I know we've all been down this road before, but rumblings are that this lockout is drawing close to a resolution. Hunter and Stern have both hinted at the possibility of still playing 82 games. More back-to-backs, more travel, heightening risk of injuries.
Would you all rather 82 games this year, or a traditional schedule without the fews few weeks of the season?
82 games, or less?
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
82 games, or less?
-
QuantumMacgyver
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,453
- And1: 42
- Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Re: 82 games, or less?
-
babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,073
- And1: 17,590
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: 82 games, or less?
I think they are receiving pressure from the small market teams to do the full 82 games. Without that revenue many won't be able to keep their lease.
JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: 82 games, or less?
-
FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 18,794
- And1: 2,162
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: 82 games, or less?
I rather 82 games and finish the season in early May and playoff in late june-early July.
Re: 82 games, or less?
-
HolyToledo
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,110
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Re: 82 games, or less?
I think extending the length of the season makes sense to get all 82 games. In fact, there is a report that the league is contacting arenas in that regard.
I have always thought that the season at 82 was too long but the league wants to make money so makes sense to do that and play it out.
I have always thought that the season at 82 was too long but the league wants to make money so makes sense to do that and play it out.
Top 4 seed in the West!!! Guaranteed!!!