720 wrote:Ackshun wrote:720 wrote:What in the troll reply is this? Nurse literally said that in the post draft press conference. Admit what L? It was a bad trade. Going from 20 to 33 for an old role player is ass no matter the "immediate help" he provided. Speaking of L's aren't you the same guy that said we don't need/want a center and that we're going all forwards? Shhhhh bozo.
The reality is, nobody here knows if it was a bad trade or not. If Branham ends up a top 5 player in the future, and our guy is out of the league, then we may have a better answer.
I didn't like trading back because I think the pick would have increased in value closer to the draft. And maybe, we scoop up another established younger player to fit our trajectory. But that's just me guessing. No way of knowing. Either way, FO wanted a vet presence and Thad is a pretty good player to learn from so I'm not losing sleep.
People are making it more complex than it is (like saying we have to wait it out and see which prospects become good players, etc.).
At the end of the day, the 20th pick, for a second rounder at 33 and a 34 year old role player is a bad trade. Especially if the role player isn’t some final piece to a championship team. All we had to do was keep the pick and choose at 20. Anyways it’s no big deal now, it happened and let’s move on.
Yeah true. Why wait for certainty to emerge when we can just argue about what may or may not occur.
Anyhow, like I said I didnt like the trade. I would have kept it as trade bait as part of a bigger package. But if Masai and Bobby value vet presence over the pick, then that is their perogative.