ImageImageImageImageImage

Smith's Sunday Mailbag

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

User avatar
supersub15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,846
And1: 27
Joined: Dec 16, 2003
Location: God, family, Raps and Man U

Smith's Sunday Mailbag 

Post#1 » by supersub15 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:24 pm

read more here

Here's an excerpt:
Q: This is not your typical "get Sam Dalembert" demand to BC... consider it an honest question. Why don't you think he would be a good fit here? He averages a double-double and protects the basket (2.5 blocks). And at 73% from the line he is not a Ben Wallace liability at the end of games. Is it because of his salary? ($10 mill IS quite a bit). Or is it a lack of potential?
Ed C, Toronto

A: Money has almost everything to do with it, he
bballin
Banned User
Posts: 62
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 19, 2008

 

Post#2 » by bballin » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:38 pm

I agree with Doug and I feel the same way about players like Rudy gay who many raptor fans seem to think would be instant success in Toronto and drool over his stats while trashing Bargnani every chance they get, Rudy Gay is -88 over his last six games. Thes types of players never seem to be on winning toeams or make teammates better or are around when it matters most.
The Journey Man
Junior
Posts: 355
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 25, 2006

Re: Smith's Sunday Mailbag 

Post#3 » by The Journey Man » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:44 pm

supersub15 wrote:read more here

Here's an excerpt:
Q: This is not your typical "get Sam Dalembert" demand to BC... consider it an honest question. Why don't you think he would be a good fit here? He averages a double-double and protects the basket (2.5 blocks). And at 73% from the line he is not a Ben Wallace liability at the end of games. Is it because of his salary? ($10 mill IS quite a bit). Or is it a lack of potential?
Ed C, Toronto

A: Money has almost everything to do with it, he
Basketball_Jones
RealGM
Posts: 30,510
And1: 17,834
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
     

 

Post#4 » by Basketball_Jones » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:54 pm

bballin wrote:I agree with Doug and I feel the same way about players like Rudy gay who many raptor fans seem to think would be instant success in Toronto and drool over his stats while trashing Bargnani every chance they get, Rudy Gay is -88 over his last six games. Thes types of players never seem to be on winning toeams or make teammates better or are around when it matters most.


Gay is better, and would be a better fit on this team than Bargnani. Of course fans will bring his name up and trash Bargnani. Unless Bargs shows some drastic improvement over the next 1.5 years, it will continue to happen. Until then we all just have to deal with it.
User avatar
mangos
Starter
Posts: 2,272
And1: 9
Joined: Apr 06, 2004
Location: Toronto

 

Post#5 » by mangos » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:57 pm

what's this about a black third jersey? is that confirmed?

Edit: NM, just saw Doug's last post. I hope they keep "Toronto" on the front.

A new look coming

A year or so, a wise old sage suggested these guys should have a third jersey, that should be black
User avatar
Test of Wills
Analyst
Posts: 3,590
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 05, 2006
Location: CN Tower City

 

Post#6 » by Test of Wills » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:00 am

mangos wrote:what's this about a black third jersey? is that confirmed?

Edit: NM, just saw Doug's last post. I hope they keep "Toronto" on the front.

A new look coming

A year or so, a wise old sage suggested these guys should have a third jersey, that should be black
bballin
Banned User
Posts: 62
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 19, 2008

 

Post#7 » by bballin » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:12 am

Basketball_Jones wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Gay is better, and would be a better fit on this team than Bargnani. Of course fans will bring his name up and trash Bargnani. Unless Bargs shows some drastic improvement over the next 1.5 years, it will continue to happen. Until then we all just have to deal with it.


I disagree Gay is merely an average player on a bad team who has failed to make the Grizzlies better while having a decent starting five on paper. If you put bargnani on a losing team he to would be putting up points being given the green light to develop at all costs. We also would of never aquired Moon if we had drafted Gay who in my opinion is a better defender, a better rebounder, a better blocker, better at steals and is pretty much equal in my mind at scoring the ball (inconsistent J). Gay has done nothing in this league but lose, his rookie season was not as good as bargnani's, and this year while he is scoring more his defense and other aspects of his game has regressed. As I said above over his last six games he is an embarrassing -88 yet some fans continue to droll on him, if bargnani ever had -88 over a six game stretch even I would be asking for his head.

Guys like these are a dime a dozen, they make a big block or a big dunk and on the very next play they make a dumb turn over, make a lazy half effort pass, caught out of position, let there man blow by them, fail to make teammates better and never are there when the game is on the line not only to keep their team in it but lift them to victory.

Its amazing to me how a fan watches Dalembert and he makes say five freakish blocks during a game and afterwards they say "wow what a stud, he would be great here". Mean while they totally ignore the other 50 posessions where he was abused and scored on at will while making poor decisions on the other end as well which often result in his teams loss.

Neither of these guys are a difference maker in the outcome of games and there is many more like them in the NBA.
Joker
RealGM
Posts: 17,846
And1: 7,276
Joined: Feb 05, 2003

 

Post#8 » by Joker » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:15 am

bballin wrote:I agree with Doug and I feel the same way about players like Rudy gay who many raptor fans seem to think would be instant success in Toronto and drool over his stats while trashing Bargnani every chance they get, Rudy Gay is -88 over his last six games. Thes types of players never seem to be on winning toeams or make teammates better or are around when it matters most.


Of course, nobody felt this way about Bosh while he was putting up great numbers when we were terrible.
Vik Rude
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,968
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 08, 2005
Location: Brampton & Montreal
Contact:

 

Post#9 » by Vik Rude » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:24 am

Doug's right on this one. Just because a player is doing good on a bad team doesn't mean he will do good on a decent or good team. A perfect example of this is Mike James when he was with the Raptors.
Image
User avatar
alivinglegend
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,335
And1: 276
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

 

Post#10 » by alivinglegend » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:24 am

Joker wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Of course, nobody felt this way about Bosh while he was putting up great numbers when we were terrible.


Bosh never played with anyone on the level of Gasol or Mike Miller though
Jamario Moon Trancends Time And Space
Joker
RealGM
Posts: 17,846
And1: 7,276
Joined: Feb 05, 2003

 

Post#11 » by Joker » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:26 am

How would Dalembert become worse by playing for us? Would he block fewer shots because we're a better team than Philly? what's the logic behind that?
User avatar
elephunk
Head Coach
Posts: 6,181
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Location: "Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. Media." - Noam Chomsky
Contact:

 

Post#12 » by elephunk » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:26 am

alivinglegend wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Bosh never played with anyone on the level of Gasol or Mike Miller though


Vince Carter? Jalen Rose?
Bosh never played in the Western Conference either.

Btw, you don't have to be as good as Bosh to make an impact on this team.
Obama did not shut down the practice of torture, but merely repositioned it, to the American norm. The torture regime of Ford through Clinton, year by year, produced more US-backed strapped-down agony than was produced during the Bush/Cheney years.
LINK
User avatar
alivinglegend
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,335
And1: 276
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

 

Post#13 » by alivinglegend » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:28 am

elephunk wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Vince Carter? Jalen Rose? AD?

Bosh never played in the Western Conference either.


He played with AD for what 20 games, a full effort VC for 70? maybe? Jalen Rose for a season (which the team WAS actually going to make the playoffs until Jalen broke his hand causing the team to miss it again)
Jamario Moon Trancends Time And Space
User avatar
ponder276
Head Coach
Posts: 6,075
And1: 67
Joined: Oct 14, 2007

 

Post#14 » by ponder276 » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:29 am

bballin wrote:Its amazing to me how a fan watches Dalembert and he makes say five freakish blocks during a game and afterwards they say "wow what a stud, he would be great here". Mean while they totally ignore the other 50 posessions where he was abused and scored on at will while making poor decisions on the other end as well which often result in his teams loss.

Neither of these guys are a difference maker in the outcome of games and there is many more like them in the NBA.


If you wanna talk about +/-, Dalembert leads the Sixers in +/-
http://www.nba.com/statistics/lenovo/le ... team=76ers

He certainly has some issues, but I overall see him as a very good fit for this team. If he can be brought in for cheap, I'd do it in a second. He is on a long and not great contract - the Sixers dumped Korver because of his contract, maybe over the summer we can do something like Rasho (large, expiring contract) + Hump (cheap, decent big) for Dalembert, I'd do it in a second. If we had to throw in a 1st, I'd probably still do it, but I'd have to think about it. A deal like that combined with a young wing player for Bargs + maybe AP's expiring makes us a good team now, with the potential to be true contenders.
Basketball_Jones
RealGM
Posts: 30,510
And1: 17,834
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
     

 

Post#15 » by Basketball_Jones » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:32 am

[quote="bballin"][/quote]

So what exactly are you disagreeing about? You don't think Rudy Gay is better than Bargnani? Wow. Let's just look at one of your points: Rudy Gay is given the green light to develop on a crappy team. Valid point, but how does that make him less of a player than Bargnani? You are basically saying Bargs would put up similar numbers in that type of environment, but he isn't given that opportunity. So does this make him equal to Rudy Gay or better? Because logic dictates that Bargnani doesn't have those opportunities, so he isn't as good as Rudy Gay.

As far as Gay not elevating his team, well Memphis kind of sucks in terms of overall talent. One guy can't do it all, despite one you claim to be a decent starting five. Put Bargnani on that team and they wouldn't be any better either, perhaps even worse. As far as a -88, I will assume that refers to efficiency. Rather than looking at a 6 game stretch, why not logically look at his overall seasonal +17, higher than Jamario Moons(12) and Bargnani's (6). As far as Jamario being equal to Rudy Gay offensively, you are just reaching for straws here and I won't even go further with this ridiculous point.
bballin
Banned User
Posts: 62
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 19, 2008

 

Post#16 » by bballin » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:40 am

ponder276 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



If you wanna talk about +/-, Dalembert leads the Sixers in +/-
http://www.nba.com/statistics/lenovo/le ... team=76ers

He certainly has some issues, but I overall see him as a very good fit for this team. If he can be brought in for cheap, I'd do it in a second. He is on a long and not great contract - the Sixers dumped Korver because of his contract, maybe over the summer we can do something like Rasho (large, expiring contract) + Hump (cheap, decent big) for Dalembert, I'd do it in a second. If we had to throw in a 1st, I'd probably still do it, but I'd have to think about it. A deal like that combined with a young wing player for Bargs + maybe AP's expiring makes us a good team now, with the potential to be true contenders.


We are already a good team, we just finished off a 47 win season and are currently seeded 5th in the eastern conference while playing one of the hardest NBA schedules to date to go along with several injuries this season, TJ, Bargnani, Bosh, Garbo.

Its amazing how we went from laughing stock in the league, fans wearing paper bags over their heads to in one years time demanding championship. Anyways Dalembert doesnt make us a title contender now or in the future and with that contract thats a major no no. He is good for some rebounds and a couple nasty dunks a game but he is also a poor offensive player and a player that ofen can be seen having several serious mental lapese throughout a game.

A player with the potential to be the great but seems to not want it bad enough to go along with some serious iq issues and not understanding the finer points of the game. You dont pay a guy 60 million on potential, it would be a disaster in the sense that we would truly become a treadmill team incapable of making moves because of big contracts like his.
User avatar
Kurtz
RealGM
Posts: 15,556
And1: 16,471
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Toronto

 

Post#17 » by Kurtz » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:40 am

Basketball_Jones wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


As far as Gay not elevating his team, well Memphis kind of sucks in terms of overall talent. One guy can't do it all, despite one you claim to be a decent starting five. Put Bargnani on that team and they wouldn't be any better either, perhaps even worse. As far as a -88, I will assume that refers to efficiency. Rather than looking at a 6 game stretch, why not logically look at his overall seasonal +17, higher than Jamario Moons(12) and Bargnani's (6). As far as Jamario being equal to Rudy Gay offensively, you are just reaching for straws here and I won't even go further with this ridiculous point.


Thing with Gay, and I wrote about it about a week ago, is he's kind of a black hole in offense. He takes 16 shots per game, which is more than their most effective scorers in Miller and Gasol.

Now, this surely isn't a big enough sample size, but in the 1 game Gay missed this season, Memphis was able to get Miller/Navarro/Gasol much more involved, and get the ball moving, and Memphis put up 102 points in 3 quarters.

Since Gay doesn't really contribute defensively, I do have to wonder if Memphis, who on paper should at least be competitive, would not have been actually better without him this season.
User avatar
ansoncarter
Head Coach
Posts: 6,152
And1: 367
Joined: Feb 01, 2006

 

Post#18 » by ansoncarter » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:48 am

Joker wrote:How would Dalembert become worse by playing for us? Would he block fewer shots because we're a better team than Philly? what's the logic behind that?


there isn't any logic to it

smith is such a company man now. He's starting to sound like chuck swirsky
User avatar
elephunk
Head Coach
Posts: 6,181
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Location: "Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. Media." - Noam Chomsky
Contact:

 

Post#19 » by elephunk » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:51 am

Kurtz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Thing with Gay, and I wrote about it about a week ago, is he's kind of a black hole in offense. He takes 16 shots per game, which is more than their most effective scorers in Miller and Gasol.

Now, this surely isn't a big enough sample size, but in the 1 game Gay missed this season, Memphis was able to get Miller/Navarro/Gasol much more involved, and get the ball moving, and Memphis put up 102 points in 3 quarters.

Since Gay doesn't really contribute defensively, I do have to wonder if Memphis, who on paper should at least be competitive, would not have been actually better without him this season.


He doesn't contribute defensively? 5.8 RPG, 1.5 SPG, 0.9 BPG.


I agree with you re:him taking a lot of shots. He takes about 1-2 shots more than required for my liking. If he were to play for our team, since we have Bosh, that wouldn't even be a problem.
Obama did not shut down the practice of torture, but merely repositioned it, to the American norm. The torture regime of Ford through Clinton, year by year, produced more US-backed strapped-down agony than was produced during the Bush/Cheney years.
LINK
Mr. Perfect
Analyst
Posts: 3,437
And1: 1,639
Joined: Mar 27, 2007
 

 

Post#20 » by Mr. Perfect » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:53 am

Kurtz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Thing with Gay, and I wrote about it about a week ago, is he's kind of a black hole in offense. He takes 16 shots per game, which is more than their most effective scorers in Miller and Gasol.

Now, this surely isn't a big enough sample size, but in the 1 game Gay missed this season, Memphis was able to get Miller/Navarro/Gasol much more involved, and get the ball moving, and Memphis put up 102 points in 3 quarters.

Since Gay doesn't really contribute defensively, I do have to wonder if Memphis, who on paper should at least be competitive, would not have been actually better without him this season.


It's an anomaly. Gay is pretty efficient at 46% (It was higher before his recent slump) so it's not like he's scoring simply off of volume. The Lakers started off last year 3-0 without Kobe, and the Cavs also had a pretty decent record alst year without Lebron. A few games here and there are just too small of a sample to really judge.

Also, that game where the Grizzlies went off without Gay was against the Sonics. Hardly a good team.

Return to Toronto Raptors


cron