Bucks @ Jazz

The Sheik · Post #21 » by **The Sheik** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:41 am

Jarron Collins :banghead:

Pai Gow · Post #22 » by **Pai Gow** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:46 am

The Sheik wrote:LOL @ Carmelo losing the game for the nuggets..hehe

What did he do?

xstockholmsyndromex · Post #23 » by **xstockholmsyndromex** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:55 am

The Sheik wrote:LOL @ Carmelo losing the game for the nuggets..hehe

I missed it, what happened??

@ndrew · Post #24 » by **@ndrew** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:56 am

115-117
He made first FT, missed the second, made an O, and they traveled with the ball =)

xstockholmsyndromex · Post #25 » by **xstockholmsyndromex** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:04 am

WHAT A PLAY!!!

The Sheik · Post #26 » by **The Sheik** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:07 am

AKsWill wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

What did he do?

He missed the game tying FT..got tapped an offensive rebound and then traveled.

xstockholmsyndromex · Post #27 » by **xstockholmsyndromex** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:07 am

We really should be up by more than 1. Both teams are shooting ridiculously well. Rebounds are what are keeping the Bucks in this, and rebounds could be what cost the Jazz this game. They need to pund the boards in the second half!

Neon Black · Post #28 » by **Neon Black** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:08 am

I wish just for once that I could watch a nice play without hearing that it JUST MIGHT BE THE MORGAN JEWELLER DIAMOND play of the game!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

it's getting so annoying

KZ · Post #29 » by KZ » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:09 am

wow, the bullets appear to be the celtic's kryptonite :clap:

The Sheik · Post #30 » by **The Sheik** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:10 am

Well Boozer is averaging 6.6 rpg this month which is totally unacceptable. He needs to hit the boards.

xstockholmsyndromex · Post #31 » by **xstockholmsyndromex** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:11 am

KZ wrote:wow, the bullets appear to be the celtic's kryptonite

You mean the Wizards!?!?

I havent heard them called the Bullets in a long time.....which is a better fitting name for a team coming out of DC!

Neon Black · Post #32 » by **Neon Black** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:11 am

@ndrew wrote:115-117
He made first FT, missed the second, made an O, and they traveled with the ball =)

I can't believe this guy gets so many all-star votes over clearly superior players...he scores alot and has corn rows/shoe commercials. A marketable image, but an overrated player. I guarantee Denver never gets a championship with him or AI.

The Sheik · Post #33 » by **The Sheik** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:11 am

ele.ven wrote:I wish just for once that I could watch a nice play without hearing that it JUST MIGHT BE THE MORGAN JEWELLER DIAMOND play of the game!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

it's getting so annoying

Except that one probably is...

xstockholmsyndromex · Post #34 » by **xstockholmsyndromex** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:12 am

The Sheik wrote:Well Boozer is averaging 6.6 rpg this month which is totally unacceptable. He needs to hit the boards.

I remember when Boozer was an automatic double double...I cant remember the last time he got 10 rebounds!

We also need to get Memo more involved in this game. When he does well, we do well!

Neon Black · Post #35 » by **Neon Black** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:15 am

xstockholmsyndromex wrote:We really should be up by more than 1.

The 2 major Jazz downfalls:

1. stupid turnovers
2. defense

If they could fix defense, they could afford the turnovers. If they didn't turn it over, their defense wouldn't suffer as much. They need to at least fix ONE of these, or they're going to keep having close game after close game no matter how well they score.

Cold Crush 24 · Post #36 » by **Cold Crush 24** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:17 am

I wouldnt be too concearned. We (the Bucks) make some decent runs but we cant close a game to save our lives. Chalk up a Jazz W.

Neon Black · Post #37 » by **Neon Black** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:17 am

The Sheik wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Except that one probably is...

Sure, it probably is. But can't they just say that it might be the "play of the game" until they actually present it and have to say it? Plus it doesn't do anything to constantly try to call it all game, let the **** plays speak for themselves.

The Sheik · Post #38 » by **The Sheik** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:19 am

ele.ven wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Sure, it probably is. But can't they just say that it might be the "play of the game.

Hell no...its Craig effin Bolerjack...what do you expect?

The Sheik · Post #39 » by **The Sheik** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:38 am

Jason Hart to the rescue

The Sheik · Post #40 » by **The Sheik** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:39 am

LMAO at Boozer getting dunked on by Bogs