We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- HeadtopChunes
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,319
- And1: 10,224
- Joined: Apr 04, 2017
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
Honestly you still got to consider it, especially if Davis is willing to commit immediately (no he stay/he gone)
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,428
- And1: 17,155
- Joined: Jan 05, 2012
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
HeadtopChunes wrote:Honestly you still got to consider it, especially if Davis is willing to commit immediately (no he stay/he gone)
Interesting day to wear your pointy hat.
Everybody is losing their freaking minds. Nutbars and wingnuts have infested this forum. We've become a public lavatory without cleaning staff.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- Clay Davis
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,496
- And1: 6,694
- Joined: Nov 06, 2013
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
Here's an argument made purely from a meta-game perspective:
If your goal is to compete for a championship, it's better to have a team with salary spent on Siakam than on AD.
You have to go all the way back to 2011 to find a team whose best player was a big man. You can even stretch the restrictions a bit and ask how many finals series have had a traditional big man included in the list of top 3 players from either team. You could make arguments for players like Kevin Love, Chris Bosh, and Draymond Green being the third best player in a given series but it's always an argument made with the tacit assumption that they are on a tier below Lebron and whoever else is occupying his ilk (it has included Curry, KD, D Wade, RW, and Dirk). That's not to say there aren't excellent, elite big men: AD and Demarcus are some of the best players of this era, but the fact is that a team built around a big man won't be extremely successful. This isn't to say that they aren't extremely skilled and extremely impactful, but their skills don't fit the way the game is played and their impact is not enough to make the team that could be built around them extremely competitive. You can have a Demarcus or an AD and you'll get 30/10/5 from them on a good night, but you probably won't be getting lights out shooting from the other 4 positions and efficient iso scoring. It's not easy to build an elite team in this pace-and-space era with so much salary spent on a player who doesn't jack up the pace and doesn't space the floor.
AD is a much better player than Siakam. I won't argue otherwise. Siakam, however, is better at certain things that are more valuable, such as switching on defense and spacing the floor. Taken in isolation, this doesn't mean much, but when you're considering that you've got 4 other players on the court who benefit more from Siakam's skill-set than AD's and when you consider that they'll be paid more than an analogous team with AD, it's a straight-forward matter of saying that Siakam is better to have on your team because it's easier to optimize the other variables to produce a team that's better than what you could construct with AD.
If your goal is to compete for a championship, it's better to have a team with salary spent on Siakam than on AD.
You have to go all the way back to 2011 to find a team whose best player was a big man. You can even stretch the restrictions a bit and ask how many finals series have had a traditional big man included in the list of top 3 players from either team. You could make arguments for players like Kevin Love, Chris Bosh, and Draymond Green being the third best player in a given series but it's always an argument made with the tacit assumption that they are on a tier below Lebron and whoever else is occupying his ilk (it has included Curry, KD, D Wade, RW, and Dirk). That's not to say there aren't excellent, elite big men: AD and Demarcus are some of the best players of this era, but the fact is that a team built around a big man won't be extremely successful. This isn't to say that they aren't extremely skilled and extremely impactful, but their skills don't fit the way the game is played and their impact is not enough to make the team that could be built around them extremely competitive. You can have a Demarcus or an AD and you'll get 30/10/5 from them on a good night, but you probably won't be getting lights out shooting from the other 4 positions and efficient iso scoring. It's not easy to build an elite team in this pace-and-space era with so much salary spent on a player who doesn't jack up the pace and doesn't space the floor.
AD is a much better player than Siakam. I won't argue otherwise. Siakam, however, is better at certain things that are more valuable, such as switching on defense and spacing the floor. Taken in isolation, this doesn't mean much, but when you're considering that you've got 4 other players on the court who benefit more from Siakam's skill-set than AD's and when you consider that they'll be paid more than an analogous team with AD, it's a straight-forward matter of saying that Siakam is better to have on your team because it's easier to optimize the other variables to produce a team that's better than what you could construct with AD.
Steelo Green wrote:People are expecting way too much from Barnes out of the get go. He is a project player who will need 2-3 years before he makes a major impact.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,490
- And1: 1,815
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
HeadtopChunes wrote:Honestly you still got to consider it, especially if Davis is willing to commit immediately (no he stay/he gone)
No one in their right mind would say no to a re-signed AD for Siakam
Likewise, no one in their right mind would say yes to a non-commital AD
Since AD committing is not even remotely possible, there isn't much to discuss here
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- HeadtopChunes
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,319
- And1: 10,224
- Joined: Apr 04, 2017
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
COY0607 wrote:HeadtopChunes wrote:Honestly you still got to consider it, especially if Davis is willing to commit immediately (no he stay/he gone)
No one in their right mind would say no to a re-signed AD for Siakam
Likewise, no one in their right mind would say yes to a non-commital AD
Since AD committing is not even remotely possible, there isn't much to discuss here
yeah, that's the main issue at hand.
AD is a superior player, but a bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush.
Although I wouldnt say "not remotely possible" , i think if Leonard stays it be pretty possible.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- macNcheese3
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,213
- And1: 6,915
- Joined: Jul 04, 2015
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
Screw AD. I love seeing a guy we drafted doing so well.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,048
- And1: 4,705
- Joined: Nov 25, 2013
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
even at the same salary I take Siakam over AD and I don't think at all about it.
If you guaranteed AD would be healthy there might be a discussion
If you guaranteed AD would be healthy there might be a discussion
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,574
- And1: 3,235
- Joined: Jan 30, 2018
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
J-Roc wrote:Siakam won't become Giannis folks. He's great, but he's not a #1 star guy. Also, if we get AD and then Kawhi bails, we can trade AD to start the rebuild we always planned on anyway.
And this expert opinion is based on???? What exactly ?
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- JackedFinancier
- Starter
- Posts: 2,319
- And1: 3,902
- Joined: Oct 10, 2010
- Location: South Beach, FL
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
Yallbecrazy wrote:even at the same salary I take Siakam over AD and I don't think at all about it.
If you guaranteed AD would be healthy there might be a discussion
I just think the evolution of Siakam is mind blowing. It's astonishing. It's honestly otherworldly. So yes - at this current moment - I would have to think about trading Siakam for AD which is just outrageous. Maybe I think differently once the playoffs are over in terms of how Siakam plays from here on out - but the progression I see from him is on another level - so I wouldn't put it past him to improve even more.
I think he could use a nice face up jump shot, I think he could use a pull up jump shot and I also think he could use an off the dribble 3 - that would make him absolutely unstoppable.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- J-Roc
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,149
- And1: 7,550
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: Sunnyvale
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
His style of game. Lack of midrange. I'm enjoying what he's getting done right now with less pressure. He'll end up being our #1 guy soon enough but that doesn't mean a team with him as #1 would be a contender.Raps1103 wrote:J-Roc wrote:Siakam won't become Giannis folks. He's great, but he's not a #1 star guy. Also, if we get AD and then Kawhi bails, we can trade AD to start the rebuild we always planned on anyway.
And this expert opinion is based on???? What exactly ?
Sent from my SM-G955W using RealGM mobile app
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,536
- And1: 3,187
- Joined: Dec 29, 2005
- Location: Jurassic Park
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
If Anthony Davis is signed to a decent deal day 4/$140 million you trade Pascal Siakam for him 10/10 times. Davis is a MVP and DPOTY level player. I get Pascal has been really good but if you can pair both Leonard and Davis with Danny Green Lowry and whatever we have left it's a win-win scenario
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,063
- And1: 563
- Joined: Jun 29, 2009
- Location: TO
- Contact:
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
[quote="StopitLeo”]
Smaller moves may improve the team but they won't provide a legitimate second scoring option nor a monster defensive player. AD isn't a rental until next year so he can be flipped for assets, the very same ones people are saying NOP should hold out until the offseason to get. We traded DeRozan - as much as the organization strives for a certain culture it is still a business. The team with the best players tend to win.[/quote]
Yeah, I mostly agree with you about everything, I just wonder how available Jrue Holiday is; he’s a player I would describe as a defensive monster. If Durant leaves the Warriors, I think a Siakm, Lowry, and Jrue trio would be more than enough as occasional second options. I’d be happy with this if Durant left to NY and got paired with Kemba Walker. Maybe even Kyrie if they can’t fill the rest of the roster. My biggest problem with a trade for Jrue would be that it would likely mean NO traded AD to pair up with Durant or Kyrie in Boston or NY. By not trading for AD we could very well be creating the next super team in NY, Boston, or LA.i would still trade anything for a year of Gasol, AD, Kawhi, Green, and Lowry.
Smaller moves may improve the team but they won't provide a legitimate second scoring option nor a monster defensive player. AD isn't a rental until next year so he can be flipped for assets, the very same ones people are saying NOP should hold out until the offseason to get. We traded DeRozan - as much as the organization strives for a certain culture it is still a business. The team with the best players tend to win.[/quote]
Yeah, I mostly agree with you about everything, I just wonder how available Jrue Holiday is; he’s a player I would describe as a defensive monster. If Durant leaves the Warriors, I think a Siakm, Lowry, and Jrue trio would be more than enough as occasional second options. I’d be happy with this if Durant left to NY and got paired with Kemba Walker. Maybe even Kyrie if they can’t fill the rest of the roster. My biggest problem with a trade for Jrue would be that it would likely mean NO traded AD to pair up with Durant or Kyrie in Boston or NY. By not trading for AD we could very well be creating the next super team in NY, Boston, or LA.i would still trade anything for a year of Gasol, AD, Kawhi, Green, and Lowry.
TurboZ
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- kai_bouche
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,953
- And1: 10,166
- Joined: Jul 08, 2010
- Location: Tdot (**** the 6ix)
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
Another one year rental drama.
AD stay!
sign me up.
Also sorry to burst your bubble but we are beating Goliath state Warriors and Kawhi is staying
AD stay!
sign me up.
Also sorry to burst your bubble but we are beating Goliath state Warriors and Kawhi is staying
Kingsway_fan wrote:Lol boucher in two minutes.. 2 blocks, 2 pts, 2 ribs, 1 stl
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,288
- And1: 13,757
- Joined: Feb 20, 2017
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
Are you high!!! AD is a top 5 player in this league. People get caught up in the moment a just say nonsense after big victorys. AD is oneof the best players in this league period! You're not getting AD for pascal straight up anyways. As good as pascal has become. He's still not at AD's level. Just stop the nonsens! This is why NBA fans laugh at this fan base.
There's stars and then there's superstars! Pascal is on his way to becoming a star. Ad is a superstar in this league. These guy love to embarrass this fan base with stupidity.
There's stars and then there's superstars! Pascal is on his way to becoming a star. Ad is a superstar in this league. These guy love to embarrass this fan base with stupidity.
“Elephant in the room : Nick Thibodeau” Board member seanbig
"THEY'RE SAYING US AND GOLDEN STATE ARE THE SUPER TEAMS" Knicks PG Derrick Rose
"THEY'RE SAYING US AND GOLDEN STATE ARE THE SUPER TEAMS" Knicks PG Derrick Rose
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 913
- And1: 1,249
- Joined: Oct 06, 2015
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
RaptorsNorth wrote:Are you high!!! AD is a top 5 player in this league. People get caught up in the moment a just say nonsense after big victorys. AD is oneof the best players in this league period! You're not getting AD for pascal straight up anyways. As good as pascal has become. He's still not at AD's level. Just stop the nonsens! This is why NBA fans laugh at this fan base.
There's stars and then there's superstars! Pascal is on his way to becoming a star. Ad is a superstar in this league. These guy love to embarrass this fan base with stupidity.
AD is top 5 injured player for sureeeee. Injury prone. Siakam runs laps over this guy. It’s not all about flashy plays. AD is kind of like Kyrie Irving they get injured they talk about how good they are and then they can’t win on there own. They need someone better then them to carry them. Siakam played basketball for like 7 years... idk for the injury chance alone I don’t know if I want AD or Kyrie.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 804
- And1: 1,086
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
I'd want nothing to do with AD or Rich Paul after watching the nonsense in New Orleans this year. I also don't trust AD's body lasting through a max deal.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,288
- And1: 13,757
- Joined: Feb 20, 2017
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
I'm not wasting anymore time in this thread on this topic after this post. There's sense and then there's nonsense. AD is a top 5 player in the league. Denver won't even do jokic for pascal, much less AD for pascal smh. This is just ridiculous to even waste anymore time discussing any farther. Come on guys let's get real here for a sec.
“Elephant in the room : Nick Thibodeau” Board member seanbig
"THEY'RE SAYING US AND GOLDEN STATE ARE THE SUPER TEAMS" Knicks PG Derrick Rose
"THEY'RE SAYING US AND GOLDEN STATE ARE THE SUPER TEAMS" Knicks PG Derrick Rose
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- SHFT
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,189
- And1: 4,956
- Joined: Mar 09, 2012
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
The only way i include spice in a package for AD is if Davis is healthy and has at least 2 yrs left because its Anthony freaking Davis lol.
But since neither are true, then no.
Sent from my LG-H915 using RealGM mobile app
But since neither are true, then no.
Sent from my LG-H915 using RealGM mobile app
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
- v1n5anity
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,968
- And1: 3,059
- Joined: Nov 02, 2003
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
I like Siakam's game more. He's becoming like a Giannis-lite. He's only getting better whereas AD has peaked and is always injured. What has AD exactly accomplished with the Pels/Hornets ever since he got in the league as the team's go-to-guy? He's also become a diva and I don't want no part of that. Kawhi's more than enough tbh.
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,490
- And1: 1,815
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Re: We CANNOT Trade Siakam for AD (Deep Thoughts)
HeadtopChunes wrote:COY0607 wrote:HeadtopChunes wrote:Honestly you still got to consider it, especially if Davis is willing to commit immediately (no he stay/he gone)
No one in their right mind would say no to a re-signed AD for Siakam
Likewise, no one in their right mind would say yes to a non-commital AD
Since AD committing is not even remotely possible, there isn't much to discuss here
yeah, that's the main issue at hand.
AD is a superior player, but a bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush.
Although I wouldnt say "not remotely possible" , i think if Leonard stays it be pretty possible.
If Leonard stays, I would imagine Siakam is likely one of the selling points. So that takes AD off the table
And I don't think Leonard is the type of guy (LeBron) who would push to disrupt team chemistry for a superior player with baggage