The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad.

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

User avatar
FJS
Senior Mod - Jazz
Senior Mod - Jazz
Posts: 18,807
And1: 2,174
Joined: Sep 19, 2002
Location: Barcelona, Spain
   

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#21 » by FJS » Fri Nov 1, 2024 11:14 am

Well... yes, we are that bad.
Image
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,146
And1: 8,422
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#22 » by Inigo Montoya » Fri Nov 1, 2024 12:01 pm

Yeah, we can lock this thread :)
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
TNJazz
Rookie
Posts: 1,117
And1: 490
Joined: Jan 07, 2017
     

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#23 » by TNJazz » Fri Nov 1, 2024 2:26 pm

Only winless team in the league, I think we are that bad...
WinterSoldier
Senior
Posts: 572
And1: 260
Joined: Mar 28, 2015
 

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#24 » by WinterSoldier » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:09 pm

We're bad, but also I think the Wolves might also be worse this year than they were last year.
User avatar
FJS
Senior Mod - Jazz
Senior Mod - Jazz
Posts: 18,807
And1: 2,174
Joined: Sep 19, 2002
Location: Barcelona, Spain
   

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#25 » by FJS » Sat Nov 2, 2024 9:17 am

After Stockton and Malone we were able to sign Boozer & Okur and Draft Williams.
After Sloan left and traded Williams, (With Hayward already drafted) we were able to take Favors, draft Kanter, Burks and later Gobert. Those young guys were much more promising than those one. We already had Milsap and we traded for Jefferson.
Once Hayward left, we have an instant star in Mitchell.
We traded Gobert & Mitchell, and although the team looked poor, they were good enough to make playoffs... but we destroyed them.
Last year more or less the same.
I hope it's worthy, because Hendricks, Keyonte, Williams, Sensabaugh don't look worthy at all. Flip and Collier I'm not sure. We had some young guys (or at least not too old) like Fontecchio, Vanderbilt, Agbaji to name a few playing better than those guys. Plus we gifted some veterans like Olynyk, Conley or Beasley who were much better than those youngs.
Only time will tell, but our own picks (Hendricks and Williams) doesn't look great. Hendricks (injury aside) looks like vanderbilt, and Williams right now doesn't look an nba player.
Only time will tell.
Image
User avatar
MalonesElbows
Starter
Posts: 2,437
And1: 1,494
Joined: Sep 14, 2009
     

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#26 » by MalonesElbows » Sun Nov 3, 2024 1:19 pm

FJS wrote:After Stockton and Malone we were able to sign Boozer & Okur and Draft Williams.
After Sloan left and traded Williams, (With Hayward already drafted) we were able to take Favors, draft Kanter, Burks and later Gobert. Those young guys were much more promising than those one. We already had Milsap and we traded for Jefferson.
Once Hayward left, we have an instant star in Mitchell.
We traded Gobert & Mitchell, and although the team looked poor, they were good enough to make playoffs... but we destroyed them.
Last year more or less the same.
I hope it's worthy, because Hendricks, Keyonte, Williams, Sensabaugh don't look worthy at all. Flip and Collier I'm not sure. We had some young guys (or at least not too old) like Fontecchio, Vanderbilt, Agbaji to name a few playing better than those guys. Plus we gifted some veterans like Olynyk, Conley or Beasley who were much better than those youngs.
Only time will tell, but our own picks (Hendricks and Williams) doesn't look great. Hendricks (injury aside) looks like vanderbilt, and Williams right now doesn't look an nba player.
Only time will tell.


I know the draft is a crap shoot, but if Hendricks, Williams, and George all bust it doesn't speak well for management and our scouts.
WinterSoldier
Senior
Posts: 572
And1: 260
Joined: Mar 28, 2015
 

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#27 » by WinterSoldier » Sun Nov 3, 2024 7:46 pm

MalonesElbows wrote:
FJS wrote:After Stockton and Malone we were able to sign Boozer & Okur and Draft Williams.
After Sloan left and traded Williams, (With Hayward already drafted) we were able to take Favors, draft Kanter, Burks and later Gobert. Those young guys were much more promising than those one. We already had Milsap and we traded for Jefferson.
Once Hayward left, we have an instant star in Mitchell.
We traded Gobert & Mitchell, and although the team looked poor, they were good enough to make playoffs... but we destroyed them.
Last year more or less the same.
I hope it's worthy, because Hendricks, Keyonte, Williams, Sensabaugh don't look worthy at all. Flip and Collier I'm not sure. We had some young guys (or at least not too old) like Fontecchio, Vanderbilt, Agbaji to name a few playing better than those guys. Plus we gifted some veterans like Olynyk, Conley or Beasley who were much better than those youngs.
Only time will tell, but our own picks (Hendricks and Williams) doesn't look great. Hendricks (injury aside) looks like vanderbilt, and Williams right now doesn't look an nba player.
Only time will tell.


I know the draft is a crap shoot, but if Hendricks, Williams, and George all bust it doesn't speak well for management and our scouts.


They really aren't meant to be stars they were drafted in the supplemental range of the draft. This year and next year drafts is where we need to draft stars. If Hendricks, Williams, and George can become useful role players or added value in a trade then they've been useful assets IMO.
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,634
And1: 3,068
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#28 » by Daddy 801 » Mon Nov 4, 2024 5:18 am

Everything looks on tract to me. Hendricks going down really blows. But the rooks will get even more playing time. So that’s a positive out a giant negative. We need to be this bad for two years to fully tank correctly.

Buckle up for a couple terrible years.
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,919
And1: 3,004
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#29 » by tugs » Thu Nov 7, 2024 7:50 am

Collier debut incoming?
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,146
And1: 8,422
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#30 » by Inigo Montoya » Thu Nov 7, 2024 1:37 pm

tugs wrote:Collier debut incoming?

Could be. Until now he was injured but now he's listed as GTD. I'm curious to see if he's a good floor general who can run a team.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,637
And1: 795
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#31 » by bkohler » Thu Nov 7, 2024 11:18 pm

Daddy 801 wrote:

Buckle up for a couple terrible years.


I'd be wiling to bet we're in the bottom 5 for the next three years, two of them on purpose and the third by accident.
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,634
And1: 3,068
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#32 » by Daddy 801 » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:34 am

bkohler wrote:
Daddy 801 wrote:

Buckle up for a couple terrible years.


I'd be wiling to bet we're in the bottom 5 for the next three years, two of them on purpose and the third by accident.


Could happen. That’s the potential price we pay to take the risk to really tank and get good picks. Or we could be like OKC where we jump to a great team with a ton of youth. But the only path to a potential championship team is tanking and I am all for it.
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,919
And1: 3,004
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#33 » by tugs » Mon Nov 11, 2024 1:56 am

Man Jazz is too good to tank, and not too competitive to make some noise.

Just play the youth, Coach Hardy. Washington is doing it right
User avatar
Cappy_Smurf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,322
And1: 9,809
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
     

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#34 » by Cappy_Smurf » Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:10 am

bkohler wrote:
Daddy 801 wrote:

Buckle up for a couple terrible years.


I'd be wiling to bet we're in the bottom 5 for the next three years, two of them on purpose and the third by accident.



These are best case scenarios. It's more likely we'll be bad for 5+ years. Even if you draft future all-stars in the next 2 drafts, most players take a few years to develop. Wemby is the most hyped player in years, and he is nowhere close to dominating in his 2nd year. It's also just as easy to draft the next Ayton, Wiseman, Scoot, etc. The draft is ABSOLUTELY a crap shoot. Assuming we will draft 2 MVPs who will immediately be taking us to the playoffs in their 1st, 2nd year is a pipe dream.

Nothing wrong with dreaming I guess. My dream is that we draft Flagg and then trade picks for a star level player to make a big 3 of Lauri/Flagg/3rd star. Is this scenario we are back to competing next year. :)
New York said Mitchell wasn't the guy you trade the sink for, then they traded it for Mikal, lol.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,513
And1: 17,978
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#35 » by babyjax13 » Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:21 pm

wish we'd have drafted Kyshawn George like I was desperate for lol. Other than Keyonte who I liked a lot (and has been abysmal interspersed with short, great stretches) the team has drafted guys that I just really don't love as prospects. But then, I've always hated Danny's drafting and he has multiple championships. Hopefully the trust is justified. I don't mind losing a ton and collecting picks, at least we have a direction, but we should have picked it a year and a half ago when we could have gotten 3-4 1sts for Lauri and started tanking.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,572
And1: 11,159
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#36 » by Catchall » Tue Nov 12, 2024 1:49 am

babyjax13 wrote:wish we'd have drafted Kyshawn George like I was desperate for lol. Other than Keyonte who I liked a lot (and has been abysmal interspersed with short, great stretches) the team has drafted guys that I just really don't love as prospects. But then, I've always hated Danny's drafting and he has multiple championships. Hopefully the trust is justified. I don't mind losing a ton and collecting picks, at least we have a direction, but we should have picked it a year and a half ago when we could have gotten 3-4 1sts for Lauri and started tanking.


There were players in the mid-1st round, like George, Ware, Carrington, etc., that were going to be nice picks. The Jazz didn't have a pick in that range. I still like the Cody Williams pick, but he needs a lot of development to fulfill his potential. If the Jazz weren't tanking, Cody likely wouldn't be getting minutes and would be sent to the Gleague.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,513
And1: 17,978
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#37 » by babyjax13 » Tue Nov 12, 2024 3:12 am

Catchall wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:wish we'd have drafted Kyshawn George like I was desperate for lol. Other than Keyonte who I liked a lot (and has been abysmal interspersed with short, great stretches) the team has drafted guys that I just really don't love as prospects. But then, I've always hated Danny's drafting and he has multiple championships. Hopefully the trust is justified. I don't mind losing a ton and collecting picks, at least we have a direction, but we should have picked it a year and a half ago when we could have gotten 3-4 1sts for Lauri and started tanking.


There were players in the mid-1st round, like George, Ware, Carrington, etc., that were going to be nice picks. The Jazz didn't have a pick in that range. I still like the Cody Williams pick, but he needs a lot of development to fulfill his potential. If the Jazz weren't tanking, Cody likely wouldn't be getting minutes and would be sent to the Gleague.

I had Kyshawn George #2 on my board, so I would have picked him over Williams - don't mind Cody, though, just not completely enamored.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,146
And1: 8,422
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: The Jazz have a problem: They're not that bad. 

Post#38 » by Inigo Montoya » Tue Nov 12, 2024 9:47 am

So far it's been a really bad draft as a whole. Not a lot of players to be excited about. It looks like Flip might actually turn out to be one of the better players in this draft.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.

Return to Utah Jazz