Trade Ideas for This Season

Charlie_S · Post #281 » by **Charlie_S** » Wed Feb 9, 2022 7:22 pm

Charlie_S wrote:Take it with the proverbial grain of salt, but the main Italian sports newspaper is reporting that the Jazz have made an offer to the Hawks for Gallinari that would include Ingles and Gay.

Haha nevermind, guess they were just talking out of their ass as usual

stitches · Post #282 » by **stitches** » Wed Feb 9, 2022 7:31 pm

Read on Twitter

I love Joe. I hope we get him back in the summer on a vet min deal. Weirdly enough I like this deal more in the long-run than in the short term, although... it's better to have players that might play than injured ones guaranteed to not play. The compensation(2 seconds) is reasonable I guess. I think we get out of luxury tax too?

red4hf · Post #283 » by **red4hf** » Wed Feb 9, 2022 7:44 pm

Very classy statements by Ingles....... I don't think this gets us out of the tax.......

D Rog · Post #284 » by **D Rog** » Wed Feb 9, 2022 7:56 pm

This deal doesn't get the Jazz out of luxury tax - you send out $14.5M (Ingles and Hughes)
You bring in NAW at $3.2M + Juancho Hernangomez at $6.9M (Damn!!! Who is that guys agent?)

I can see this deal as a precursor to another deal

SoCalJazzFan · Post #285 » by **SoCalJazzFan** » Wed Feb 9, 2022 8:53 pm

With this deal, I think we are officially out of running for Jerami Grant. Not sure who else would be that wing we need that would still be available.

tugs · Post #286 » by **tugs** » Wed Feb 9, 2022 9:56 pm

NAW and Clarkson be playing HORSE off the bench

zero24gravity · Post #287 » by **zero24gravity** » Wed Feb 9, 2022 10:18 pm

SoCalJazzFan wrote:With this deal, I think we are officially out of running for Jerami Grant. Not sure who else would be that wing we need that would still be available.

I've wanted him on the team since before he blew-up, but I don't think Grant wanted to play with the Jazz, based on what has been reported he desires.

I think the Ingles trade actually opens up more options, not closes them.

For example: Barnes is still a possibility. Clarkson + Hernangomez + 1st?

tugs · Post #288 » by **tugs** » Wed Feb 9, 2022 10:24 pm

Yeah I have a feeling Jazz isn't done yet. With Butler and Forrest performing well, JC somehow became expendable

bkohler · Post #289 » by **bkohler** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:51 am

I bet they trade Clarkson and salary dump Juancho.

AingesBurner · Post #290 » by **AingesBurner** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:55 am

tugs wrote:Yeah I have a feeling Jazz isn't done yet. With Butler and Forrest performing well, JC somehow became expendable

This could be right, I think we may flip NAW because he’s still a young prospect.

CAE15 · Post #291 » by **CAE15** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:58 am

bkohler wrote:I bet they trade Clarkson and salary dump Juancho.

I think they were able to get NAW for a couple of likely really late picks (in the 50s) is because they were willing to take on Juancho's money. Which it's not the worst thing to have an actual power forward on the roster and I'm starting to think he may stick.

Post #292 » by **Inigo Montoya** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 3:15 pm

GobertReport wrote:
tugs wrote:Yeah I have a feeling Jazz isn't done yet. With Butler and Forrest performing well, JC somehow became expendable

This could be right, I think we may flip NAW because he’s still a young prospect.

We're old and asset-depleted. We need young prospects. I think we keep NAW.

Catchall · Post #293 » by **Catchall** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 4:35 pm

I think the Jazz have too many rotation players right now. I'd expect the Jazz to make another move.

SoCalJazzFan · Post #294 » by **SoCalJazzFan** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:53 pm

Rumor that Spurs in talks to send Poeltl to Hornets for PJ Washington and Kai Jones and potentially a 1st!

I wonder if we could offer Hassan, filler (Hernanagomez or Gay) and forego the first for those two?

(Edit)

Read on Twitter

SoCalJazzFan · Post #295 » by **SoCalJazzFan** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:45 pm

Hornets were smart and traded for Harrell instead.

SoCalJazzFan · Post #296 » by **SoCalJazzFan** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:46 pm

Can a man hope?

Read on Twitter

AingesBurner · Post #297 » by **AingesBurner** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:23 pm

So much for adding a big wing… This felt like an asset collection move for the summer, hopefully.

zero24gravity · Post #298 » by **zero24gravity** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:54 pm

I'm sure the team looked at options to add another viable wing defender, but just couldn't get the right deal done.

Perhaps the team getting a wake up call over that terrible 15 game stretch, learning to play better when Gobert is out of the game, fresh legs of their 2 stars (DM looks great the last couple games!), adding NAW, and the emergence of Paschall + Forrest, will be the kind of change the team needs. Tying to have faith here. It's possible! The roster is talented enough.

Catchall · Post #299 » by **Catchall** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:49 pm

tugs wrote:NAW and Clarkson be playing HORSE off the bench

They're both inefficient on offense, but I think NAW is at least a neutral defensive player, which is an improvement over Clarkson.

Catchall · Post #300 » by **Catchall** » Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:51 pm

zero24gravity wrote:I'm sure the team looked at options to add another viable wing defender, but just couldn't get the right deal done.

Perhaps the team getting a wake up call over that terrible 15 game stretch, learning to play better when Gobert is out of the game, fresh legs of their 2 stars (DM looks great the last couple games!), adding NAW, and the emergence of Paschall + Forrest, will be the kind of change the team needs. Tying to have faith here. It's possible! The roster is talented enough.

To really upgrade the defense, the Jazz would have needed to get a defender like Lu Dort, Mathisse Thybulle or Marcus Smart. Yes, Jerami Grant would have been very cool, but it sounds like the asking price was just too high.

Short of that, Trent Forrest, Eric Paschall and Danuel House are decent.