David Lee or Paul Milsap?

3960HOOD · Post #1 » by **3960HOOD** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 5:00 am

Both are free agents, if you were a GM and had a choice between the two who would you pick?

Post #2 » by **jazzfan1971** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 5:05 am

I'd take Millsap. More shot blocking.

edfmx86 · Post #3 » by **edfmx86** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 6:10 am

Millsap just cause im a Millsap fan

CAE15 · Post #4 » by **CAE15** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 6:59 am

millsap should come 2 or 3 per cheaper then lee, so i'd take millsap, if it was an identical contract i would have to think about it, but probably would take lee, when it was all said and done.

LjJazzman · Post #5 » by **LjJazzman** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 9:21 am

I love Sap but i'd take Lee in a second.

TheGameWinner · Post #6 » by **TheGameWinner** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 12:28 pm

I really hope this is a joke. David Lee plays absolutely no defense. He benefits from playing on a bad team.

Milsap put up numbers on a playoff team.

MILSAP ALL DAY.

carrottop12 · Post #7 » by **carrottop12** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 1:50 pm

Lee doesn't play any defense, but he's a better rebounder and scorer then Paul Millsap is.

It's hard to measure how much playing on a bad team does for you vs. being on a playoff team, but Lee brings it every single night, I don't feel as comfortable saying that about Millsap.

HolyToledo · Post #8 » by **HolyToledo** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 2:54 pm

Both are the type of players you want on your team. They produce and hustle. I probably take Lee because he has better offensive skills. I would sign either of these guys over Boozer.

UTJazzFan_Echo1 · Post #9 » by **UTJazzFan_Echo1** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 3:05 pm

Millsap hands down. He brings hustle and heart every night and he is a fan favorite. Lee doesn't do anything much better then Millsap can so why go after him?

Lava Rock Kid · Post #10 » by **Lava Rock Kid** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 3:33 pm

Lee,

He is a better scorer, rebounder, passer. And he is taller than milsap. Millsap is short for a power forward that is why he slipped into the 2nd round.

I think he is a better defensive player too.

But he will command more money than millsap.

carrottop12 · Post #11 » by **carrottop12** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 3:55 pm

Lava Rock Kid wrote:Lee,

He is a better scorer, rebounder, passer. And he is taller than milsap. Millsap is short for a power forward that is why he slipped into the 2nd round.

I think he is a better defensive player too.

But he will command more money than millsap.

He's certainly not a better defensive player. But his defensive rebounding is a huge plus.

JDubJazz · Post #12 » by **JDubJazz** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 4:15 pm

Lee in a heartbeat. I'm tired of undersized Jazz bigs.

outerspacefella · Post #13 » by **outerspacefella** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 6:20 pm

Batronuj wrote:...It's hard to measure how much playing on a bad team does for you...

Well... think Kirilenko...

Anyway, Lee vs Millsap's a tough call.; Lee seems to be a little bit more consistent, while Millsap's a better rounded player; both rotation players in my eyes.

Guess I'd go with Millsap though...

Soul Patch · Post #14 » by **Soul Patch** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 7:26 pm

Millsap.

Batu7 · Post #15 » by **Batu7** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 8:19 pm

Lee, especially if Millsap wants 8-9 mil per season.

babyjax13 · Post #16 » by **babyjax13** » Tue Jun 9, 2009 8:24 pm

outerspacefella wrote:
Batronuj wrote:...It's hard to measure how much playing on a bad team does for you...

Well... think Kirilenko...

Anyway, Lee vs Millsap's a tough call.; Lee seems to be a little bit more consistent, while Millsap's a better rounded player; both rotation players in my eyes.

Guess I'd go with Millsap though...

That was a better team than people give them credit for. AK and Harpring would have brought us to the playoffs had they been healthy all year.