ImageImageImageImageImage

Bob McCowan: "I'd do Kaman for Bargnani"

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

User avatar
Test of Wills
Analyst
Posts: 3,590
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 05, 2006
Location: CN Tower City

Bob McCowan: "I'd do Kaman for Bargnani" 

Post#1 » by Test of Wills » Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:58 pm

Doug Smith was on the Fan590 with McCowan and Stephen Brunt and they were surprisingly discussing about the Toronto Raptors,Bargs and the upcoming trade deadline. Smith talked about how BC is in the trade market looking for a "about 6'9 bruising, rebounding SF who could guard the Pierce's and the James's" while this Douchebag Bobcat randomly suggests that BC should trade Bargs for Kaman. Like who wouldn't at the moment but do you really think the Clipps will accept that offer at this time. Smith responds with saying how Kaman has been given 4 years to develop in this league and has been producing this year and why people like McCowan wont give Bargs 4 years too. Well it was a funny convo anyone know if they could post it?
User avatar
xAIRNESSx
RealGM
Posts: 18,612
And1: 13,985
Joined: Jan 06, 2005
       

 

Post#2 » by xAIRNESSx » Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:59 pm

No one was saying to trade for Kaman last year when he was playing like ****. I wonder why.
Image
CJ_18
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,088
And1: 35
Joined: Jun 27, 2006

 

Post#3 » by CJ_18 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:02 am

xAIRNESSx wrote:No one was saying to trade for Kaman last year when he was playing like ****. I wonder why.


That's why we shouldn't trade Bargs.





______________
RIP Sean Taylor
User avatar
Turnpikebandit
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,998
And1: 300
Joined: Jul 30, 2002

 

Post#4 » by Turnpikebandit » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:03 am

It's kind of an interesting suggestion in terms of balancing the frountcourts of both respective teams. But it's clearly not going to happen, which is probably why Bobcat suggested it.
J Dilla
Banned User
Posts: 19,605
And1: 1,832
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
Location: Deeznuts

 

Post#5 » by J Dilla » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:03 am

Maybe Okafor for Bargnani can work. I don't see Clips dealin Kaman.
teamLeiweke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,837
And1: 5,019
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

 

Post#6 » by teamLeiweke » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:04 am

Its so contradicting for me, I get frustrated either way, Bobcat cant win in regards to basketball....

When Bobcat talks basketball I want to tell him to sharrrrup, cause he knows nothing.. and frustrates me. BUT, when I turn on the tv or radio and all they talk about is hockey, or anything else remotely close to a sport not named basketball.. I get mad and want to shoot myself cause they ignore discussion about my favourite sport.
User avatar
That Other Guy
Veteran
Posts: 2,816
And1: 95
Joined: Sep 05, 2007
 

 

Post#7 » by That Other Guy » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:05 am

Now why on earth would Bargs tell McCowan to do Kaman?
YogiStewart
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,988
And1: 6,469
Joined: Aug 08, 2007
Location: Its ALL about Location, Location, Location!

 

Post#8 » by YogiStewart » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:05 am

Bob McCowan is one of the most entertaining sports broadcasters out there.
I really like his hockey commentary.
but basketball....not sure what he knows and how he knows, but its quite apparent to me that he really doesn't know.
teamLeiweke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,837
And1: 5,019
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

 

Post#9 » by teamLeiweke » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:08 am

YogiStewart wrote:Bob McCowan is one of the most entertaining sports broadcasters out there.
I really like his hockey commentary.
but basketball....not sure what he knows and how he knows, but its quite apparent to me that he really doesn't know.


Agreed.
User avatar
ImissBobCostas
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,617
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 28, 2006

 

Post#10 » by ImissBobCostas » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:09 am

Raptor-holic wrote:Now why on earth would Bargs tell McCowan to do Kaman?


lol.
User avatar
sarah42
Starter
Posts: 2,094
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 10, 2007
Location: In bed with Jake Ryan. woot woot!

 

Post#11 » by sarah42 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:13 am

he wants a defensive player - like a ron artest i guess?

when are we getting a slashing sg or sf? hopefully in the next decade!
Image
inmate347 wrote:
BTW, I still maintain that the 1984 Denver Broncos are Lebron's father
Mr Swagtastic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,964
And1: 3,423
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Jurassic Park
         

 

Post#12 » by Mr Swagtastic » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:27 am

I would trade Bargnani for Kaman now. Look at what Kaman is doing in LA. He and Maggette are there team.

I doubt you would get LA to send you Kaman for Bargnani
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
emfive
General Manager
Posts: 9,746
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: Lake Wilcox

 

Post#13 » by emfive » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:36 am

xbl_sucks wrote:I would trade Bargnani for Kaman now. Look at what Kaman is doing in LA. He and Maggette are there team.

I doubt you would get LA to send you Kaman for Bargnani


Yeah cuz the last game he was so ... never mind! 8)
bling_singh
General Manager
Posts: 7,790
And1: 13
Joined: Aug 09, 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
       

 

Post#14 » by bling_singh » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:40 am

Bobcat would do Kaman, for Bargnani?
Mr Swagtastic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,964
And1: 3,423
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Jurassic Park
         

 

Post#15 » by Mr Swagtastic » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:40 am

emfive wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Yeah cuz the last game he was so ... never mind! 8)


Thats real hard to do agenst the worst NBA team. Talk to me when he does that agenst the best of the best

How many 20-20 games has Bargnani had? 0! Kaman has like 3 of them alone. The guy is a great rebounder and aside from Howard would be the best C in the East.

I love Bargnani's game don't get me wrong. I am one of those who would love to keep him but as it is now Kaman>>Bargnani.
gcsw
Starter
Posts: 2,256
And1: 74
Joined: Jul 03, 2006

 

Post#16 » by gcsw » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:41 am

Kaman was not a #1 pick. He deserves to have time to develop. When you take a player at number 1, he is not a project.
ldnk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,905
And1: 3,522
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

 

Post#17 » by ldnk » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:47 am

Holy hell:

Chris Kaman - 25 years old Drafted 2003
16.7 PPG 13.6 RPG 2.0 APG

Andrea Bargnani - 22 years old Drafted 2006
10.1 PPG 3.7 RPG 1.1 APG

Of course I do that deal....if Andrea was in his 5th season and was the same age as Kaman.

Career numbers:

Chris Kaman 10.2 PPG 8.2 RPG 1.2 APG
Andrea Bargnani 11.0 PPG 3.8 RPG 0.9 APG

Kaman is having one hell of a year on the glass but Bargnani is younger, came into the league as a project player and Bargnani's career numbers (rebounding aside) are pretty much identical despite only just recently starting to turn his game back around after a very troubled first half.
User avatar
Hank_Scorpio
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,179
And1: 6
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA

 

Post#18 » by Hank_Scorpio » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:49 am

gcsw wrote:Kaman was not a #1 pick. He deserves to have time to develop. When you take a player at number 1, he is not a project.


So if I have you correctly, if Bargnani had come out this year and we had picked him #3, then you would be comfortable giving him time to develop - but because he was drafted LAST year, you won't do that.

Right?

Same player, yet in one case you would give him a few years, while in the other case you want results right away?
Postbro1 wrote:Obama is right on this.
User avatar
Vlade Divac
Head Coach
Posts: 6,807
And1: 7,602
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Location: North York
       

 

Post#19 » by Vlade Divac » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:27 am

I'd do this trade in a second! But Clippers are not that dumb.
Image
AllKnowingNBAer
Banned User
Posts: 1,528
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

 

Post#20 » by AllKnowingNBAer » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:47 am

Throughout their careers...

Kaman will always be a better Centre
Bargnani will always be a more talented player overall

Personally, I would do a Bargnani for Kaman trade, since it is almost impossible to acquire a true centre nowadays, but the Clippers would never do it.

Return to Toronto Raptors