Updates on players @ P3

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

retiredcoach
Pro Prospect
Posts: 858
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 29, 2011

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#21 » by retiredcoach » Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:47 pm

by AK47MVP on Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:56 am
Kosta had better stats then Kanter in U-18 Eurochampionship, he is taller, better leaper and outplayed Kanter head to head in few games I saw then against each other ( one in inernational game and two in NBA )... Why then Kanter should turn better then Koufos who is a scrub? Honestly, I do not see Kanter having any major impact in the future. Lack of lift and explosiveness is not easy to overcome unless you are great in pick and roll or pick and pop and can shoot from outside ( see Scola, Okur, Malone in his last few years of his career). Kanter should be focusing on his pick and roll and screen setting skills, not wasting time in PS3 as he will never be good leaper no matter what work you put into it.


Kanter didn't think up his training by himself. He's working on a program laid out by the Jazz coaches with the folks at P3. So he's doing what he's being asked to do. He also working on other aspects of his game beyond conditioning and strength.

Kanter is already twice the player Koufos is and Kanter is only 20 years old--three years younger than Koufos.
AK47MVP
Veteran
Posts: 2,541
And1: 1,650
Joined: Jul 30, 2012

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#22 » by AK47MVP » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:10 pm

retiredcoach wrote:Kanter is already twice the player Koufos is and Kanter is only 20 years old--three years younger than Koufos.


Well, that is simply not true. You may like him more then Kosta but judging by last years stats and head to head meetings Kosta is better.
AK47MVP
Veteran
Posts: 2,541
And1: 1,650
Joined: Jul 30, 2012

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#23 » by AK47MVP » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:13 pm

retiredcoach wrote:. He also working on other aspects of his game beyond conditioning and strength.
.


Him declining to play for Turkey in Euro qualifiers makes me think otherwise. What is better situation to improve your game then in real games? No pickup games or individual workouts will be the same as real games...not sure if it was Jazz who advised him not to play there or somebody else but that decision is beyond stupid.
retiredcoach
Pro Prospect
Posts: 858
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 29, 2011

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#24 » by retiredcoach » Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:48 am

by AK47MVP on Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:13 pm
Him declining to play for Turkey in Euro qualifiers makes me think otherwise. What is better situation to improve your game then in real games? No pickup games or individual workouts will be the same as real games...not sure if it was Jazz who advised him not to play there or somebody else but that decision is beyond stupid.


It's taken Koufos 6 years to be able to stay on the floor more than 10 minutes because of foul trouble. Koufos played high school basketball here, played AAU here and played a year of college ball and played on the national team. Over all he's got 10 years of experience on Kanter and he isn't as good.

Kanter made a smart decision not playing on the Turkish national team. The advice came from his parents, agent and Okur.

Of course you're smarter and know better than all of them.
reapaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,774
And1: 1,220
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
       

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#25 » by reapaman » Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:49 am

Its not that he shot 50% from the field that was abysmal in itself necause 50% is usually good. Take a close look at the numbers:

http://www.hoopdata.com/player.aspx?name=Enes%20Kanter

Look at him outside putbacks and dunks (at rim), he was very bad despite the low attempts and limit defensive attention. I mean blake griffin is widely considered to be limited offenively and he is way better than Kanter despite having way more defesnive attention. The point is with more defensive attention, usually your FG% doean't improve much or takes a huge hit ala how Favors and Hayward's dropped from their rookie season. So his 50% could easily be 46% or lower if he wasn't getting all those wide open and easy shots he got. I mean he was left wide open to score so many times is hillarious yet he couldn't not down many of those open shots. He can't shoot yet and is not athletic enough to score alot with little offensive moves ala dwight, so what is he gonna do. You can sit there say welll he's only 20 and hope he will get better soon but if you look at history, it takes about 5+ years before a guy develop true realible offensvie skills if they ever do. I mean next year and the year after he's gonna still suck very bad offensively and you know how quick fans and ever the FO can turn on a guy.

I would also like to point out that low post defense is probley the easist skill to learn and is almost irrelevant today due to the abudance of jump shooters and high post players. Saying Kanter is valuble because of his low post defense is laughable. I only care about his help defense, guarding guys man to man, defensive fundamentals and his overall team defensive skills. He is below average in all of those areas.

I could be wrong but he is just too raw and is not in the right situation for him too pan out. Also Bat had the nerve to name a scrub, two guys with unique natural defensive attributes but limited offensively, a guy with a very developed offensive game even at 19 y/o but is probley one of the worse defenders ever along with being mc donalds most loyal customer, and one of the most physically gifted players of all time. That list is far from encouraging for Kanter and he's nothing like any of those guys. BTW he did the right thing not playing for the turk national team. He should be no where near that punk *** coach. If he does pan out, I hope its not as Okur 2.0 which is what that guy wants him to be.
BRING JAMAAL FRANKLIN TO UTAH!!!!!
User avatar
The59Sound
Head Coach
Posts: 6,363
And1: 917
Joined: Jul 01, 2010
   

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#26 » by The59Sound » Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:26 pm

Kanter is a very good pick-and-roll defender, which IS hugely important in today's NBA.
R-DAWG wrote:Look guys, no matter what happens we know Fegan is a man of his word and Dwight Howard doesn't change his mind once he makes a decision.

The Quantifiable Connection: An Interstellar fan site.
http://www.quantifiableconnection.com
Deinonychus
Freshman
Posts: 79
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 01, 2012

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#27 » by Deinonychus » Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:27 pm

The59Sound wrote:Kanter is a very good pick-and-roll defender, which IS hugely important in today's NBA.


Was just about to say this. Or type this, I guess. Whatever.

Here's a link (I think this was posted earlier in the year):
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7599097/nba-rookie-rankings-vii-including-kyrie-irving-enes-kanter-ricky-rubio-more
User avatar
QuantumMacgyver
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,453
And1: 42
Joined: Jul 07, 2008

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#28 » by QuantumMacgyver » Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:34 pm

reapaman wrote:Its not that he shot 50% from the field that was abysmal in itself necause 50% is usually good. Take a close look at the numbers:

http://www.hoopdata.com/player.aspx?name=Enes%20Kanter

Look at him outside putbacks and dunks (at rim), he was very bad despite the low attempts and limit defensive attention. I mean blake griffin is widely considered to be limited offenively and he is way better than Kanter despite having way more defesnive attention. The point is with more defensive attention, usually your FG% doean't improve much or takes a huge hit ala how Favors and Hayward's dropped from their rookie season. So his 50% could easily be 46% or lower if he wasn't getting all those wide open and easy shots he got. I mean he was left wide open to score so many times is hillarious yet he couldn't not down many of those open shots. He can't shoot yet and is not athletic enough to score alot with little offensive moves ala dwight, so what is he gonna do. You can sit there say welll he's only 20 and hope he will get better soon but if you look at history, it takes about 5+ years before a guy develop true realible offensvie skills if they ever do. I mean next year and the year after he's gonna still suck very bad offensively and you know how quick fans and ever the FO can turn on a guy.

I would also like to point out that low post defense is probley the easist skill to learn and is almost irrelevant today due to the abudance of jump shooters and high post players. Saying Kanter is valuble because of his low post defense is laughable. I only care about his help defense, guarding guys man to man, defensive fundamentals and his overall team defensive skills. He is below average in all of those areas.

I could be wrong but he is just too raw and is not in the right situation for him too pan out. Also Bat had the nerve to name a scrub, two guys with unique natural defensive attributes but limited offensively, a guy with a very developed offensive game even at 19 y/o but is probley one of the worse defenders ever along with being mc donalds most loyal customer, and one of the most physically gifted players of all time. That list is far from encouraging for Kanter and he's nothing like any of those guys. BTW he did the right thing not playing for the turk national team. He should be no where near that punk *** coach. If he does pan out, I hope its not as Okur 2.0 which is what that guy wants him to be.


This is seriously annoying. You keep spouting this BS about history proving it takes "5+ years before a guy develop true realible offensvie skills". If you insist on using this fallacious statistic PLEASE find something to back it up, because it is just plain bull****! And honestly crap like that doesn't belong here. In fact I'll make it easy on you...

Brook Lopez
Al Jefferson
DeMarcus Cousins
Kevin Garnett
Greg Monroe
Al Horford
Emeka Okafor
Mehmet Okur
Marcus Camby

NONE of these centers took "5+ years". Almost everyone one of them had it figured out and was putting up 15ppg by year three. Now, I know it might look like I simply gathered up the best scoring centers in the league to skew the facts a bit. Nearly every other center in the league either hasn't played five years yet, played overseas first, or NEVER developed "true reliable offensive skills". That's right, not only is your 5+ years stat not accurate it is ABSOLUTELY, 100%, UNDENIABLY the complete opposite of the truth. In fact, history proves that if a center doesn't develop offensive skills WITHIN their first five years, then they NEVER do.

Oh, unless your 5+ years theory is based purely off of Jermaine O'neal. (The ONLY center in the league that took 5+ years to develop "true reliable offensive skills".)
AK47MVP
Veteran
Posts: 2,541
And1: 1,650
Joined: Jul 30, 2012

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#29 » by AK47MVP » Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:28 pm

retiredcoach wrote:
It's taken Koufos 6 years to be able to stay on the floor more than 10 minutes because of foul trouble. Koufos played high school basketball here, played AAU here and played a year of college ball and played on the national team. Over all he's got 10 years of experience on Kanter and he isn't as good.


That is simply not true. Both Koufos and Kanter played about the same amount of time before NCAA. Both participated in U-18 Eurochampionship where Kosta posted most dominant numbers in tournament history. Kanter missed year of NCAA basketball - another stupid decision on his own choice, so whatever. So yes, Koufos has 1 year NCAA experience for him and 3 more years of limited NBA experience. That equals to 4 years, not 10. And where are you getting 6 years and foul trouble claim? Out of your a.. I guess :lol:
And you claiming he isn't as good as Kanter? Again - it is your biased opinion, stats and numbers show different picture.
retiredcoach
Pro Prospect
Posts: 858
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 29, 2011

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#30 » by retiredcoach » Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:04 pm

by AK47MVP on Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:28 am

That is simply not true. Both Koufos and Kanter played about the same amount of time before NCAA. Both participated in U-18 Eurochampionship where Kosta posted most dominant numbers in tournament history. Kanter missed year of NCAA basketball - another stupid decision on his own choice, so whatever. So yes, Koufos has 1 year NCAA experience for him and 3 more years of limited NBA experience. That equals to 4 years, not 10. And where are you getting 6 years and foul trouble claim? Out of your a.. I guess :lol:
And you claiming he isn't as good as Kanter? Again - it is your biased opinion, stats and numbers show different picture.


I don't need to pull anything out of my ass. I spent 30 years in this game. Just because you don't know what you're talking doesn't mean I don't.

In ten years, the verdict will be in. The stats will be clear. If you're right, then you can tell me how smart you are and how I was talking out of my ass, etc. Until then all you've got is an opinion not backed up by experience, unless you count watching games on television as experience.
reapaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,774
And1: 1,220
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
       

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#31 » by reapaman » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:19 am

QuantumMacgyver wrote:
This is seriously annoying. You keep spouting this BS about history proving it takes "5+ years before a guy develop true realible offensvie skills". If you insist on using this fallacious statistic PLEASE find something to back it up, because it is just plain bull****! And honestly crap like that doesn't belong here. In fact I'll make it easy on you...

Brook Lopez
Al Jefferson
DeMarcus Cousins
Kevin Garnett
Greg Monroe
Al Horford
Emeka Okafor
Mehmet Okur
Marcus Camby

NONE of these centers took "5+ years". Almost everyone one of them had it figured out and was putting up 15ppg by year three. Now, I know it might look like I simply gathered up the best scoring centers in the league to skew the facts a bit. Nearly every other center in the league either hasn't played five years yet, played overseas first, or NEVER developed "true reliable offensive skills". That's right, not only is your 5+ years stat not accurate it is ABSOLUTELY, 100%, UNDENIABLY the complete opposite of the truth. In fact, history proves that if a center doesn't develop offensive skills WITHIN their first five years, then they NEVER do.

Oh, unless your 5+ years theory is based purely off of Jermaine O'neal. (The ONLY center in the league that took 5+ years to develop "true reliable offensive skills".)

People please if you gonna respond to someone, please read and not just glance at what they read. Also make sure you comprehend it and then if you have an aurgument take your time to make sure it applies to the situation and that it makes sense. Quantum did none of thease clearly.

All those guys you names scored in the NBA like they did at the previous level (high school, college, or internationally) with the exception of some minor adjustments. The way they scored at those levels works in the NBA for the most part although some tweaks like arching your shot a little more needs to be made and getting more comfortable against better competition. Garnett used his elite athletism to create physical matches against other big man along with a nice jump shot in high school, and he did the same thing in the NBA. Later he developed more skills such as that high turn around jumper he does so well but that was years later. For the most part Horford uses the same post moves and mid range game he had in college and add some new ones recently although he's still to stiff. Jefferson still spins/falls away from contact when he scoring in the post but he has added a couple high post moves later in his career and his jump shot is wetter of course. Dwight used his elite athletism to score in both level and despite years of hard work even with Ewing (who had strong mid range skills) it wasn't until about 2 years ago did he really expand his game. Demarcus does the same stuff for the most part, So on and so forth.

The point is that you can still score a lot early in your career as long as what you do best works. How Kanter scored for the most part in the youth league which was basically out muscling guys and shooting over them does not work in the nba. He does tip in and dunk well when the defense isn't really trying to hard on him which is basic but you can only get so many of them per game and I dought you can be a consistent double point guy off of that effeciently anyway. He has to find another way to score. Some of the post moves Garnett has now like the high turn around jumper, he didn't have those till around his prime but he still has the skills to score without them; they just made him more versitile. To develop new ways to score takes a long time. You can even use the biyombo - thabeet debate as an example. Many on this board grilled me when I said Biyombo will be a good shot blocker year one and many said he will struggle to block ala thabeet. The haters didn't take into account that the way those two guys block are completely different from each other. Well needless to say he was one of the top shot blockers in the nba. Why is that .... because how he block works in the nba and thabeets doesn't Thabeets gonna have to learn how to actually move to block shots instead of camping in the middle. Also derrick rose works as hard as anyone on his jump shot and its getting better but its still far from reliable when he really needs it which is clutch time in the post season.

So if you disagree and believe Kanter has nba acceptable offensive skils right now then thats fine but don't say I'm wrong about it taking a long time to develop new skills because it does. BTW how many times have I mentioned Jermaine O'neil in an argument? I've been saying the same things for over a year and his name only been mention once by me in reference to Kanter and thats only because Euradite brought it up.
BRING JAMAAL FRANKLIN TO UTAH!!!!!
retiredcoach
Pro Prospect
Posts: 858
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 29, 2011

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#32 » by retiredcoach » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:30 am

Man!

Image


Boy

Image
reapaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,774
And1: 1,220
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
       

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#33 » by reapaman » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:39 am

The59Sound wrote:Kanter is a very good pick-and-roll defender, which IS hugely important in today's NBA.

I strongly disgree. I constantly see him letting the "roller" get an open shot when he should have picked him up or close out late when trapping the player with ball among other things. Just my opinion. By the way to the guy using the article that used synergy stats, they got Big Al ranked #52 for P and R defenders which is top 13% in the nba. So either Al is a beast defensively or Synergy sucks.

http://c296307.r7.cf1.rackcdn.com/lockedonjazz/files/2012/05/al-jefferson-defense-synergy.png
BRING JAMAAL FRANKLIN TO UTAH!!!!!
User avatar
QuantumMacgyver
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,453
And1: 42
Joined: Jul 07, 2008

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#34 » by QuantumMacgyver » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:49 am

People please if you gonna respond to someone responding to you please put something in your response that has something to do with the previous response.

You said it takes players 5+ years to develop, and I quote "true realible offensvie skills'. If a player is averaging 15+ points a night, I would say they have some "true realible offensvie skills". And if you had read my response, which you obviously didn't, you would've seen the note in the parenthesis explaining EXACTLY why I mentioned Jermaine O'Neal... because he is the ONLY center in league to take 5+ years to develop reliable offensive skills. Everyone else either developed them earlier than 5 years, or never developed them at all.

P.S. You still have yet to show any type of proof to support your ludicrous 5+ years theory. It doesn't take players 5+ years to develop true offensive reliable skills. You should change the bogus 5+ years BS to something like "the difference between GOOD players and GREAT players is that GREAT players find ways to ADD ADDITIONAL skills to their skillset beyond their first five years". That makes total sense.

And the claim that all those centers scored in the NBA the same way they scored at previous levels is ridiculous. If that were the case then everyone of them would've come into the league scoring 15+ a night. However, most didn't do it until, guess what, their THIRD season! Which might lead one to believe that most big men develop reliable offensive skills after 3+ years, not 5+. If you want to stick with the insane 5+ years theory, just please find examples to back it up. Find players who didn't have any reliable offensive skills before their fifth year and then had them after. I'll make it easy for ya again. I went out and found the example for you. His name is Jermaine O'Neal... and he is the only one in the league.
User avatar
QuantumMacgyver
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,453
And1: 42
Joined: Jul 07, 2008

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#35 » by QuantumMacgyver » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:54 am

retiredcoach wrote:No twinkie's diet for Kanter!

Image


Where'd you find this RC? I google "Big Enes stretching on back while woman watches", and I found something VERY different!!! :o
retiredcoach
Pro Prospect
Posts: 858
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 29, 2011

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#36 » by retiredcoach » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:59 am

by QuantumMacgyver on Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:54 pm

Where'd you find this RC? I google "Big Enes stretching on back while woman watches", and I found something VERY different!!! :o


QM Post It!

Let's see what he does during those workouts!
AK47MVP
Veteran
Posts: 2,541
And1: 1,650
Joined: Jul 30, 2012

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#37 » by AK47MVP » Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:08 am

retiredcoach wrote: I don't need to pull anything out of my ass. I spent 30 years in this game. Just because you don't know what you're talking doesn't mean I don't.

In ten years, the verdict will be in. The stats will be clear. If you're right, then you can tell me how smart you are and how I was talking out of my ass, etc. Until then all you've got is an opinion not backed up by experience, unless you count watching games on television as experience.


So you admit that you made up numbers which tells you that Kanter is twice as good as Koufos ...ROFL.
Dude, I back up my post by stats. They tell different storry then your "experience". If you want to claim based on your experience that in 10 years Kanter will have better NBA career then Koufos - thats fine, that can happen. But please, do not post your biased opinion not supported by any stats, data or numbers as fact. It is only your opinion/prediction based on "30 years in this game".
By the way I am in this game more then 30 years FYI. Just friendly fact for you.
reapaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,774
And1: 1,220
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
       

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#38 » by reapaman » Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:20 am

QuantumMacgyver wrote:People please if you gonna respond to someone responding to you please put something in your response that has something to do with the previous response.

You said it takes players 5+ years to develop, and I quote "true realible offensvie skills'. If a player is averaging 15+ points a night, I would say they have some "true realible offensvie skills". And if you had read my response, which you obviously didn't, you would've seen the note in the parenthesis explaining EXACTLY why I mentioned Jermaine O'Neal... because he is the ONLY center in league to take 5+ years to develop reliable offensive skills. Everyone else either developed them earlier than 5 years, or never developed them at all.

P.S. You still have yet to show any type of proof to support your ludicrous 5+ years theory. It doesn't take players 5+ years to develop true offensive reliable skills. You should change the bogus 5+ years BS to something like "the difference between GOOD players and GREAT players is that GREAT players find ways to ADD ADDITIONAL skills to their skillset beyond their first five years". That makes total sense.

And the claim that all those centers scored in the NBA the same way they scored at previous levels is ridiculous. If that were the case then everyone of them would've come into the league scoring 15+ a night. However, most didn't do it until, guess what, their THIRD season! Which might lead one to believe that most big men develop reliable offensive skills after 3+ years, not 5+. If you want to stick with the insane 5+ years theory, just please find examples to back it up. Find players who didn't have any reliable offensive skills before their fifth year and then had them after. I'll make it easy for ya again. I went out and found the example for you. His name is Jermaine O'Neal... and he is the only one in the league.

Yes thats exactly what I said. I never said you can't come into the league with one like elite athletism ala dwight or Big Al's post moves they both came into the NBA with. Iv'e been saying this for over a year now. When a guy gets to the NBA, for whatever reason when a guy is trying to develop a skill like post moves or a jump shot, it takes the about 5+ years for it to become relaible. Dwight has tried his hardest to learn post skill and even had Ewing helping him yet it took him 5 - 6 years (for some reason its a debate on when he greatly expanded his offensive game) to really extend beyond put back, dunks and that weak unrealiable hook shot he had. Griffin has been trying to expand his game and its coming on very slowly, in about a few more years then you may see a huge difference. Rose and James try their hardest to become better shooters and they still got a ways to go. Took Garnett about 5+ years to get those turn around jumpers and other post moves he tryed hard to develop. Took even the great MJ forever to develop his shot mainly the 3 point shot. Mabey its because he was hurt alot which stunted his growth but it took about 5 years for Bynums post moves to really come realible and he still has some work to do based on last season's playoffs. It took Big Al like 8 -9 years to learn how to pass the ball (ok that was a joke .... kinda). So on and so forth.

Don't put words in my mouth. I know exactly what I'm saying. Kanter has zero true realible offensive skills and its gonna take him 5+ years to develop one. And to your point about guys coming into the league as 15+ scorer and not till yer 3. Most of those guys just don't get the mintues or oppurtunties to do it due to a variety of reasons. But the main reason is like I said, most gotta make minor adjustments to their games and get used to the increased level of play. That could take a couple or so sure, but not much longer. The point I was making for the last year is that its not gonna be 2 or 3 (this was before he got drafted) for him to really come together offensively ala someone like garnett, its gonna be like 5-7 years at the least if ever. Theres a different between adjusting a skill youve been doing on a consistent basis during pre-NBA time to fit the NBA level versus learning a new skill from that you haven't been doing on a consistent basis during your pre-NBA time. And just to make sure we are on the same page, a reliable skill could be anything like eltie athletism (can't learn that), a post move (high or low), a jump shot, slashing to the basket, ect...

BTW Jermaine oneil didn't take 5 years to develop. If you saw him in Portland, it was injuries and a lot of verteran front court guys ahead of him that took playing time from him. He really didn't do much different by the time he got to Indiana, he just got more shots and playing time thats all.
BRING JAMAAL FRANKLIN TO UTAH!!!!!
ack
Freshman
Posts: 73
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 20, 2012

Re: Updates on players @ P3 

Post#39 » by ack » Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:50 am

He can shoot damn he can shoot but they dont let him shoot!

Return to Utah Jazz