Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

finnegan
Banned User
Posts: 3,982
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 29, 2002
Location: Utah

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#21 » by finnegan » Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:10 pm

Fido wrote:There is a difference between paying some level of luxury tax and paying STUPID levels of luxury tax. ;)


Congratulations on a successful trade.
Due to Utah and Chicago being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Utah and Chicago had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here.


Utah Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Tyrus Thomas
Kirk Hinrich
Outgoing Players
Carlos Boozer

Chicago Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Carlos Boozer
Outgoing Players
Tyrus Thomas
Kirk Hinrich

So roughly speaking Utah is taking on an additional %25 of Boozers salary. Lets say $3 million per year.

How much is a playoff game worth in revenue to the Jazz? 20,000 seats at an average of $50 is $1,000,000. So an extra series is worth roughly $5,000,000

Seems like a reasonable investment to me!
hoops4life
General Manager
Posts: 9,121
And1: 31
Joined: May 17, 2005

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#22 » by hoops4life » Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:17 pm

Right but they will have to pay dollar for dollar everything that they are over and they don't get the piece of pie from the other teams that are already over.

How far over the tax are they in your scenario above?
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,975
And1: 12,963
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#23 » by dice » Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:37 pm

finnegan wrote:Utah Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Tyrus Thomas
Kirk Hinrich
Outgoing Players
Carlos Boozer

roughly speaking Utah is taking on an additional %25 of Boozers salary. Lets say $3 million per year.

How much is a playoff game worth in revenue to the Jazz? 20,000 seats at an average of $50 is $1,000,000. So an extra series is worth roughly $5,000,000

Seems like a reasonable investment to me!

hoops4life wrote:Right but they will have to pay dollar for dollar everything that they are over and they don't get the piece of pie from the other teams that are already over.

that's the biggest point. also:

1) it's unlikely you gain an additional playoff round simply by acquiring hinrich and thomas
2) let's say your $1 mil/game figure is correct (accounting for expenses and other revenue as well). you're going to get an average of 3 home games per series, not 5
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
Marc
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,267
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#24 » by Marc » Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:48 pm

dice wrote:1) it's unlikely you gain an additional playoff round simply by acquiring hinrich and thomas


You lose Boozer... Not sure how that helps to make the playoffs.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,975
And1: 12,963
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#25 » by dice » Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:04 pm

Marc wrote:
dice wrote:1) it's unlikely you gain an additional playoff round simply by acquiring hinrich and thomas


You lose Boozer... Not sure how that helps to make the playoffs.

losing boozer is already assumed. the question is whether the additional lux tax required to keep hinrich is worthwhile instead of shipping him to portland. i think the answer is clearly no
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
hoops4life
General Manager
Posts: 9,121
And1: 31
Joined: May 17, 2005

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#26 » by hoops4life » Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:08 pm

David Locke from 1320 stated that it is about $1mil per home playoff game. I think that he is saying 3 home games first round 2 home games the second round?

Still that is only $5million. Jazz will lose out on more than that amount from just the payout the other teams make.
finnegan
Banned User
Posts: 3,982
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 29, 2002
Location: Utah

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#27 » by finnegan » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:38 pm

dice wrote:1) it's unlikely you gain an additional playoff round simply by acquiring hinrich and thomas


My prediction that it advances the Jazz an additional round, and your prediction that it does not are equally accurate at this point. But if you look at it from a perspective of "losses and gains", then I think that the Jazz come out ahead.

At the most basic level, we are getting more back than we are giving up, because Milsap is not a terrible drop off from Boozer, yet Hinrich brings a new dimension and Thomas as a backup to Milsap eases with the drop off at PF.

There are three additional factors to consider:

1) Flexibility,
2) Style of Play,
3) Raw talent or skill level.

1) Hinrich definitely provides Sloan with new options or flexibility against certain teams
2) Hinrichs style of play is highly compatible with the Jazz's style (therefore he may actually improve)
3) Skill Level or Talent seems to be a dropoff in my mind from Boozer, but I'm counting on Milsap and Thomas blossoming with the the team structure. (i.e. more of an outside threat and ball distribution threat with Hinrich)

dice wrote:2) let's say your $1 mil/game figure is correct (accounting for expenses and other revenue as well). you're going to get an average of 3 home games per series, not 5


Good point! My mistake.

If Chicago actually wants more than Boozer, for Hinrich and Thomas, then I say no deal. Because top tier bigs like Boozer are worth more than solid guards like Hinrich.
hoops4life
General Manager
Posts: 9,121
And1: 31
Joined: May 17, 2005

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#28 » by hoops4life » Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:04 pm

If they want more, I am willing to throw in Harp, Korver, or Miles and a 2nd for good measure.
finnegan
Banned User
Posts: 3,982
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 29, 2002
Location: Utah

Re: Jazz should keep both Hinrich and Thomas 

Post#29 » by finnegan » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:34 pm

hoops4life wrote:If they want more, I am willing to throw in Harp, Korver, or Miles and a 2nd for good measure.


Yes. Harpring makes sense.

I wouldn't be willing to invlude Korver. I think that he is going to have a good year next year, now that his wrist injury has been addressed.

On the other hand, I'm perfectly happy to keep Boozer.

Return to Utah Jazz