hankscorpioLA wrote:Concerned_Fan wrote:I don't get why struggling NCAA programs don't just pluck from the G-League more. Poach a progressive G-League coach or low assistant from the NBA ranks, offer a large salary and a longer contract. There's got to be a lot of Nick Nurse's or Nevada Smith's sitting on G-League benches or as assistants/coordinators on NBA teams.
There are so many NCAA teams still walking the ball up and pounding the ball like it's 1993 and jacking up fallaway jumpshots. Or running terribly overcomplicated motion offenses that lead to turnovers and forced shots.
You can't tell me some of these struggling programs wouldn't do better with a coach that utilized advanced metrics into the offense, and loaded up on guards and undersized forwards bigger NCAA programs overlooked. D.III and JUCO programs are full of 5'9-6'3 gunner combo guards, there have got to be some in China, Latin America and Europe. How many NCAA shooting guards and small forwards can consistently isolate and post-up an undersized guard anyways to do enough damage? We see legit NBA SGs fail to post Fred Van Vleet when Raptors run their 2 PG combo.
It's a skill problem. Most NCAA teams do not have the kinds of shooters and playmakers you need to run that kind of offense. And you often only have players for a year so you can't teach complex schemes.
If it's a skill problem, then you want to play that style more. If you have less 5 star recruits, I get the "fewer possessions" thing, because more possessions means more chances for the other teams to score (the Princeton offense philosophy). But you can also go the other way and say shooting more 3's and shooting in volume increases risk variance (Daryl Morey's philosophy).
Also, motion offenses are complex - many big NCAA programs run extremely complicated schemes. It's run & gun systems that are simple. The beauty in D'Antoni's offense is its simplicity.
The big NCAA programs get all the 5 star recruits. All the 6'5 athletic wings, anyone above 6'7 that can play basketball.
The small NCAA programs are left with guards that weren't recruited to these schools. And maybe 1 guy over 6'7 that can only rebound and can't get up the floor that well. But there's a whole dearth of skilled guards under 6'3 that big DI programs pass on, because they aren't as naturally athletic or look like Trae Young. They have high basketball IQs and good shots though (Steve Nash went to a small DI program).
You're telling me a smaller NCAA program that trots out Jeremy Lin and Fred Van Vleet in the backcourt at SG/PG, that plays a run & gun style of play wouldn't have above-average success? They'd both have huge numbers.
Some of these schools get walk-ons and 2nd, 3rd year transfers from JUCO too. So they have to integrate a lot of new players. No time to get them use to a complex Bobby Knight motion offense or a Coach K 5 out.