Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position?

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#61 » by carrottop12 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:21 pm

jazzfan1971 wrote:I'm gonna be in teh minority here, but, I never felt like we were being abused by bigs with Jefferson and Millsap out there. Night in and night out I felt like it was opposing guards lighting us up.

It's true that if we had Dwight and Duncan as our bigs those guards would face more resistance once they beat their man, but, overall I didn't think our interior defense was a problem. By my eye where we really struggled was on teh perimeter. Miles and Bell both seemed a little slow of foot to me and Harris wasn't a terrific defender either, although he was ok.

I'd think if we had a nice defender at the wing to run with hayward (Matthews perhaps???) and a 3rd swing off the bench that was a good defender, you'd see our overall defense looking much better.


Well, the numbers show that Millsap allowed opposing players to shoot 54% on him for the season, one of the absolute worst in the league, in comparison, Derrick Favors allowed opposing players to shoot 40% against him. Al Jefferson was in the middle at 48%.

You just can't have a guy who is going to let a guy shoot 50%+ every single night against you, especially at the PF position.
User avatar
jazzfan1971
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,327
And1: 8,581
Joined: Jul 16, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City
 

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#62 » by jazzfan1971 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:29 pm

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Maybe that's a good stat, but, my eyeballs didn't see a big deficiency as a defender from Sap.
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
Jazzfan12
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,294
And1: 213
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#63 » by Jazzfan12 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:48 pm

Bat wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:I'm gonna be in teh minority here, but, I never felt like we were being abused by bigs with Jefferson and Millsap out there. Night in and night out I felt like it was opposing guards lighting us up.

It's true that if we had Dwight and Duncan as our bigs those guards would face more resistance once they beat their man, but, overall I didn't think our interior defense was a problem. By my eye where we really struggled was on teh perimeter. Miles and Bell both seemed a little slow of foot to me and Harris wasn't a terrific defender either, although he was ok.

I'd think if we had a nice defender at the wing to run with hayward (Matthews perhaps???) and a 3rd swing off the bench that was a good defender, you'd see our overall defense looking much better.


Well, the numbers show that Millsap allowed opposing players to shoot 54% on him for the season, one of the absolute worst in the league, in comparison, Derrick Favors allowed opposing players to shoot 40% against him. Al Jefferson was in the middle at 48%.

You just can't have a guy who is going to let a guy shoot 50%+ every single night against you, especially at the PF position.



Comparing Millsap and Al's numbers straight up is misleading. Millsap plays the most stacked position in the league, Al plays the position with the least amount of talent in the league.
Litany
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,017
And1: 816
Joined: Mar 09, 2011
   

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#64 » by Litany » Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:09 pm

Jazzfan12 wrote:
Bat wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:I'm gonna be in teh minority here, but, I never felt like we were being abused by bigs with Jefferson and Millsap out there. Night in and night out I felt like it was opposing guards lighting us up.

It's true that if we had Dwight and Duncan as our bigs those guards would face more resistance once they beat their man, but, overall I didn't think our interior defense was a problem. By my eye where we really struggled was on teh perimeter. Miles and Bell both seemed a little slow of foot to me and Harris wasn't a terrific defender either, although he was ok.

I'd think if we had a nice defender at the wing to run with hayward (Matthews perhaps???) and a 3rd swing off the bench that was a good defender, you'd see our overall defense looking much better.


Well, the numbers show that Millsap allowed opposing players to shoot 54% on him for the season, one of the absolute worst in the league, in comparison, Derrick Favors allowed opposing players to shoot 40% against him. Al Jefferson was in the middle at 48%.

You just can't have a guy who is going to let a guy shoot 50%+ every single night against you, especially at the PF position.



Comparing Millsap and Al's numbers straight up is misleading. Millsap plays the most stacked position in the league, Al plays the position with the least amount of talent in the league.


Can we see a breakdown of Millsap vs the other starting PF's in the league? I'd be interested in that. Meaning, what do other starting PF's allow?
carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#65 » by carrottop12 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:33 pm

I'm trying to find it on 82games, David Locke did almost two shows on the article. Millsap was ranked right along with David lee, Fujian Blair and Channing frye as one of the very worst on the league, ak was 5th best.
eLo
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,732
And1: 132
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
       

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#66 » by eLo » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:41 pm

Bat wrote:Millsap was ranked right along with David lee, Fujian Blair and Channing frye as one of the very worst on the league, ak was 5th best
wow i didnt now that, i always treat sap as very good defender, ok some machups are really bad for him , like vs Aldridge, but still that what you just told really surprised me, i mean comparing Sap to Frye in def that shouldt happen.

Ok i now that probably it was used lots of time in that subject, but if Artest can play with success as sf so can Sap, specially with that much better stroke.
rampage_jazzman
Ballboy
Posts: 4
And1: 0
Joined: May 02, 2011

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#67 » by rampage_jazzman » Tue May 3, 2011 9:23 pm

JazzD15 wrote:With the arrival of Favors who many (including me) believe is the future starting PF of this team, there have been many questions looming about the future of Paul Millsap on this team.

I like seeing Favors and Jefferson together on the floor and I think that they work well together and this will only get better as time goes.

Where does that leave Millsap? I want to go on record saying Paul Millsap is one of my favorite players in the NBA. I am not alone on this obviously which is why his jersey was the #1 jersey sold of any Jazz player this year (I saw this statistic back in December, so yes, that included when Deron was here). He is such a hard worker and he has improved EVERY year.

I think that is why people have felt like they are caught in a tough place. I have at least. I love Millsap, but I see the problems that having him start at the PF position creates, mostly on the defensive end.

I questioned people when they said why don't we move Paul Millsap to the SF position and have him start there. I didn't think it would really work and I didn't think it was a good idea initially. But now that I have had some time to think about it I think it is a great idea that we should seriously consider.

I don't know what the Jazz have planned for AK. I think he can do great things on the court, but I don't know that we will be able to sign him at a reasonable price, or if we should. If he does not play anymore games for the rest of the season, he will have missed over 23% of the games in his career due to injury. That is huge in my eyes. If they can keep him for cheap, maybe, but I am guessing he will be offered more than we should match.

Regardless, I like the idea of a starting lineup of:

Jefferson
Favors
Millsap
Hayward
Harris

With the backups being C.J., Evans, whatever role players they want to keep and the draft picks from this year (I hope its Derrick Williams or Harrison Barnes and Brandon Knight, but that is for discussion in another thread :)).

One example that comes to mind when thinking of a SF with the same body as Paul and about the same height is Ron Artest.

Ron Artest is 6-7' and weighs 260 pounds and Millsap is 6-8' and weighs 250.

He has had success at that position and we all know that Millsap has a better shot than Artest and IMO an overall better offensive game than he does.

If anyone can make the move to make this work its Paul. He is such a hard worker and if he decides to do this, he could get leaner and quicker in the offseason to make it work.

I look forward to hearing all of your thoughts on this matter.



Young lineup... I am just wondering where the consisteny 3pt shot will be coming from...
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,070
And1: 17,590
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#68 » by babyjax13 » Tue May 3, 2011 9:30 pm

Hayward shoots at a 40% clip and Paul/Harris will hover between 30-35%. As I've said before, I think Paul is more effective at small forward and I also think that with our personnel this team is perfect for a triangle offense.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

Re: Can Paul Millsap make the move to the SF position? 

Post#69 » by carrottop12 » Tue May 3, 2011 9:55 pm

Yikes, I think we have a terrible system for the triangle offense. Outside of Hayward and Favors, (and even then Favors is a relative unknown on his passing ability) I feel we are an average or below average passing team, that bodes horribly for the triangle. Also, you usually want a big, physical guard capable of spreading the defense in the triangle, again, terrible for Harris.

Return to Utah Jazz