enough is enough, time to give up on Bargnani as future C
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
enough is enough, time to give up on Bargnani as future C
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 759
- And1: 554
- Joined: Apr 01, 2007
enough is enough, time to give up on Bargnani as future C
I mean I think it's become quite clear that Bargnani can't be the center of the future alongside Bosh everyone(including myself) was hoping for. He honestly probably is the worse rebounder I have ever seen. Sorry but no up and coming franchise, hoping to one day contend for titles, could survive with this guy playing center everynight(especially on a team that is relatively soft and bad at rebounding to begin with) . Unfortunately I've even seen stats that prove Bargnani may be the worse rebounder of all-time! (ouch)
And no, this isn't a trade Bargnani thread, giving up on him now would be stupid, a huge waste, and get us little in return. It's time we realistically consider moving him to the 3. I know, i know, we've heard and talked about this before, how Bargnani is too slow and awkward, and how he would have trouble keeping up with opposing 3's. However, putting Bargnani at SF would allow him to park out at the 3pt line (where he's most comfortable) without having to worry about rebounding and other aspects of "being a center". Plus, you could always play a 2-3 zone (add another talented piece at the 5, who is really a 5) with potentially three 7 footers as your frontcourt, sound alot more imposing?
If you have read up to this point you may want to stop now! that is if you
And no, this isn't a trade Bargnani thread, giving up on him now would be stupid, a huge waste, and get us little in return. It's time we realistically consider moving him to the 3. I know, i know, we've heard and talked about this before, how Bargnani is too slow and awkward, and how he would have trouble keeping up with opposing 3's. However, putting Bargnani at SF would allow him to park out at the 3pt line (where he's most comfortable) without having to worry about rebounding and other aspects of "being a center". Plus, you could always play a 2-3 zone (add another talented piece at the 5, who is really a 5) with potentially three 7 footers as your frontcourt, sound alot more imposing?
If you have read up to this point you may want to stop now! that is if you
- Yuri Vaultin
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,168
- And1: 14,506
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: In a tree by your window.
-
- itbobby007
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 5,956
- And1: 2,859
- Joined: Oct 28, 2005
- Location: Hazelton
-
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 488
- And1: 5
- Joined: Nov 08, 2007
TJ11 wrote:No way in hell Jose fetches us a top 5 pick.
it could happen. Jose is one the best PG's in the league. Teams like Atlanta would do it straight up. It's a gamble I would take on a good center. Don't foget Grizzlies traded Shareef Abdur Rahim for a top 5 pick and they landed future franchise player Pau Gasol.

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,916
- And1: 33,776
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
itbobby007 wrote:Why is it that the draft always holds the answer to everything....
It resets the 5 year clock.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
- dacrusha
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,696
- And1: 5,418
- Joined: Dec 11, 2003
- Location: Waiting for Jesse Ventura to show up...
-
nooooo
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 759
- And1: 554
- Joined: Apr 01, 2007
nooooo
I agree that Bargs is not our future Center but I disagree that he should move to the 3. I think he is best when he comes off the bench.
sure that sounds convenient......but 1# overall pick for a scoring PF off the bench who can't rebound, defend, or play big? I DON'T THINK SO!
- Darrick Martin
- Starter
- Posts: 2,027
- And1: 3
- Joined: Dec 20, 2006
- Location: Capital One.. what's in your wallet?
- Contact:
CreaM wrote:I agree that Bargs is not our future Center but I disagree that he should move to the 3. I think he is best when he comes off the bench.
werd.. backup to Bosh in conjunction with a big rebounding C
“On paper, in terms of just pure talent, I would say, yes, this is the best team we’ve had,” - Bryan Colangelo (Sep 29, 2008)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,647
- And1: 605
- Joined: Feb 17, 2005
Can we afford to trade Jose considering how often TJ is injured? What happens if TJ has another scare and decides that it is not worth coming back next time?
Consider TJ's injury history the past 12 months. What happens if we trade Calderon and he goes down again in the playoffs?
IMO before this latest injury trading Calderon seemed inevitable. His performance as a starter and TJ's recurring stingers give me second thoughts.
Consider TJ's injury history the past 12 months. What happens if we trade Calderon and he goes down again in the playoffs?
IMO before this latest injury trading Calderon seemed inevitable. His performance as a starter and TJ's recurring stingers give me second thoughts.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,696
- And1: 116
- Joined: Nov 16, 2007
It's not that the raps should give up on him, they should give up on him as being the go to scorer type (Right now). Before Dirk became "The Man" he played third fiddle to Nash and Finley. Two great vets who took him under their wing and showed him how to take over a game. Bargs doesn't have that yet... I think toronto needs to find a decent perimeter scorer who can teach Bargs and consistently make space for Bosh.
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,344
- And1: 45
- Joined: Feb 15, 2005
- Location: Above .500
Re: nooooo
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 778
- And1: 453
- Joined: Jul 29, 2006
Re: nooooo
nivisi9 wrote:sure that sounds convenient......but 1# overall pick for a scoring PF off the bench who can't rebound, defend, or play big? I DON'T THINK SO!
Aren't you giving up on Andrea a bit too soon ? its been a season and a half.
When you say play big what do you mean ? do you even know what you're trying to say. Andrea is a decent defender from point of view and I believe he's a damn good job of holding his own considering his injuries and inconsistency of Sam mitchell.
I disagree with everything you've said in this thread from putting him to the 3 and not having to worry about rebounding ? how about the total rebounding woes of the team ?
I think putting him at the 3 would be the worst thing Sam mitchell could do at this point !!!
- Hank_Scorpio
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,179
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jun 04, 2001
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,916
- And1: 33,776
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
MJallday59 wrote:It's not that the raps should give up on him, they should give up on him as being the go to scorer type (Right now). Before Dirk became "The Man" he played third fiddle to Nash and Finley. Two great vets who took him under their wing and showed him how to take over a game. Bargs doesn't have that yet... I think toronto needs to find a decent perimeter scorer who can teach Bargs and consistently make space for Bosh.
I don't think that's an accurate recounting of the history of the Mavs.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.