Jefferson or Love

slambamJazz · Post #1 » by **slambamJazz** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:25 am

Favors the most likely pick at 4 for the T-Wolves. That should put Jefferson or Love on the trade markett. Love plus 16 pick for Tomic and 9 pick. The T-Wolves draft Favors and Henry . The Jazz get Love and 16 pick. Another trade the jazz trade Kirilenko and Tomic and 9 pick for Jefferson plus 16 and 23 picks.

kebutah · Post #2 » by **kebutah** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:18 pm

Just what we need another big who doesn't even play average defense.

carrottop12 · Post #3 » by **carrottop12** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:40 pm

I just don't see the Wolves trading Love.

Jefferson is the far more likely candidate to be moved.

QuantumMacgyver · Post #4 » by **QuantumMacgyver** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:21 pm

kebutah wrote:Just what we need another big who doesn't even play average defense.

Seriously? 14 and 11 at $3 million a year, and your gonna complain about the level of D he has played for the Minnesota Timberwolves. Not exactly the most defensive oriented/talented team in the league. I'd gladly welcome Love over Boozer! Even considering the lack of D. Honestly, how many players in the league are great at both ends of the court?

That being said, Normally I would laugh at a trade proposal like this, but Minnesota seems to be going crazy for another top 10 pick so.... could happen.

DByrne86 · Post #5 » by **DByrne86** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:38 am

I would like to see the Jazz sign and trade Boozer for Jefferson and a 1st.

kebutah · Post #6 » by **kebutah** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:38 pm

QuantumMacgyver wrote:
kebutah wrote:Just what we need another big who doesn't even play average defense.

Seriously? 14 and 11 at $3 million a year, and your gonna complain about the level of D he has played for the Minnesota Timberwolves. Not exactly the most defensive oriented/talented team in the league. I'd gladly welcome Love over Boozer! Even considering the lack of D. Honestly, how many players in the league are great at both ends of the court?

That being said, Normally I would laugh at a trade proposal like this, but Minnesota seems to be going crazy for another top 10 pick so.... could happen.

My complaint isn't that he isn't worth his salary. It is we would have a team similar to the one last year that can't beat the best teams. IMO this is a lateral move not a move forward.

Post #7 » by **revprodeji** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:18 pm

DByrne86 wrote:I would like to see the Jazz sign and trade Boozer for Jefferson and a 1st.

Why would MN do this?

If/when we move Al it is to open minutes up for Love and to focus more on the triangle offense. Al would be a great fit with DWill, but I do not see Utah being a good trade partner.

Master Amino · Post #8 » by **Master Amino** » Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:08 pm

I don't want Boozer....and Kahn's CERTAINLY not throwing in a 1st rounder even if a deal like that were to happen.

If you guys drafted George that would've helped the cause....but even then, there's not much else that would be enough to get a deal done that's reasonable (IE no D-Will involved).

UTJazzFan_Echo1 · Post #9 » by **UTJazzFan_Echo1** » Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:43 pm

Master Amino wrote:I don't want Boozer....and Kahn's CERTAINLY not throwing in a 1st rounder even if a deal like that were to happen.

If you guys drafted George that would've helped the cause....but even then, there's not much else that would be enough to get a deal done that's reasonable (IE no D-Will involved).

Please tell me you are joking about the D-Wll comment. AL has less value than Zach Randolph at the moment so I don't understand where you guys are getting the idea that you are going to get anything good for him. You guys should consider yourselfs lucky if we offered you AK....