The Preseason Thread

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

dautjazz
RealGM
Posts: 15,278
And1: 10,044
Joined: Aug 01, 2001
Location: Miami, FL
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#221 » by dautjazz » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:56 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
Stern Fixer wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:That's as good a game as I've seen Exum play since he entered the league, hopefully it's a sign of good things to come.

Three's accounted for half his field goals his rookie year, and in that game he didn't make one - in fact, he only had 1 jumper at all, that little mid-range one. He's made great progress in terms of being aggressive and utlizing his tools, and while he's got a while to go to show that will be consistent, I don't think I've really seen the flashes as well as I have that game. His handle looks better too.

I'll admit, I was worried that Exum was going to underwhelm - he was just so raw coming out. I'm starting to see the sort of potential that can really turn him in to a pivotal player though.


My thoughts exactly. As you say, he was raw and struggled in his first year. Had one of the worst +- that year of any guard, but he always had a knack for defense. And he was young so in that sense we always had hope. Not his fault having been drafted out of high school and not in the American system either (which is much more rigorous). Did cross my mind though, did we make a mistake taking this green kid at #5. Nothing but raw potential. But it was an incredibly week draft so we had that to fall back on. It was a total crap shoot, one that now in retrospect looks ready to pay off with a long and prosperous run. :nod:


Don't think it was a weak draft, still value after Exum but he will defintiely be top 10 in this draft.
1. Wiggins
2. Parker
3. Embiid
4. Gordon
5. Exum
6. Smart
7. Randle
13. LaVine
16. Nurkic
19. Harris
25. Capela
41. Jokic
45. Powell
46. Clarkson


You forgot Hood? I would say he's currently the second or third best player of the bunch. With Wiggins currently leading the pack, then it's Parker or Hood. Obviously Embiid should be in the mix if he stays healthy.
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.

by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53

im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.
JazzMan_OS
Sophomore
Posts: 219
And1: 135
Joined: Jul 27, 2016

Re: RE: Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#222 » by JazzMan_OS » Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:17 pm

stitches wrote:Hood is no. 1 by win shares from that draft.

Looking back at that draft, we killed it. Nabbed the 2nd best player in the draft (by the end of the year, he could be #1 ) and we got one of the biggest upsides in that draft in Exum, who looks very, very promising right now on both ends.

Best draft we could have hoped for.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,621
And1: 43,867
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#223 » by zimpy27 » Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:20 pm

dautjazz wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
Stern Fixer wrote:
My thoughts exactly. As you say, he was raw and struggled in his first year. Had one of the worst +- that year of any guard, but he always had a knack for defense. And he was young so in that sense we always had hope. Not his fault having been drafted out of high school and not in the American system either (which is much more rigorous). Did cross my mind though, did we make a mistake taking this green kid at #5. Nothing but raw potential. But it was an incredibly week draft so we had that to fall back on. It was a total crap shoot, one that now in retrospect looks ready to pay off with a long and prosperous run. :nod:


Don't think it was a weak draft, still value after Exum but he will defintiely be top 10 in this draft.
1. Wiggins
2. Parker
3. Embiid
4. Gordon
5. Exum
6. Smart
7. Randle
13. LaVine
16. Nurkic
19. Harris
25. Capela
41. Jokic
45. Powell
46. Clarkson


You forgot Hood? I would say he's currently the second or third best player of the bunch. With Wiggins currently leading the pack, then it's Parker or Hood. Obviously Embiid should be in the mix if he stays healthy.


I didn't include him because he was Jazz and was more making example of who after Exum was value that could've been chosen instead and to date have been better than him.

But yeah Hood would be there too though I rate Jokic the best from this draft. Jokic, Nurkic, Embiid, Wiggins, Parker I'd probably take over Hood right now.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,078
And1: 8,360
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#224 » by Inigo Montoya » Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:59 pm

I watched the first half and saw the Jazz destroy the Suns and thought the game was over. Now I find out we managed to lose after leading by around 30? Can someone explain what the hell happened?

A few takeaways:
1. Love the new court--the color scheme is real nice.
2. Love Exum's drives, it is nice to see him attack and getting good results.
3. I thought the Suns were horrible and they'll have a tough season. How in Hades did they win this?
4. Not all teams will foul like the Suns, but it's good to see Gobert hitting FT's. Hopefully it will carry on throughout the season.
5. The improved passing by guys like Diaw, Exum and Hill will help Gobert and Favors get some easy points, finally.
6. The lingering issue of getting scored on with very little time on the clock persists from last season. Even in the first half, the Suns managed to score on us with 3 seconds to go, after inbounding from under their own basket after Jazz free throws. Super frustrating to see we still have this issue.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#225 » by stitches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:09 pm

Inigo Montoya wrote:I watched the first half and saw the Jazz destroy the Suns and thought the game was over. Now I find out we managed to lose after leading by around 30? Can someone explain what the hell happened?

A few takeaways:
1. Love the new court--the color scheme is real nice.


Same! New court is sweet! The only thing is - the white outline kind of merge with the lighter inside color. Which is not a huge deal, but I wonder if refs will have harder time noticing people stepping out of bounds.
Inigo Montoya wrote:2. Love Exum's drives, it is nice to see him attack and getting good results.

This was all I wanted from Exum when I had my rant after game 1. I wanted him to just try it. The thing with him is - he's FAST! Even if he's not a great finisher the fact that he's fast and long will mean that he will get fouled a ton by people trying to catch up with him. I loved it. And he even had some sweet in and out dribbles. Blew past Booker numerous times, Bledsoe, the Brazilian blur. And he even scored on some of those drives. Even dropped a pullup jumper... AND A FLOATER! This game was pretty much how I envision him playing. He showed everything I think will make him a successful player.
Inigo Montoya wrote:3. I thought the Suns were horrible and they'll have a tough season. How in Hades did they win this?

Marcus Paige, Henry Sims, Quincy Ford and Eric Dawson. Also, tons of fouls.
Inigo Montoya wrote:4. Not all teams will foul like the Suns, but it's good to see Gobert hitting FT's. Hopefully it will carry on throughout the season.

I'm still not sure this is a long-term improvement, but there is hope.
Inigo Montoya wrote:5. The improved passing by guys like Diaw, Exum and Hill will help Gobert and Favors get some easy points, finally.

Hope so. Rudy already benefiting from better passing.
Inigo Montoya wrote:6. The lingering issue of getting scored on with very little time on the clock persists from last season. Even in the first half, the Suns managed to score on us with 3 seconds to go, after inbounding from under their own basket after Jazz free throws. Super frustrating to see we still have this issue.

:(
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,580
And1: 3,030
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#226 » by Daddy 801 » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:13 pm

Marcus Paige was cut. Pretty much any talk of trading Mack or Neto I think can be put to rest.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#227 » by stitches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:25 pm

Daddy 801 wrote:Marcus Paige was cut. Pretty much any talk of trading Mack or Neto I think can be put to rest.

I don't think this cut has any major implications on whether or not Mack or Neto is traded. Paige was going to get cut either way. The whole reason we gave him this contract is so we can stash him in the D-League(I don't know what the exact procedure is, so if I'm wrong, someone who knows it, please correct me). I don't think anybody had any illusions that he will make the team at this point.

About the pending cuts ... I don't know how you guys feel about this, but I feel for Chris Johnson. This guy has done everything right and has played his ass off for the team and I will be sad to see him go, but I hope he finds a place somewhere in the league.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#228 » by KqWIN » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:32 pm

It was a nice thing for the Jazz to give those guys some PT before they got cut.
JazzMan_OS
Sophomore
Posts: 219
And1: 135
Joined: Jul 27, 2016

Re: RE: Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#229 » by JazzMan_OS » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:33 pm

stitches wrote:
Daddy 801 wrote:Marcus Paige was cut. Pretty much any talk of trading Mack or Neto I think can be put to rest.

I don't think this cut has any major implications on whether or not Mack or Neto is traded. Paige was going to get cut either way. The whole reason we gave him this contract is so we can stash him in the D-League(I don't know what the exact procedure is, so if I'm wrong, someone who knows it, please correct me). I don't think anybody had any illusions that he will make the team at this point.

About the pending cuts ... I don't know how you guys feel about this, but I feel for Chris Johnson. This guy has done everything right and has played his ass off for the team and I will be sad to see him go, but I hope he finds a place somewhere in the league.

I'd love to see Johnson go to Brooklyn or Philly where he'll have an opportunity to play a lot of minutes.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#230 » by stitches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:35 pm

Seems like Quincy Ford and Eric Dawson were cut, too...
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#231 » by stitches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:36 pm

KqWIN wrote:It was a nice thing for the Jazz to give those guys some PT before they got cut.

They probably didn't do themselves any favors with their PT.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#232 » by stitches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:44 pm

Don't know if this is the right place, but oh well...

Read on Twitter


Multiple sources: NBA expansion to Seattle is on the table https://t.co/qRlrolQGbj
— Kevin Nesgoda (@KDN4) October 13, 2016


I think it's a great idea. Seattle deserves its own team. If this happens... who do you protect on the Jazz?

Hill, Exum, Hood, Hayward, Favors, Lyles, Gobert... who's the last player you protect? Burks? Or Joe Johnson? I think I'd protect Burks.
User avatar
bleu
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,440
And1: 1,146
Joined: Apr 24, 2007
       

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#233 » by bleu » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:49 pm

Wouldn't be too surprised to see the NBA expand to 32, but probably not much beyond that. Wonder where else they would go?
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#234 » by KqWIN » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:57 pm

stitches wrote:
KqWIN wrote:It was a nice thing for the Jazz to give those guys some PT before they got cut.

They probably didn't do themselves any favors with their PT.


Not the greatest showing by the SLC Stars...
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#235 » by stitches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:59 pm

bleu wrote:Wouldn't be too surprised to see the NBA expand to 32, but probably not much beyond that. Wonder where else they would go?

Yeah, 32 seems like such a perfect number for a league like that...
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,078
And1: 8,360
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#236 » by Inigo Montoya » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:01 pm

I think the league is watered down enough as it is.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
UTJazzFan_Echo1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,769
And1: 279
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Location: Utah
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#237 » by UTJazzFan_Echo1 » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:56 pm

stitches wrote:team. If this happens... who do you protect on the Jazz?

Hill, Exum, Hood, Hayward, Favors, Lyles, Gobert... who's the last player you protect? Burks? Or Joe Johnson? I think I'd protect Burks.

Call me crazy, but I would probably protect Neto as the last one.
Jerry Sloan >>>>>>>> Everything else.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#238 » by stitches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:57 pm

UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:
stitches wrote:team. If this happens... who do you protect on the Jazz?

Hill, Exum, Hood, Hayward, Favors, Lyles, Gobert... who's the last player you protect? Burks? Or Joe Johnson? I think I'd protect Burks.

Call me crazy, but I would probably protect Neto as the last one.


You are crazy :D
UTJazzFan_Echo1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,769
And1: 279
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Location: Utah
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#239 » by UTJazzFan_Echo1 » Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:00 pm

stitches wrote:
UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:
stitches wrote:team. If this happens... who do you protect on the Jazz?

Hill, Exum, Hood, Hayward, Favors, Lyles, Gobert... who's the last player you protect? Burks? Or Joe Johnson? I think I'd protect Burks.

Call me crazy, but I would probably protect Neto as the last one.


You are crazy :D

Probably. I just think that with his age, skill and cheap contract he'd be worth keeping a hold of.

Burks still needs to prove he can stay healthy before I would be willing to let Neto go in his place. I love Burks, just need to see the health first. Plus, you're going to lose some of those guys in the near future anyways with how much money each of them will be demanding (if they're all healthy). Neto's cheap contract helps you maintain more talent for longer.

But ya, I'm probably crazy.
Jerry Sloan >>>>>>>> Everything else.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: The Preseason Thread 

Post#240 » by KqWIN » Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:09 pm

KqWIN wrote:



Something I've noticed about Exum's game is that he is now ambidextrous around the hoop. If you watch Exum's u19 footage, he's very right hand dominant around the rim. He never finished with his left. Now he's finishing with both hands on either side of the rim and even off the wrong foot if the situation calls for it. Nice skill development there.

Return to Utah Jazz