Inigo Montoya wrote:Let's say we do find a Gobert 2.0. But what would be the point? Gobert 1.0 was exposed in the playoffs and over the years was shown to be unplayable against certain lineups. Getting another player like Gobert isn't the answer, we'll just get the same results we've been getting so far. It's not like when we played the Clippers we were saying that we really need another player like Gobert so we could play the same way when OG Gobert was on the bench.
Just looking for another player like Gobert is lazy (from a FO\coaching perspective). You can build a good defensive team without Gobert--other teams in the league are doing it every year. It's just that Snyder is too lazy or inept to implement a good defensive system that isn't reliant on Gobert. He's been riding Gobert's inhuman defensive abilities for years.
I wouldn't say Gobert gets exposed in the playoffs. I would say our system gets exposed in the playoffs because the opponents target pretty much anybody but Gobert to initiate their offense... and Quin has a ton to answer for for that. Gobert still can be a great defensive player in the playoffs... as long as he has any modicum of support from the rest of the roster.
But overall I agree. We don't need more of the same since other teams have shown that they can exploit the same we already have. We need versatility and we need different ways to defend and attack. We need to be able to actually counter what other teams are planning against us, rather than hoping Gobert 1.0 and Gobert 2.0 will be good enough to cover the corner 3, then help at the rim, then recover to the 3, then go get the rebound... because noone else on the team is supposed to play any defense.