maybe he can develop here like Oladopo did in Indiana...
Maybe a deal like Powell/Wright for Waiters....Kinda would hate losing Wright but hes about to become a free agent and with KL/Fvv being here long term hes kind of out of position playing the SG position....
Waiters is a natural SG and can score in various ways (Something we are lacking is a shot creator/Maker)
he was playing great before the injury
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
mirrornick wrote:I would give OJ Mayo a chance. http://www.williamsondailynews.com/sports/o-j-mayo-hoping-for-second-chance-in-nba-this/article_3e9c359d-18f9-5670-bc1e-af70d135628b.html
Only 30 years old yet he's a vet.
xavis wrote:mirrornick wrote:I would give OJ Mayo a chance. http://www.williamsondailynews.com/sports/o-j-mayo-hoping-for-second-chance-in-nba-this/article_3e9c359d-18f9-5670-bc1e-af70d135628b.html
Only 30 years old yet he's a vet.
If he's been keeping in shape I'd give him a chance too. He was decent when he started (he got worse as the years went on), but you never know?
mirrornick wrote:xavis wrote:mirrornick wrote:I would give OJ Mayo a chance. http://www.williamsondailynews.com/sports/o-j-mayo-hoping-for-second-chance-in-nba-this/article_3e9c359d-18f9-5670-bc1e-af70d135628b.html
Only 30 years old yet he's a vet.
If he's been keeping in shape I'd give him a chance too. He was decent when he started (he got worse as the years went on), but you never know?
He played overseas and I am sure he is motivated to return to the NBA after 2 years.
xavis wrote:mirrornick wrote:xavis wrote:
If he's been keeping in shape I'd give him a chance too. He was decent when he started (he got worse as the years went on), but you never know?
He played overseas and I am sure he is motivated to return to the NBA after 2 years.
Wikipedia says he played in Puerto Rico.
"Mayo started 18 of his 21 appearances with the team, shooting just 39.0 percent from the field and 34.7 percent from beyond the arc. He also averaged 13.4 points, 3.9 rebounds, 3.5 assists and 1.1 steals."
Honestly I can't see him taking minutes from Norm, but it would be an interesting option.
Doesn't seem like his numbers are that great to justify a roster spot. I mean we have VanVleet, Lowry, Green, Powell, Wright and Miles all as back court players. I can't see Mayo as better than any one of those guys. Mayo isn't really a SF as well and his defense isn't that great, IDK seems like a waste of a spot to me especially for a cap strapped team.xavis wrote:mirrornick wrote:xavis wrote:
If he's been keeping in shape I'd give him a chance too. He was decent when he started (he got worse as the years went on), but you never know?
He played overseas and I am sure he is motivated to return to the NBA after 2 years.
Wikipedia says he played in Puerto Rico.
"Mayo started 18 of his 21 appearances with the team, shooting just 39.0 percent from the field and 34.7 percent from beyond the arc. He also averaged 13.4 points, 3.9 rebounds, 3.5 assists and 1.1 steals."
Honestly I can't see him taking minutes from Norm, but it would be an interesting option.
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry