Still upset over the Hayward pick?

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

erudite23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,857
And1: 660
Joined: Jun 14, 2004

Re: Still upset over the Hayward pick? 

Post#41 » by erudite23 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:12 am

I hated it then and I hate it now.

But hating it isn't conducive to being a fan, so I try to let it go and root for the kid as much as possible. I've been surprised with his talents, particularly how efficient he seems to be and how he provides solid contributions without hurting you with mistakes for broken plays.

But I still hate it. To me, you have to find a way to make that pick pay. It was the one resource that could elevate this team from being a nice 50-win team to a true contender. I don't think Hayward does that for us. We needed someone that could make a difference. I think Ed Davis is that guy. If we drafted Davis instead and used our exception on acquiring a stud wing, I think we'd be ahead of where we are right now. I think Ed Davis has a chance to be a star in this league.

Even if we don't take Davis, I think Aldrich would have given us a dimension we haven't had here for a long time.


How will it play out? I dunno. I'm rooting for Hayward to make me eat my words and to become the swingman version of John Stockton. Don't think it will happen, though.
User avatar
jazzfan1971
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,327
And1: 8,581
Joined: Jul 16, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City
 

Re: Still upset over the Hayward pick? 

Post#42 » by jazzfan1971 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:23 am

Yeah, I wanted Davis myself. If Davis has a better career than Hayward I'll be pretty mad.

However, if you had told me we'd get Jefferson and Hayward, I would have been estatic. So, I guess I'm pretty good.
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
mattg
General Manager
Posts: 7,971
And1: 3,460
Joined: Feb 12, 2007

Re: Still upset over the Hayward pick? 

Post#43 » by mattg » Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:33 am

ad15vt wrote:Paul george would have brought instant offense from the 2/3 and a 3pt threat. i think it would have been more valuable.

paul george has looked like poop.
JDubJazz
Analyst
Posts: 3,156
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 19, 2005
Location: along for the ride
       

Re: Still upset over the Hayward pick? 

Post#44 » by JDubJazz » Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:05 am

I'm terrified that Hayward is going to end up being Morris Almond 2.0
--J-Dub--
User avatar
Awoooga
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,964
And1: 20
Joined: Apr 07, 2003

Re: Still upset over the Hayward pick? 

Post#45 » by Awoooga » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:12 am

The one saving grace you have is that it was not your own pick. It sucks alot more when teams "earn" picks and see them traded away for a player that is no longer on the team. 8-)

I would not have picked Haywood either but he is what you have. Make the best of it.
eyeontheprize
Sophomore
Posts: 110
And1: 18
Joined: May 23, 2010

Re: Still upset over the Hayward pick? 

Post#46 » by eyeontheprize » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:43 am

George has looked horrible so far. Go check the numbers.
User avatar
Nate505
RealGM
Posts: 13,724
And1: 13,526
Joined: Oct 29, 2001
Location: Denver, CO
       

Re: Still upset over the Hayward pick? 

Post#47 » by Nate505 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:39 am

He looks real tentative out there so far. I hope he can get that under control. He seems to have skill, so maybe he just needs to get comfortable on the court. Tonight was the first time I got to see him, and while he wasn't impressive I didn't seem to notice him getting killed out there either. Honestly, not many plays were run for him, although he didn't make much out of the few that were. I still think he can settle down and learn the offense and make a solid contribution this season, but it's not happening in the pre-season so far. Then again, all it takes is a couple of good games to get his confidence going.

Return to Utah Jazz