Gradey, Walter & Brown. Who plays?
Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2024 9:25 pm
All will be healthy soon.
Someone’s not getting mins @ sg
Someone’s not getting mins @ sg
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=2418610
PhilBlackson wrote:You forgot Ochai.
Personally I would start Gradey but I think they'll pick Ochai because of his defence. But I hope he comes off the bench at both SG & SF, then once JaKobe gets his conditioning and rhythm back, JW can back up at SG, Ochai at SF and don't care about Brown, I'm not buying he's gonna do much (if anything) for his trade value. Teams either still keep the memory of him in DEN dear or they don't lol but him getting a lay up here or there won't do anything.
Psubs wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:You forgot Ochai.
Personally I would start Gradey but I think they'll pick Ochai because of his defence. But I hope he comes off the bench at both SG & SF, then once JaKobe gets his conditioning and rhythm back, JW can back up at SG, Ochai at SF and don't care about Brown, I'm not buying he's gonna do much (if anything) for his trade value. Teams either still keep the memory of him in DEN dear or they don't lol but him getting a lay up here or there won't do anything.
Still don't get why they picked up Brown's overpaid team option?
They can pick up a 1st pick by taking on $6 million in extra salary. Like Kira Lewis. Use the OKC / Sean Marks BK trades.
Only reason is to go after players that make over $30 million and I don't see anyone worthy.
Tripod wrote:Psubs wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:You forgot Ochai.
Personally I would start Gradey but I think they'll pick Ochai because of his defence. But I hope he comes off the bench at both SG & SF, then once JaKobe gets his conditioning and rhythm back, JW can back up at SG, Ochai at SF and don't care about Brown, I'm not buying he's gonna do much (if anything) for his trade value. Teams either still keep the memory of him in DEN dear or they don't lol but him getting a lay up here or there won't do anything.
Still don't get why they picked up Brown's overpaid team option?
They can pick up a 1st pick by taking on $6 million in extra salary. Like Kira Lewis. Use the OKC / Sean Marks BK trades.
Only reason is to go after players that make over $30 million and I don't see anyone worthy.
Keeping Brown essentially allowed them to keep an asset to punt down the road another year.
Who knows if it ends up being worth anything but Masai likes to keep options open.
With how good last off-season went with draft and trades, let's see if he has a great follow-up trade deadline.
PhilBlackson wrote:Tripod wrote:Psubs wrote:
Still don't get why they picked up Brown's overpaid team option?
They can pick up a 1st pick by taking on $6 million in extra salary. Like Kira Lewis. Use the OKC / Sean Marks BK trades.
Only reason is to go after players that make over $30 million and I don't see anyone worthy.
Keeping Brown essentially allowed them to keep an asset to punt down the road another year.
Who knows if it ends up being worth anything but Masai likes to keep options open.
With how good last off-season went with draft and trades, let's see if he has a great follow-up trade deadline.
Yeah I have to agree about keeping Brown ALTHOUGH I do remember EARLY ON hearing rumblings that we were offered a 24' FRP for BUT that Masai wanted a 25' and since then Brown has been in & out of the lineup with injury (obv out all of this year so far)....
Putting that aside, there really wasn't a great free agent class so having cap space was rather pointless so as a worst case scenario we saved our cap space for possibly better free agents this coming off season AND we'll have a better feel for what types of players we should be signing to better fill out the roster. The additional time also helps some of the teams flirting with the lux tax and tax aprons a bit more time to sweat and think what are they willing to part with to keep A LOT more money in their pockets.
In the end I think if the Raps get a trade for him, I'm doubtful they'll get a 25' as they had hoped/prayed but heck when I see how Masai finessed the Kings for Davion & Shead, who knows?! lol But my personal guess is if he is traded it's to a team like the Lakers for someone like Rui or maybe to the Nets + the IND pick for Cam Johnson (not saying that's what I'd want, I'd rather keep the pick tbh).
But I think they'll end up trying (not sure they'll be successful doing so) to find a younger-ish, win now type of player that will start setting them up to either sadly make a Play In run this BUT hopefully not where instead they have them join a group of players with mysterious "injuries" to end the season.
Tripod wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:Tripod wrote:Keeping Brown essentially allowed them to keep an asset to punt down the road another year.
Who knows if it ends up being worth anything but Masai likes to keep options open.
With how good last off-season went with draft and trades, let's see if he has a great follow-up trade deadline.
Yeah I have to agree about keeping Brown ALTHOUGH I do remember EARLY ON hearing rumblings that we were offered a 24' FRP for BUT that Masai wanted a 25' and since then Brown has been in & out of the lineup with injury (obv out all of this year so far)....
Putting that aside, there really wasn't a great free agent class so having cap space was rather pointless so as a worst case scenario we saved our cap space for possibly better free agents this coming off season AND we'll have a better feel for what types of players we should be signing to better fill out the roster. The additional time also helps some of the teams flirting with the lux tax and tax aprons a bit more time to sweat and think what are they willing to part with to keep A LOT more money in their pockets.
In the end I think if the Raps get a trade for him, I'm doubtful they'll get a 25' as they had hoped/prayed but heck when I see how Masai finessed the Kings for Davion & Shead, who knows?! lol But my personal guess is if he is traded it's to a team like the Lakers for someone like Rui or maybe to the Nets + the IND pick for Cam Johnson (not saying that's what I'd want, I'd rather keep the pick tbh).
But I think they'll end up trying (not sure they'll be successful doing so) to find a younger-ish, win now type of player that will start setting them up to either sadly make a Play In run this BUT hopefully not where instead they have them join a group of players with mysterious "injuries" to end the season.
Personally given we have our 1st + Port#2, I would be fine if we just tried to keep building up the future pipeline.
We know if we move Brown a player or 2 are coming back. One we likely waive or move to another team. Other we keep. If we could get a 1st in 2027....lottery protected...fine by me.
Try this year by trading Brown and Boucher to add more assets to 2027/2028.
At least this year the product on the court is exciting to watch all while you can see improvements across the board. And might actually have a pipeline of kids coming year after year as cheap contracts are always going to he welcome.
PhilBlackson wrote:Tripod wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:
Yeah I have to agree about keeping Brown ALTHOUGH I do remember EARLY ON hearing rumblings that we were offered a 24' FRP for BUT that Masai wanted a 25' and since then Brown has been in & out of the lineup with injury (obv out all of this year so far)....
Putting that aside, there really wasn't a great free agent class so having cap space was rather pointless so as a worst case scenario we saved our cap space for possibly better free agents this coming off season AND we'll have a better feel for what types of players we should be signing to better fill out the roster. The additional time also helps some of the teams flirting with the lux tax and tax aprons a bit more time to sweat and think what are they willing to part with to keep A LOT more money in their pockets.
In the end I think if the Raps get a trade for him, I'm doubtful they'll get a 25' as they had hoped/prayed but heck when I see how Masai finessed the Kings for Davion & Shead, who knows?! lol But my personal guess is if he is traded it's to a team like the Lakers for someone like Rui or maybe to the Nets + the IND pick for Cam Johnson (not saying that's what I'd want, I'd rather keep the pick tbh).
But I think they'll end up trying (not sure they'll be successful doing so) to find a younger-ish, win now type of player that will start setting them up to either sadly make a Play In run this BUT hopefully not where instead they have them join a group of players with mysterious "injuries" to end the season.
Personally given we have our 1st + Port#2, I would be fine if we just tried to keep building up the future pipeline.
We know if we move Brown a player or 2 are coming back. One we likely waive or move to another team. Other we keep. If we could get a 1st in 2027....lottery protected...fine by me.
Try this year by trading Brown and Boucher to add more assets to 2027/2028.
At least this year the product on the court is exciting to watch all while you can see improvements across the board. And might actually have a pipeline of kids coming year after year as cheap contracts are always going to he welcome.
I'm all for future 1sts...I'm just personally doubtful someone is going to trade that far out for what would obviously be a short term Playoff run rental of Bruce/and more so a tax savings team. Generally those teams are ones facing a rebuild by the time 27-28' are rolling around.
I understand you said lottery protection but I just don't see a team that can see a rebuild on the horizon wanting to ever risk having a year where they've clearly taken a few steps back and be stuck having to give up their pick to further prolong it when they'd so obviously just tank the season and then it converts to 2nds which a couple of seconds in 29'+ really isn't all that impactful.
Which is again why I think a move like "Rui" where we get the slightly better & younger rotation piece as a result of taking on additional year(s) of salary OR it's to a rival tank team that wants to shed ok players like Cam Johnson, Jon Collins, Robert Williams, etc but then they're the teams wanting us to add some sort of pick, that hopefully we'd offer a collection of SRPs with instead BUT again I could see our FO willing to add the IND pick if they believe it's a good, solid younger-ish player that they'd expect to be a part of the next 3 or so years of growing. I think they continue to try to find guys in that 24-27ish age bracket that are gonna contribute pretty much asap. Again this not something I hope they do, it's just what I think the FO will do. I think they're trying to actively re-shape the roster, not put it further down the road.
GreatWhiteStiff wrote:You gotta put Brown higher in the my so called life Peking Order than Jakobe. He can go rot in the gleague or whatever.