Page 1 of 7

Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 3:54 pm
by WuTang_CMB
Read on Twitter



he moves

• The Raptors traded Bruce Brown, Olynyk, the Indiana Pacers’ 2026 top-four protected first-round pick and their own 2031 second-round pick to the New Orleans Pelicans for Ingram.

This trade fits seamlessly from a cap perspective. Ingram agreed to waive a trade bonus he was due, which would have been paid by the Pelicans but applied to his cap/tax hit for Toronto. Waiving the kicker saves the Raptors about $2.1 million in tax space, with the net of the deal adding about $200,000 to the Raptors’ books, which they had plenty of room for.

(Ingram had no need to waive the trade kicker, other than to start the relationship off on the right foot. It could suggest his side feels good about his next deal.)

Moving Olynyk also clears $13.4 million off the books for 2025-26. That money is something New Orleans would have priced in when determining the draft pick return here.

• Toronto then dealt Davion Mitchell to the Miami Heat for P.J. Tucker, the Los Angeles Lakers’ 2026 second-round pick and cash.

While the Raptors could get creative in structuring this deal to create a new trade exception, doing so would leave them with too little of their mid-level exception to sign a player to a long-term deal for the rest of the season (more on this shortly). I’m working under the assumption they did a straight swap, then, as while Tucker makes about $5 million more than Mitchell, the salary matching math works.

• Finally, the Raptors traded a 2026 top-55 protected second-round pick to the Pacers for James Wiseman and cash.

While Wiseman has an interesting contract and was (is?) an interesting prospect, he was not long for Toronto. Indiana was barely below the luxury tax, and getting out of Wiseman’s $2.2 million contract gives them more breathing room on the buyout market. Toronto, meanwhile, had the space to absorb him and will get cash for its troubles. The pick the Raptors are sending is a “fake second;” the league rules require you to send something in a trade, so here the Raptors send a pick that will never convey unless they get really good, really fast.

The Raptors have already waived Wiseman.

Here’s how things look right now:

Image



PROJECTED 25/26

Immanuel Quickley

$32,500,000

RJ Barrett

$27,705,357

Jakob Poeltl

$19,500,000

Scottie Barnes

$38,661,700

Gradey Dick

$4,900,560

Ochai Agbaji

$6,383,525

Ja’Kobe Walter

$3,638,160

Jonathan Mogbo

$1,955,377

Jamal Shead

$1,955,377

Jamison Battle

$1,955,377

TOTAL

$139,155,433







No. 5 overall pick

$9,069,852

NEW TOTAL

$148,255,285






CAP

$154,646,800

CAP SPACE

$3,875,779

TAX

$187,895,400

TAX SPACE

$39,670,115


Hey, congrats, you got a pretty good pick! You now only have about $39 million for Ingram and your final three roster spots. In the champagne problem category, landing Cooper Flagg would leave the Raptors just an estimated $34.9 million for Ingram and their final three spots.

There are a few ways you can continue to tweak and make this livable. A team-friendly deal for Ingram goes a long way. You could also just spend into the tax! There’s nothing prohibiting the Raptors from doing so, they’re a big-market team, and while they’ve only ever spent into the tax in 2018-19, you don’t have to be under the tax until the final day of the season. Theoretically, you could operate above the tax, see how things go, and then try to get under the tax in-season if things aren’t clicking; that’s tough from a leverage standpoint, but we see it every year.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:01 pm
by WuTang_CMB
Read on Twitter

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:03 pm
by WuTang_CMB
With $39M roughly they have to be creative. BI won't go for $40M and he isnt going to get that in the open market

Boucher's time with the Raps is pretty much done

Unless they move RJ/IQ for something cheaper, this is it

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:05 pm
by Godaddycurse
Ingram 36M starting
2 second round contracts <2M

operate as 14 man roster

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:05 pm
by LoveMyRaps
Read on Twitter

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:13 pm
by Raptors_128
So what I get from this is that they can’t afford to bring back Boucher unless RJ is traded.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:14 pm
by Godaddycurse
Raptors_128 wrote:So what I get from this is that they can’t afford to bring back Boucher unless RJ is traded.


or unless we go into the tax

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:19 pm
by douggood
Raptors_128 wrote:So what I get from this is that they can’t afford to bring back Boucher unless RJ is traded.

boucher is a gonner unless its min near min contract.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:19 pm
by ItsDanger
I brought up something similar in the Ingram trade thread but was told "so what". This cap situation has little flexibility and likely means bench is just young unproven players.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:21 pm
by douggood
ItsDanger wrote:I brought up something similar in the Ingram trade thread but was told "so what". This cap situation has little flexibility and likely means bench is just young unproven players.

its either Ingram at sf, RJ at sg and Dick on bench

or RJ at sf Dick at sg and MLE on bench

which would you rather have?

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:24 pm
by bonjovi0308
Rj is the odd man out

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:25 pm
by ItsDanger
douggood wrote:
ItsDanger wrote:I brought up something similar in the Ingram trade thread but was told "so what". This cap situation has little flexibility and likely means bench is just young unproven players.

its either Ingram at sf, RJ at sg and Dick on bench

or RJ at sf Dick at sg and MLE on bench

which would you rather have?

Neither, both lineups aren't adequate defensively at the wings.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:30 pm
by agkagk
We are 100% a tax team next year.

Our roster is set, we don’t need flexibility

Rj quick Ingram Scottie Jacob
Dick shead acbaji mogbo veteran stretch 4/5
Walter, battle, the 8th pick, more bench mob kids


There’s a clear road map for our cap and roster construction for the next 3 years in there somewhere.

We can always dip the repeater.

All in one year.

Incredible work here.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:38 pm
by Indeed
bonjovi0308 wrote:Rj is the odd man out


I really don't see the fit with Quickley who is more SG as well, not sure why people claim Barrett is the odd man out.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:40 pm
by Troubadour
agkagk wrote:We are 100% a tax team next year.

Our roster is set, we don’t need flexibility

Rj quick Ingram Scottie Jacob
Dick shead acbaji mogbo veteran stretch 4/5
Walter, battle, the 8th pick, more bench mob kids

All in one year.

Incredible work here.


Who's the veteran stretch 5 you're getting for the minimum?

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:42 pm
by billy_hoyle
No real issues here. We basically have a healthy offer/room available for BI.

Depending on how the draft goes we can go multiple ways.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:47 pm
by Spida888
It'll be interesting to see what we do with IQ/Barrett/Poeltl next year.

Barrett's been good so far despite his flaws but not sure on long term fit. IQ looks like he's overpaid but I'll give him some more time given he was mostly injured this season and Ingram should improve the spacing. Poeltl will be an expiring unless we extend him.

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:52 pm
by anotherhomer
If it starts at 33M for ingram, it be a 2+1

If it's 36M will likely be for 3 years no opt out

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:52 pm
by YogurtProducer
Indeed wrote:
bonjovi0308 wrote:Rj is the odd man out


I really don't see the fit with Quickley who is more SG as well, not sure why people claim Barrett is the odd man out.

In what world is IQ a SG?

Re: Blake Murphy: Cap Moving Forward

Posted: Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:56 pm
by Wise80
I think our bench should be fine with the young guys.

Shead looks like he'll be fine for consistent bench minutes next year. You have Ochai who will probably be subbed in early for Scottie or RJ. Then you'll have a high pick that should theoretically be able to provide 20+ minutes. Hopefully he's a big.

Then there is Dick and Walter. If one of them makes a leap, then you have your 9. Having one of those guys as your 10th man isn't that bad. It's a decent bench for a team that is tweaking there lineup and is at the start of there refresh. I think that's an ok bench for a team that is hoping to get into the playoffs next year. They're young and will grow.

Give them 2 years and Masai 2 years to add and tinker with the starters and we'll look a lot better.