Those are the final results after 48 hours of voting. My pesonal thoughts,
I think Sam is a bit low. Considering the weaknessses he has, poor rotations, poor play-making, poor use of talent, early playoff exits, and yet seeing he won Coach of the Year in 2007 over many greats, and led this team the playoffs two years in a row including having the best record in franchise history. I would think his ratings should be around 44-45%...really mediocre at best!
BC is waaaaaay too low. But i think it correctly identifies the dispute that fans been having all years. He been a great GM and turned around this franchise pretty fast. He build a strong Suns team that also had a strong turnaround. I agree that having JO and CB4 combo is offensivly a very risky duo, but offensive it can have alot of potetntial and not too mention that this is a low risk high reward experiment in the first place...we lose his giant contract this year or the next i believe.
anyway here are the results...
Approved
Sam: 29%
BC: 56%
Disapproved
Sam: 52%
BC: 26%
Uncertain
Sam: 18%
BC: 17%
Voters
Sam: 124
BC: 153
Turnout (% of rollcall of 800)
Sam: 15.5%
BC: 19.1%
I didnt really have any motive in this polls except for seeing how cool it would be to actually have a statistical quanitiative information about how fans really see their undemocracticlly elected team coach and GM. I been think of making a poll like this every month...
RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100
RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
- rewill17
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,926
- And1: 271
- Joined: May 29, 2007
- Location: Pickering
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,871
- And1: 9,934
- Joined: Feb 02, 2007
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
If you would have waited two days the results would have been much different after a win.
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
- dTox
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,343
- And1: 15,665
- Joined: Jan 26, 2007
- Location: Basement
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
rewill17 wrote: I agree that having JO and CB4 combo is defensivily a very weak duo, but offensive it can have alot of potetntial and not too mention that this is a low risk high reward experiment in the first place...we lose his giant contract this year or the next i believe.
.
you my friends need to actually watch the game rather than make random polls, having JO with bosh puts us up as one of the elite big men defenders, offensively we are not there yet, but that does not take anything away from our defence
TBZ for the win
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
- garbage time
- Starter
- Posts: 2,364
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 27, 2008
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
rewill17 wrote: I agree that having JO and CB4 combo is defensivily a very weak duo, but offensive it can have alot of potetntial
what the hell
ibtl
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 79
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 07, 2008
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
rewill17 wrote: I agree that having JO and CB4 combo is defensivily a very weak duo, but offensive it can have alot of potetntial and not too mention that this is a low risk high reward experiment in the first place...we lose his giant contract this year or the next i believe.
Do you have any idea what you're talking about? I actually wonder whether you watched any of the games Raptors have played , cause our interior defense is not the problem right now, its our perimeter defense.
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
- AB_21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,535
- And1: 23
- Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
Do it after a two game winning streak and after a two game losing streak.
I'm guessing radically different results.
I'm guessing radically different results.
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
- rewill17
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,926
- And1: 271
- Joined: May 29, 2007
- Location: Pickering
Re: RealGM Ratings: Sam: 29%, BC: 56%
dino-might4life wrote:rewill17 wrote: I agree that having JO and CB4 combo is defensivily a very weak duo, but offensive it can have alot of potetntial and not too mention that this is a low risk high reward experiment in the first place...we lose his giant contract this year or the next i believe.
Do you have any idea what you're talking about? I actually wonder whether you watched any of the games Raptors have played , cause our interior defense is not the problem right now, its our perimeter defense.
???
read again