Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31)

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

Crunch 99
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 3,864
Joined: Jan 05, 2017
 

Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#1 » by Crunch 99 » Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:30 pm

We are playing the Spurs again, this time around without our second and third leading scorers, Clarkson and Sexton.

https://www.rotowire.com/basketball/nba-lineups.php
Image
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,638
And1: 795
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#2 » by bkohler » Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:34 pm

Shows how awful the Spurs are that this should be an easy with for the Jazz without Clarkson/Sexton. I expect a big game from Olynyk.
Jiipee84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 239
Joined: Feb 08, 2019
     

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#3 » by Jiipee84 » Wed Mar 1, 2023 4:43 am

****ing embarrassing to lose one of ********* NBA teams in your home arena.
Markkanen only 1 point in 4th quarter that's ****ing pathetic for allstar player.
Is this team seriously interested to get into play-in games or not.

How many times it needs to say if this current tanking mode continues next 2 years
the chances for that Lauri signs extension with Jazz gets quite thin / slim.

Lauri has watched enough tanking in Chicago
so if Jazz cannot impress Lauri on that Jazz are playoff team 2025-2026 season he will not stay in Utah.
Keep mind NBA's new TV contract should be done summer 2025 and that will mean those players ( including Lauri )
who are UFA's that year will get big moneys when cap space rises.

Lauri has done his part to impress Jazz and Danny Ainge.
Now it is Danny's turn to do his part to get Lauri staying in Utah after summer 2025 and tanking will not help that.
SoCalJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,479
And1: 1,078
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#4 » by SoCalJazzFan » Wed Mar 1, 2023 5:40 am

Jiipee84 wrote:****ing embarrassing to lose one of ********* NBA teams in your home arena.
Markkanen only 1 point in 4th quarter that's ****ing pathetic for allstar player.
Is this team seriously interested to get into play-in games or not.

How many times it needs to say if this current tanking mode continues next 2 years
the chances for that Lauri signs extension with Jazz gets quite thin / slim.

Lauri has watched enough tanking in Chicago
so if Jazz cannot impress Lauri on that Jazz are playoff team 2025-2026 season he will not stay in Utah.
Keep mind NBA's new TV contract should be done summer 2025 and that will mean those players ( including Lauri )
who are UFA's that year will get big moneys when cap space rises.

Lauri has done his part to impress Jazz and Danny Ainge.
Now it is Danny's turn to do his part to get Lauri staying in Utah after summer 2025 and tanking will not help that.

Kind of a ridiculous take, IMO. You're mixing the end of this season with the players they still have on the team with moves to be made over the summer and next season. A) They are mutually exclusive. B) tanking right now doesn't prevent any moves this summer or next season or two (they'll have a ton of cap space and draft picks to make moves) and losing most likely gets a better player in the draft in the process. Sounds like a win win to me.
Jiipee84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 239
Joined: Feb 08, 2019
     

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#5 » by Jiipee84 » Wed Mar 1, 2023 5:55 am

SoCalJazzFan wrote:
Jiipee84 wrote:****ing embarrassing to lose one of ********* NBA teams in your home arena.
Markkanen only 1 point in 4th quarter that's ****ing pathetic for allstar player.
Is this team seriously interested to get into play-in games or not.

How many times it needs to say if this current tanking mode continues next 2 years
the chances for that Lauri signs extension with Jazz gets quite thin / slim.

Lauri has watched enough tanking in Chicago
so if Jazz cannot impress Lauri on that Jazz are playoff team 2025-2026 season he will not stay in Utah.
Keep mind NBA's new TV contract should be done summer 2025 and that will mean those players ( including Lauri )
who are UFA's that year will get big moneys when cap space rises.

Lauri has done his part to impress Jazz and Danny Ainge.
Now it is Danny's turn to do his part to get Lauri staying in Utah after summer 2025 and tanking will not help that.

Kind of a ridiculous take, IMO. You're mixing the end of this season with the players they still have on the team with moves to be made over the summer and next season. A) They are mutually exclusive. B) tanking right now doesn't prevent any moves this summer or next season or two (they'll have a ton of cap space and draft picks to make moves) and losing most likely gets a better player in the draft in the process. Sounds like a win win to me.


Ainge and Zanik have to watch all the players and all the talent available including all-stars and potential all-stars.
No options should be ruled out and it would be best to be ready to change the original plans as well.
And go win now mode if the opportunity arises and tanking clearly does not work.
BigJimFinn
Junior
Posts: 448
And1: 419
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#6 » by BigJimFinn » Wed Mar 1, 2023 6:38 am

Now that was fugly. I expected most Jazz games to look like this after the trade, but two G-league squads having a competition in throwing bricks and passes to fans is hard on the eyes. If Hardy keeps up with THT as starting "point guard" they won't sniff .500 again, which I guess would be a good thing.
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,154
And1: 8,422
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#7 » by Inigo Montoya » Wed Mar 1, 2023 10:29 am

We had a lineup of Dunn, Fontecchio, Toscano-Anderson, Juzang and Gay at some point. No other explanation needed for the outcome.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
edededtut
Senior
Posts: 525
And1: 699
Joined: Dec 28, 2019

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#8 » by edededtut » Wed Mar 1, 2023 12:49 pm

the closing lineup of dunn-tht-lauri-olynyk-kessler wasn't particularly beautiful either.
Crunch 99
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 3,864
Joined: Jan 05, 2017
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#9 » by Crunch 99 » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:22 pm

It was great to see THT hit hit shots at a good %, but he spoiled his overall performance with the 7 tovs. The 7 tovs were especially disappointing after he had 5 tovs Saturday against the same team. This game was his chance to clean up the tovs.
SoCalJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,479
And1: 1,078
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#10 » by SoCalJazzFan » Wed Mar 1, 2023 6:19 pm

Ochai looked really good last night, until he got injured.

THT has next to zero passing and lobbing touch. I wonder if that is something he can develop. He is young and I'm willing to see how he develops the rest of this season and next.

Fontechio is a train wreck. If he was 21 I would be more patient with him. I wonder who the scout was that thought he would be so great in the NBA.

Anyone know why Damian Jones didn't play? This one is a head scratcher.
User avatar
FranchisePlayer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2019
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#11 » by FranchisePlayer » Wed Mar 1, 2023 7:08 pm

el_Diablo wrote:the closing lineup of dunn-tht-lauri-olynyk-kessler wasn't particularly beautiful either.


From what I saw Olynyk didn't have a clue in this game. :noway:

Clarkson out and the result is on the score board. He has matured his game as the season has progressed and a part of me thinks keeping him with a higher deal than you'd like to pay might be wise.

Remember, the dopes in Chicago didn't believe Markkanen was worth of 18 M per season! Sure Clarkson is older but I have a vibe perhaps he's yet to hit his peak.

Fontecchio 0/7. And the reason for him being in the rotation... :noway:
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.

12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.
User avatar
FranchisePlayer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2019
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#12 » by FranchisePlayer » Wed Mar 1, 2023 7:12 pm

BigJimFinn wrote:Now that was fugly. I expected most Jazz games to look like this after the trade, but two G-league squads having a competition in throwing bricks and passes to fans is hard on the eyes. If Hardy keeps up with THT as starting "point guard" they won't sniff .500 again, which I guess would be a good thing.


I believe it's called evaluation. He's only 22 and never been a bona fide starter.

My concern with him is his fit - does 6-4 really need 234 lb?
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.

12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.
BigJimFinn
Junior
Posts: 448
And1: 419
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#13 » by BigJimFinn » Wed Mar 1, 2023 8:33 pm

FranchisePlayer wrote:
BigJimFinn wrote:Now that was fugly. I expected most Jazz games to look like this after the trade, but two G-league squads having a competition in throwing bricks and passes to fans is hard on the eyes. If Hardy keeps up with THT as starting "point guard" they won't sniff .500 again, which I guess would be a good thing.


I believe it's called evaluation. He's only 22 and never been a bona fide starter.

My concern with him is his fit - does 6-4 really need 234 lb?


Well, the evaluation thus far has shown that he can't dribble safely against pressure, create passing angles against denial D or make any passes to bigs on the move. I'd say those are pretty key skills for an NBA point guard, and it's a tricky position to pick up in later career if you haven't learned the fundamentals. You can improve decision making with coaching and experience, but if THT is to become a bona fide starter, it will be as a second-phase ballhandler, attacking rotations with those juggernaut drives. To do that effectively he also needs to become a real spot-up shooting threat from 3.
The weight I don't see as a problem; he has a uniquely wide and top-heavy frame, which allows him to play much bigger than 6-4, easily guarding SFs and overpowering guards. I don't know why he should aspire to playing PG and losing weight to improve lateral quickness, instead of being a PJ Tucker with added driving threat.
edededtut
Senior
Posts: 525
And1: 699
Joined: Dec 28, 2019

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#14 » by edededtut » Wed Mar 1, 2023 8:57 pm

FranchisePlayer wrote:
el_Diablo wrote:the closing lineup of dunn-tht-lauri-olynyk-kessler wasn't particularly beautiful either.


From what I saw Olynyk didn't have a clue in this game. :noway:

Clarkson out and the result is on the score board. He has matured his game as the season has progressed and a part of me thinks keeping him with a higher deal than you'd like to pay might be wise.

Remember, the dopes in Chicago didn't believe Markkanen was worth of 18 M per season! Sure Clarkson is older but I have a vibe perhaps he's yet to hit his peak.

Fontecchio 0/7. And the reason for him being in the rotation... :noway:


In the 4th quarter the Jazz looked a bit like the Lakers before the trades - no spacing at all with dunn or tht and kessler off the ball and therefore no space to get anyone going. I’m sure conley or some other actual pg could have managed to find some looks for someone but tht and dunn are what they are so the end result was a lot of dribbling.

Even if fontecchio missed everything yesterday at least the spurs defended him at the perimeter.. but he did have an awful game and didn’t really deserve any extra minutes.

In the end the injury to Ochai was the last straw with Clarkson and Sexton already out. I’m sure jazz would have won had he been available for a full game. He has been really impressive considering he started the season by collecting DNP-CDs.

Obviously one can criticize Lauri for not being able to do much in the 4th but even lebron kept losing this season when grouped with non-shooters..
User avatar
FranchisePlayer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2019
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#15 » by FranchisePlayer » Wed Mar 1, 2023 9:02 pm

BigJimFinn wrote:
FranchisePlayer wrote:
BigJimFinn wrote:Now that was fugly. I expected most Jazz games to look like this after the trade, but two G-league squads having a competition in throwing bricks and passes to fans is hard on the eyes. If Hardy keeps up with THT as starting "point guard" they won't sniff .500 again, which I guess would be a good thing.


I believe it's called evaluation. He's only 22 and never been a bona fide starter.

My concern with him is his fit - does 6-4 really need 234 lb?


Well, the evaluation thus far has shown that he can't dribble safely against pressure, create passing angles against denial D or make any passes to bigs on the move. I'd say those are pretty key skills for an NBA point guard, and it's a tricky position to pick up in later career if you haven't learned the fundamentals. You can improve decision making with coaching and experience, but if THT is to become a bona fide starter, it will be as a second-phase ballhandler, attacking rotations with those juggernaut drives. To do that effectively he also needs to become a real spot-up shooting threat from 3.
The weight I don't see as a problem; he has a uniquely wide and top-heavy frame, which allows him to play much bigger than 6-4, easily guarding SFs and overpowering guards. I don't know why he should aspire to playing PG and losing weight to improve lateral quickness, instead of being a PJ Tucker with added driving threat.


Long determined conclusions based on 4 games, eh?! The leash is definitely longer than that.

Feels like I've gone through this type of discussion back in 2018-2021 in the Bulls forum. lol
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.

12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.
User avatar
FranchisePlayer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2019
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#16 » by FranchisePlayer » Wed Mar 1, 2023 9:16 pm

el_Diablo wrote:
FranchisePlayer wrote:
el_Diablo wrote:the closing lineup of dunn-tht-lauri-olynyk-kessler wasn't particularly beautiful either.


From what I saw Olynyk didn't have a clue in this game. :noway:

Clarkson out and the result is on the score board. He has matured his game as the season has progressed and a part of me thinks keeping him with a higher deal than you'd like to pay might be wise.

Remember, the dopes in Chicago didn't believe Markkanen was worth of 18 M per season! Sure Clarkson is older but I have a vibe perhaps he's yet to hit his peak.

Fontecchio 0/7. And the reason for him being in the rotation... :noway:


In the 4th quarter the Jazz looked a bit like the Lakers before the trades - no spacing at all with dunn or tht and kessler off the ball and therefore no space to get anyone going. I’m sure conley or some other actual pg could have managed to find some looks for someone but tht and dunn are what they are so the end result was a lot of dribbling.

Even if fontecchio missed everything yesterday at least the spurs defended him at the perimeter.. but he did have an awful game and didn’t really deserve any extra minutes.

In the end the injury to Ochai was the last straw with Clarkson and Sexton already out. I’m sure jazz would have won had he been available for a full game. He has been really impressive considering he started the season by collecting DNP-CDs.

Obviously one can criticize Lauri for not being able to do much in the 4th but even lebron kept losing this season when grouped with non-shooters..


One can criticize anyone, for sure, in a time of loss. Call me biased but really hard to see how Markkanen's performance on this occasion could end up in the spotlight.

But yeah, the lack of floor general makes sometimes things look even uglier than what they are. The Jazz shouldn't be this incompetent of getting looks for players. Olynyk had 0 FGA inside the arc in 30 min., astonishing.
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.

12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.
BigJimFinn
Junior
Posts: 448
And1: 419
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#17 » by BigJimFinn » Thu Mar 2, 2023 7:13 am

FranchisePlayer wrote:
BigJimFinn wrote:
FranchisePlayer wrote:
I believe it's called evaluation. He's only 22 and never been a bona fide starter.

My concern with him is his fit - does 6-4 really need 234 lb?


Well, the evaluation thus far has shown that he can't dribble safely against pressure, create passing angles against denial D or make any passes to bigs on the move. I'd say those are pretty key skills for an NBA point guard, and it's a tricky position to pick up in later career if you haven't learned the fundamentals. You can improve decision making with coaching and experience, but if THT is to become a bona fide starter, it will be as a second-phase ballhandler, attacking rotations with those juggernaut drives. To do that effectively he also needs to become a real spot-up shooting threat from 3.
The weight I don't see as a problem; he has a uniquely wide and top-heavy frame, which allows him to play much bigger than 6-4, easily guarding SFs and overpowering guards. I don't know why he should aspire to playing PG and losing weight to improve lateral quickness, instead of being a PJ Tucker with added driving threat.


Long determined conclusions based on 4 games, eh?! The leash is definitely longer than that.

Feels like I've gone through this type of discussion back in 2018-2021 in the Bulls forum. lol


THT has played 180 NBA games, 3700 minutes, over 4 seasons. The case of Lauri doesn't mean that every player is capable of making a huge leap in mid-career, and THT wasn't a high lottery pick; he was a great find at 46th. I agree though that his leash may well reach to the end of this season, because getting to play-in is not a priority, to state it mildly, and you can justify it by evaluation. I am just saying that it will lead to ugly games and more losses, and most likely will not reveal him to be a major ballhandling talent.
User avatar
FranchisePlayer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2019
 

Re: Game 63: San Antonio Spurs (14-47) @ Utah Jazz (31-31) 

Post#18 » by FranchisePlayer » Thu Mar 2, 2023 6:37 pm

BigJimFinn wrote:
FranchisePlayer wrote:
BigJimFinn wrote:
Well, the evaluation thus far has shown that he can't dribble safely against pressure, create passing angles against denial D or make any passes to bigs on the move. I'd say those are pretty key skills for an NBA point guard, and it's a tricky position to pick up in later career if you haven't learned the fundamentals. You can improve decision making with coaching and experience, but if THT is to become a bona fide starter, it will be as a second-phase ballhandler, attacking rotations with those juggernaut drives. To do that effectively he also needs to become a real spot-up shooting threat from 3.
The weight I don't see as a problem; he has a uniquely wide and top-heavy frame, which allows him to play much bigger than 6-4, easily guarding SFs and overpowering guards. I don't know why he should aspire to playing PG and losing weight to improve lateral quickness, instead of being a PJ Tucker with added driving threat.


Long determined conclusions based on 4 games, eh?! The leash is definitely longer than that.

Feels like I've gone through this type of discussion back in 2018-2021 in the Bulls forum. lol


THT has played 180 NBA games, 3700 minutes, over 4 seasons. The case of Lauri doesn't mean that every player is capable of making a huge leap in mid-career, and THT wasn't a high lottery pick; he was a great find at 46th. I agree though that his leash may well reach to the end of this season, because getting to play-in is not a priority, to state it mildly, and you can justify it by evaluation. I am just saying that it will lead to ugly games and more losses, and most likely will not reveal him to be a major ballhandling talent.


Just a reminder: Your original argument was "If Hardy keeps up with THT as starting "point guard" they won't sniff .500 again, which I guess would be a good thing." to which I commented the evaluation part.

Talen has played 180 games of which he's started in only 28 games and for the Jazz only 4: https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/hortota01.html Each franchise tend to make their own conclusions.

That's an awfully small sample size, don't you think? I wouldn't draw too many conclusions out of that.

The Bulls figured, based on roughly 200 games, Markkanen isn't worth around $18 M a season so the bigger sample size obviously doesn't guarantee you anything.

But it's plain common sense and a necessity to see more.
MrSparkle wrote:I don't see a scenario here or there where Lauri becomes the "7-pick we thought he could be." If you remove his 3P ability, he's worse than Felicio by a mile.

12/2/2022
I like the quote- it makes me chuckle. And it was/is pretty much true.

Return to Utah Jazz