Raps in 4 wrote:The Raptors have the worst expected vs. actual point differential over a 4-year span in playoff history. It isn't even close (actual point differential is -60.5).
We even had a negative point differential in many of the series we won. We only had a positive point differential in 3/9 series.
https://nba.nbcsports.com/2018/06/12/raptors-playoff-problems-run-much-deeper-than-lebron-james/Do people see now why some of us are calling for a rebuild? Do people get why we're the laughingstock of the NBA? The American media and players don't make fun of us because they hate us. They make fun of us because we're legitimately bad.
I forget who originally posted this in one of the Nurse threads. It got buried, so i thought I'd repost it for more visibility.
It boils down to the fact that we have played LeBron 3 times and that offense has been our biggest playoff issue prior to this season. Prior to this season our ORtg dropped significantly from the regular season to the playoffs (around 8-9 points). This year our ORtg finally held up from the regular season to the playoffs (something Nurse has pointed out).
If you look series-by-series, our DRtg in the playoffs has been good against every team except Cleveland. For whatever reason our defensive schemes are completely ineffective against LeBron (that's another discussion). Over the past 3 years our DRtg has been ~15, ~18, and ~14 points worse against Cleveland than the other teams we faced in the playoffs; in two of those years the Cavs had the best ORtg in the playoffs.
If you look at other teams in the past four years that faced the Cavs in the 2nd round or later (so you can make a series-by-series comparison) the same pattern exists:
- Atlanta's DRtg was ~27 and ~10 points worse against the Cavs than other teams they faced in the 2015 and 2016 playoffs.
- In 2016-2017, Boston's DRtg was ~21 points worse against the Cavs than against the Bulls and Wizards.
Having a negative net rating in a series you win just speaks to consistency. The truth is we have only had
one winning series in the past 3 years with a negative net rating, not "many" as you suggest. Also, winning a series with a negative net rating is not a unique "problem" to Toronto. Just this year Boston had a negative net rating in 1/2 series they won. Cleveland had a negative net rating in 1/3 series they won.
The reality is that this team's ceiling has been the ECF but that was always assuming we didn't meet LeBron in an earlier round. Given that, should we be shocked that we lost to the Cavs? No. Would it be nice if the last two years we had been more competitive? Of course, especially when we see how Indiana and Boston went 7 games. Can we acknowledge, however, that in the 6 games Indiana and Boston won against Cleveland only 1 was actually competitive?
People point to Toronto being blown out by 18 and 35 as evidence of how bad the Raptors are. You can't do that without recognizing how bad the Cavs played in five of their losses to Indiana and Boston. Cleveland was blown out by 18 and 34 against Indiana and by 25, 13, and 13 against Boston.