Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,551
- And1: 26,487
- Joined: Oct 16, 2006
- Location: Toronto, ON
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Bring Him Home?
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- TheBoi10
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,553
- And1: 11,891
- Joined: Apr 13, 2018
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Bankai wrote:Bring Him Home?
I hope Casey and DeBumzan continue to lose in those dumps while we continue to win championships
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- Johnny Bball
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,230
- And1: 48,792
- Joined: Feb 01, 2015
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Raptors fans endlessly blamed the Raptors Organization and Casey for James Johnson not being very good. Well this is what it takes, this is the level you have to go to, to get James Johnson to be an average player. Pretty safe to say he never took it seriously here.
https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/255559/Heat-Banish-James-Johnson-For-Not-Meeting-Conditioning-Requirements
https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/255559/Heat-Banish-James-Johnson-For-Not-Meeting-Conditioning-Requirements
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- dTox
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,312
- And1: 15,596
- Joined: Jan 26, 2007
- Location: Basement
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Johnny Bball wrote:Raptors fans endlessly blamed the Raptors Organization and Casey for James Johnson not being very good. Well this is what it takes, this is the level you have to go to, to get James Johnson to be an average player. Pretty safe to say he never took it seriously here.
https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/255559/Heat-Banish-James-Johnson-For-Not-Meeting-Conditioning-Requirements
Erik Spoelstra praised Johnson just one day ago.
"He’s been very serious about his work this summer," Spoelstra said. "You can see it in our conditioning day. He did a great job with that. He’s a unique two-way player in his ability to guard one through five when he's healthy and facilitate and make other players better from a hybrid frontcourt position is unique. He's coming in healthy."
lol
TBZ for the win
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- Westside Gunn
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,102
- And1: 6,077
- Joined: Jul 03, 2016
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
i miss the days when the bricks was only nineteeeeeeeen, i need a 100 right now
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- LuDux1
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,914
- And1: 4,042
- Joined: Mar 22, 2009
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
"That was tasty, right? I hit that joint and hang there"
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- Kabookalu
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,103
- And1: 70,114
- Joined: Aug 18, 2006
- Location: Long Beach, California
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- Kabookalu
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,103
- And1: 70,114
- Joined: Aug 18, 2006
- Location: Long Beach, California
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,954
- And1: 17,786
- Joined: Feb 24, 2007
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Kabookalu wrote:
We traded this guy for someone whom I can not even remember his name.
Did the salary saved really make that much difference to the bottom line?
Maxpainmedia:
"NYC has the **** most Two Faced fans, but we ALL loved IQ,, and that is super rare, I've been a Knicks fan for 37 years, this kid is a star and he will snap in Toronto"
"NYC has the **** most Two Faced fans, but we ALL loved IQ,, and that is super rare, I've been a Knicks fan for 37 years, this kid is a star and he will snap in Toronto"
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,258
- And1: 4,260
- Joined: Mar 25, 2012
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Dennis 37 wrote:Kabookalu wrote:
We trade this guy for someone who I can not even remember his name.
Did the salary saved really make that much difference to the bottom line?
Maybe, dumping Bruno allowed us to avoid tax that season, and then we went into the tax for the first time last season and got a Championship out of it. Who knows, maybe if the Grizz cut him (he is partial contract I believe) we can always bring him back
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,954
- And1: 17,786
- Joined: Feb 24, 2007
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Raptorfan2012 wrote:Dennis 37 wrote:Kabookalu wrote:
We trade this guy for someone who I can not even remember his name.
Did the salary saved really make that much difference to the bottom line?
Maybe, dumping Bruno allowed us to avoid tax that season, and then we went into the tax for the first time last season and got a Championship out of it. Who knows, maybe if the Grizz cut him (he is partial contract I believe) we can always bring him back
Based on that highlight package, he looks better than a couple players we gave guaranteed contracts to.
Maxpainmedia:
"NYC has the **** most Two Faced fans, but we ALL loved IQ,, and that is super rare, I've been a Knicks fan for 37 years, this kid is a star and he will snap in Toronto"
"NYC has the **** most Two Faced fans, but we ALL loved IQ,, and that is super rare, I've been a Knicks fan for 37 years, this kid is a star and he will snap in Toronto"
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,805
- And1: 8,890
- Joined: May 25, 2016
- Location: Paris
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Dennis 37 wrote:Raptorfan2012 wrote:Dennis 37 wrote:We trade this guy for someone who I can not even remember his name.
Did the salary saved really make that much difference to the bottom line?
Maybe, dumping Bruno allowed us to avoid tax that season, and then we went into the tax for the first time last season and got a Championship out of it. Who knows, maybe if the Grizz cut him (he is partial contract I believe) we can always bring him back
Based on that highlight package, he looks better than a
couple players we gave guaranteed contracts to.[/quot
He would start for us at the 3, and be the perfect complement to pascal, sadly....
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,170
- And1: 7,497
- Joined: Mar 03, 2009
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Dennis 37 wrote:
Based on that highlight package, he looks better than a couple players we gave guaranteed contracts to.
I bet Bruno wanted out so he could get some minutes. He's looking good though agreed.
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- Kevin Willis
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,432
- And1: 7,941
- Joined: Apr 17, 2009
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- Kabookalu
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,103
- And1: 70,114
- Joined: Aug 18, 2006
- Location: Long Beach, California
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
bballsparkin wrote:Dennis 37 wrote:
Based on that highlight package, he looks better than a couple players we gave guaranteed contracts to.
I bet Bruno wanted out so he could get some minutes. He's looking good though agreed.
Some games he's looked awful, but they're experimenting with him seeing if he can be the backup 5. It hasn't worked out at all, he doesn't have the bruiser mentality required from a center, but he's looked a lot better again when they slide him to the 4.
I'd much rather have him than Stanley Johnson and Rondae Hollis Jefferson.
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- PT416
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,809
- And1: 6,243
- Joined: Feb 01, 2012
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
We went from Kawhi Leonard to dreaming about Bruno Caboclo.
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- Mikistan
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,412
- And1: 38,388
- Joined: Jun 30, 2008
- Location: Shamblesland
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Kevin Willis wrote:
What is even going on here?
The first 3 mins are so disjointed, bodies hitting the floor, people jawing at one another, players not starting plays in the right places...
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- Kevin Willis
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,432
- And1: 7,941
- Joined: Apr 17, 2009
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Mikistan wrote:Kevin Willis wrote:
What is even going on here?
The first 3 mins are so disjointed, bodies hitting the floor, people jawing at one another, players not starting plays in the right places...
I know!! They don't look that good at all. Lakers look way more polished, that team lacks facilitators. Lakers have Rondo, Lebron and I guess Caruso. Portland, GSW, Houston, Denver, Utah all have good backcourts. They will look messed up to start the season.
Ska needs to make a comeback.
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
- ItsDanger
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,841
- And1: 22,042
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
Kawhi 5/19 vs Dallas in Vancouver, clippers looking shaky so far.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 67,356
- And1: 31,627
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Re: Former Raptor discussion thread 2.0
It's preseason.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.