Post#22 » by kamazilla » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:43 pm
In a free market, value is determined by supply and demand. There were no shortages of suitors for any of their own free agents the Jazz failed to secure before their contracts expired; clearly the demand is strong. Boozer and Korver each offer unique skill sets, which is to say the supply is extremely limited. Boozer's contract is perfectly reasonable for the skills he offers. So is Korver's. The failure by the Jazz is not recognizing the value in the assets they had. If they really didn't anticipate the nature of this years market, it only serves to prove the point that management has been ineffective.
If anyone questions what is meant by the exodus of players out of Utah, I would question if they paying any attention whatsoever. Should the Jazz not match Portland's offer, Matthews would make three(!) starters and two primary bench players who have left since the beginning of last season.
Boozer, Korver, Brewer, Matthews and Maynor. Throw a decent center into that line-up and you would have a passable first six rotation. Now, what the hell we're y'all sayin' about management doing such a fine job? Lets just stop trying whitewash this thing and acknowledge what is- the Jazz are sacrificing the competitive prospects of the team over the next two seasons, at the likely cost of loosing D-Will, all in the name of advantageous financial positioning in anticipation of the new CBA.