First it was the Cleveland game where he snapped on reporter who asked why he took out Bargnani a few minutes in to the game which was a good and reasonable question...
Then he snapped yesterday again saying "why yall always mention the negatives, yeh we rebounded bad but gimme some positives?"
He needs to cool down I never see him with a smile on his face or happy after a nice win not even last year when we were doiing great in January or February.
Why does Sam Mitchell always snap on the media?
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
Why does Sam Mitchell always snap on the media?
-
Test of Wills
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,590
- And1: 6
- Joined: Aug 05, 2006
- Location: CN Tower City
-
msklifesux__
- Freshman
- Posts: 59
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 29, 2007
-
Hank_Scorpio
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,179
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jun 04, 2001
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
That's who he is. He plays with the media. Not sure what his precise reason is, but my guess is that he does it to take pressure of his players - if everyone is talking about what crazy ole Sam had to say, then people are less likely to focus on the players' comments.
Postbro1 wrote:Obama is right on this.
-
HighOctane
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 363
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
-
-
bill russell
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 846
- And1: 65
- Joined: Oct 31, 2007
It's a hard job. Imagine yourself having to sit at the end of each work day and get scrutinized and second guessed for all the world to see. Doesn't matter how much you make, or how long you've been doing it -- it's hard and it's impossible not to take it personally because it's your judgment and ability they're questioning.
Also, all due respect to the reporters, they don't know the game anywhere near as well as the coaches do, and a lot of their questions do seem stupid to the coaches.
That said, I think good coaches (especially good coaches who are good people) learn patience. They also learn that they look better when they dutifully and politely answer questions rather than looking quick tempered or thin skinner.
Also, all due respect to the reporters, they don't know the game anywhere near as well as the coaches do, and a lot of their questions do seem stupid to the coaches.
That said, I think good coaches (especially good coaches who are good people) learn patience. They also learn that they look better when they dutifully and politely answer questions rather than looking quick tempered or thin skinner.
-
C Court
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,485
- And1: 26,388
- Joined: Nov 07, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Kurtz wrote:He made a good point yesterday. We won a game rather easily, yet all of the reporters were focusing only on the negative, rebounding.
Much like the post game thread
I heard the interview with Sam and I said "damn, the same thing's happening in the post game thread".
On the other hand, I'd be a little testy if I had to answer the same dumb questions over and over and over again. Really, if you listen to most of the questions after a game, they are quite predictable.
NBA Champion Toronto Raptors
-
LittleOzzy
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 35,033
- And1: 4,198
- Joined: Dec 19, 2005
-
Centre Court wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I heard the interview with Sam and I said "damn, the same thing's happening in the post game thread".
On the other hand, I'd be a little testy if I had to answer the same dumb questions over and over and over again. Really, if you listen to most of the questions after a game, they are quite predictable.
I can't believe you even attempt to read the post game threads.
-
Boogie!
- RealGM
- Posts: 65,302
- And1: 55,484
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
- Contact:
-
it's weird how people accept it because "it's him". it comes off as pretty arrogant if you ask me. sometimes it looks stupid. for example the time someone asked about calderon and mitchell went on a rant about that's why they didn't trade him like the reporters said they should (which they didn't) then he brought up moon and said we that's why we kept moon. then a reporter said something like, "but no one said to trade calderon" to which mitchell replied, "but we're not talking about calderon right now, we're talking about moon." the smartass thing really makes him look ignorant.
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.
-
Dennis 37
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,686
- And1: 18,424
- Joined: Feb 24, 2007
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
It would be a great reality show.
Canada's Next Top NBA Coach.
Judges: The Smitch, Charles Oakley and Jalen Rose
Each week contestants attend a Raptor game. The game tape would be edited showing both the good and bad decisions made by the Smitch. In "house" discussions would revolve around those decisions and pro-Smitch and anti-Smitch contestant cliques would be encouraged, by the producers, to argue Raptor strategy.
The Challenges would include:
Given a hypothetical illogical new lineup, try to justify the change in terms of the often stated premise that floor time is earned, not given.
Imitate the hands on the forehead lost look after your team has blown a ten point lead.
Perform a morning Radio interview where you do your best to, in a humourous manner, make the hosts sound like idiots.
Act as a post game media hack trying to ask a question where the Smitch doesn't rip you to pieces.
And the final challenge, tape of actual post game questions will be played where contestants try to mimic the Smitch's contempt for stupidity.
Canada's Next Top NBA Coach.
Judges: The Smitch, Charles Oakley and Jalen Rose
Each week contestants attend a Raptor game. The game tape would be edited showing both the good and bad decisions made by the Smitch. In "house" discussions would revolve around those decisions and pro-Smitch and anti-Smitch contestant cliques would be encouraged, by the producers, to argue Raptor strategy.
The Challenges would include:
Given a hypothetical illogical new lineup, try to justify the change in terms of the often stated premise that floor time is earned, not given.
Imitate the hands on the forehead lost look after your team has blown a ten point lead.
Perform a morning Radio interview where you do your best to, in a humourous manner, make the hosts sound like idiots.
Act as a post game media hack trying to ask a question where the Smitch doesn't rip you to pieces.
And the final challenge, tape of actual post game questions will be played where contestants try to mimic the Smitch's contempt for stupidity.
Re: Why does Sam Mitchell always snap on the media?
-
gcsw
- Starter
- Posts: 2,256
- And1: 74
- Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Re: Why does Sam Mitchell always snap on the media?
Essa_21 wrote:First it was the Cleveland game where he snapped on reporter who asked why he took out Bargnani a few minutes in to the game which was a good and reasonable question...
Then he snapped yesterday again saying "why yall always mention the negatives, yeh we rebounded bad but gimme some positives?"
He needs to cool down I never see him with a smile on his face or happy after a nice win not even last year when we were doiing great in January or February.
Sam is arrogant and classless. And when you take into consideration that he is among the worst coach in NBA history, it becomes pretty pathetic that he is acting like that.
Whats wrong with pointing out their rebounding issues? You would think he would do like other good coaches who say "despite winning, i'm not satisfied with the way we played. We played poorly, etc. We need to play better" BUT NO, Sam has to act like an idiot and use the excuse that they won(against bad teams of course) and forget about rebounding. That is yet another reason why they are not improving at all.