Inigo Montoya wrote:I get the rationale with Zion and I wouldn't be upset if the Jazz went for it but he doesn't strike me as a guy who would stay in Utah, just like Ingram said he won't re-sign with the Jazz and thus ended any trade discussion. We know Zion wanted to go to New York and was upset with his agents for not making it happen. Personally, I think that given all his issues, Zion would be much better served playing for a small market team like the Jazz. He already gets a lot of flak for his injuries and conditioning, and it would be x100 worse if he played in a big market like New York, as would the distractions off the court.
I agree Zion in a small market would be good for his career. The main reason I would be down to gamble on Zion even if he did want to walk is there is a gigantic upside and very little downside due to his contract and the Jazz’s situation. If we were competing now and his contract was fully guaranteed I am not sure it would be worth the risk.
Best case scenario is we trade for him, draft Flagg and one other good guy next year, and then start to go for it the season after. Zion buys in and is happy with the Jazz and we have a damn good squad.
Mid case scenario. Same as above but Zion shows he doesn’t want to stay longterm. Ok…trade him before the contract is up. He’s rehabbed his image and is now worth more than we traded for him.
Lowest scenario. Zion is dead weight. Never figured it out. Is a fat mess and locker room distraction. Well…you can just cut his contract or trade him for a small return.
I just think it’s worth the risk because best case scenario we draft two really good guys this and next season, and we have a Collier, Next years pick, Cooper, Lauri, and Kessler. And a bench of who knows what by that time. But if three of our starters are on rookie deals we could resign Sexton or Collins, or other good veteran players. It would be pretty easy to surround the starters with good players at that point.