The Jazz have always been a team under Sloan that emphasized the extra pass which helped the Jazz usually lead the league in shooting but also turnovers. In fact, Dwill at times was a turnover machine. This year our assists are down but usually getting 20+ assists per game and Hayward getting alot of assists recently, but turnovers are way down. The Jazz shooting percentage also way down.
I can only explain this by the fact the Jazz are still passing the ball but not making the extra pass, but also not getting alot turnovers. I like the way we are playing but we need to hit some of these outside shots which will also help our assists totals. Of course, it is also clear our PG play needs to improve. Just seems weird to me to have games like the Lakers game where we had like only 11 turnovers.
why less turnovers?
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
why less turnovers?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,110
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
why less turnovers?
Top 4 seed in the West!!! Guaranteed!!!
Re: why less turnovers?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,169
- And1: 73
- Joined: Jul 08, 2006
Re: why less turnovers?
Easier plays and passes right now and less individual ball handling are the main factor there methinks.
Re: why less turnovers?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,602
- And1: 30
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: why you take out my sig for?
Re: why less turnovers?
Al Jefferson being the main offensive cog has a ton to do with it. Bash him all you want, but he doesn't turn the ball over.
Hayward ability to be a distributor helps as well, but mostly it's Al.
Hayward ability to be a distributor helps as well, but mostly it's Al.
Re: why less turnovers?
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 18,794
- And1: 2,162
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: why less turnovers?
Based in what I watched, the team are not sharing the ball as they did under Sloan.
There's less TO, but there's a lot of individual plays like Howard or Jefferson. So, less TO but less good shots. Our % is really bad.
In the other hand, Deron and AK were great passers, but they tried some difficult passes and they TO the ball often.
There's less TO, but there's a lot of individual plays like Howard or Jefferson. So, less TO but less good shots. Our % is really bad.
In the other hand, Deron and AK were great passers, but they tried some difficult passes and they TO the ball often.

Re: why less turnovers?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,623
- And1: 430
- Joined: Jan 30, 2006
- Location: Sa'Lake Central!
-
Re: why less turnovers?
no d-will, no AK,
.
.
.
moar hugz!
.
.
.
moar hugz!
Re: why less turnovers?
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 18,794
- And1: 2,162
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-